Home› The Porch
Options

Tryin to understand why NO PJ on webcast

binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
edited June 2008 in The Porch
Either contractual or they don't want the fans to see them. I just can't figure out why on earth PEARL JAM is not on the roo webcast this weekend.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Options
    mattcozeamattcozea Posts: 377
    I'll give you a hint, it starts with an L and rhymes with Rollapalooza.
    6-27-98 Alpine Valley
    10-8-00 Alpine Valley
    10-9-00 All State Arena, Chicago
    4-23-03 Assembly Hall, Champaign
    5-16-06 United Center, Chicago
    6-30-06 Marcus Amphitheater, Milwaukee
    8-05-07 Grant Park, Chicago
    8-21-08 EV, Auditorium Theater, Chicago
    8-22-08 EV, Auditorium Theater, Chicago
  • Options
    binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    mattcoz wrote:
    I'll give you a hint, it starts with an L and rhymes with Rollapalooza.

    I call bullshit on that cop out. It even says on the roo webcast that "Viewer Discretion is Advised"
    They aren't censorin shit!
    That excuse is tired. I'm thinking the new VERIZON contract is prohibiting them from broadcasting on the ATT blueroom.
  • Options
    slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,757
    binauralsounds wrote:
    I call bullshit on that cop out. It even says on the roo webcast that "Viewer Discretion is Advised"
    They aren't censorin shit!
    That excuse is tired. I'm thinking the new VERIZON contract is prohibiting them from broadcasting on the ATT blueroom.

    No ... what they are saying is the last time AT&T broadcast them, they were censored. So it would be pretty strange for them to allow AT&T to do it again.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • Options
    slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,757
    binauralsounds wrote:
    Either contractual or they don't want the fans to see them. I just can't figure out why on earth PEARL JAM is not on the roo webcast this weekend.

    this is probably a hint:

    http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070809-pearl-jam-censored-by-att-calls-for-a-neutral-net.html
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • Options
    binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    slightofjeff wrote:
    No ... what they are saying is the last time AT&T broadcast them, they were censored. So it would be pretty strange for them to allow AT&T to do it again.

    If you think that.. no problem. few other pj friends of mine also seem to think Verizon is holdin them by the balls.
    Makes dam good sense to me!
  • Options
    slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,757
    binauralsounds wrote:
    If you think that.. no problem. few other pj friends of mine also seem to think Verizon is holdin them by the balls.
    Makes dam good sense to me!

    I think your "friends" are overthinking things.

    You don't think it has something to do with AT&T censoring PJ less than a year ago, and the hub-bub around that? Really? It was kind of a big deal at the time.

    So much so that I would have been absolutely, positively shocked if they'd allowed it again this year.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • Options
    opsopcopolisopsopcopolis Posts: 1,096
    Probably because they're gonna be on Fuse
    2006: Hartford
    2008: Camden 2, Hartford
    2010: Hartford
    2013: Wrigley, Worcester x2, Hartford
    2015: NYC
    2016: Philly 2, MSG x2, Boston 2, (TOTD Philly 2, MSG)
    2018: Prague, Krakow, Berlin, Boston x2
    2022: San Diego, Sacramento, Las Vegas
  • Options
    binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    slightofjeff wrote:
    I think your "friends" are overthinking things.

    You don't think it has something to do with AT&T censoring PJ less than a year ago, and the hub-bub around that? Really? It was kind of a big deal at the time.

    So much so that I would have been absolutely, positively shocked if they'd allowed it again this year.

    Makes sense. Att apologized and said they wouldn't do it again, this webcast is NOT censored and PJ shuns away.
    Owell... I'll see them one day live again sometime.
  • Options
    mattcozeamattcozea Posts: 377
    opsopcopolis wrote:
    Probably because they're gonna be on Fuse
    They're not mutually exclusive, Metallica for instance is on both.
    6-27-98 Alpine Valley
    10-8-00 Alpine Valley
    10-9-00 All State Arena, Chicago
    4-23-03 Assembly Hall, Champaign
    5-16-06 United Center, Chicago
    6-30-06 Marcus Amphitheater, Milwaukee
    8-05-07 Grant Park, Chicago
    8-21-08 EV, Auditorium Theater, Chicago
    8-22-08 EV, Auditorium Theater, Chicago
  • Options
    binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    mattcoz wrote:
    They're not mutually exclusive, Metallica for instance is on both.

    For what it's worth... I can't take much more metallica on the webcast. started okay, but man.... not as good as I thought live. eh...
  • Options
    Sharon_Hearts_PJSharon_Hearts_PJ Bristol, PA Posts: 1,383
    My guess is it has nothing to do with AT&T vs. Verizon, b/c 'Roo is not part of their regular tour.
    I'm betting they refused to allow AT&T to broadcast them based on the crap that was pulled last year, and I stand behind them 100% for it. Why let PJ's name be used to advertise the brand of AT&T after that bullshit?
    *Rock and/or Roll!*
  • Options
    mattcozeamattcozea Posts: 377
    binauralsounds wrote:
    For what it's worth... I can't take much more metallica on the webcast. started okay, but man.... not as good as I thought live. eh...
    Heh, well it's completely different when you're actually there. Would you be happy if someone judged Pearl Jam's live performances based on a webcast?
    6-27-98 Alpine Valley
    10-8-00 Alpine Valley
    10-9-00 All State Arena, Chicago
    4-23-03 Assembly Hall, Champaign
    5-16-06 United Center, Chicago
    6-30-06 Marcus Amphitheater, Milwaukee
    8-05-07 Grant Park, Chicago
    8-21-08 EV, Auditorium Theater, Chicago
    8-22-08 EV, Auditorium Theater, Chicago
  • Options
    ZAPPERZAPPER Posts: 246
    binauralsounds wrote:
    For what it's worth... I can't take much more metallica on the webcast. started okay, but man.... not as good as I thought live. eh...

    hey but you gotta admit phil collins is a pretty talented drummer
    Previously known as Elzar
  • Options
    binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    mattcoz wrote:
    Heh, well it's completely different when you're actually there. Would you be happy if someone judged Pearl Jam's live performances based on a webcast?

    I wouldn't care 2 shits if someone judged PJ on a webcast or any other type of show. If they don't like them, owell......... Why would I be upset on someones choice of music? Could care less.
Sign In or Register to comment.