correct splleing.

Godfather. · February 2010

correct spelling is over rated

I cdnuolt blveiee
taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy,
it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are,
the olny iprmoatnt tihng is
taht the first and last ltteer be in the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a taotl mses and you can still raed it wouthit a porbelm.
This is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by
istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Amzanig huh? :roll:

Godfather.

Claireack · February 2010

I think I've read something similar before.

Isn't the mind a clever thing!

Godfather. · February 2010

Claireack wrote:

I think I've read something similar before.

Isn't the mind a clever thing!

yeah it's a cut and paste from a e-mail I got
but yes our Brain is capeable of more then we will ever know I believe.

Godfather.

theserialthrilla · February 2010

i didnt understand a word of what you just said :twisted:

markin ball · February 2010

Godfather. wrote:

Claireack wrote:

I think I've read something similar before.

Isn't the mind a clever thing!

yeah it's a cut and paste from a e-mail I got
but yes our Brain is capeable of more then we will ever know I believe.

Godfather.

capable

Brisk. · February 2010

We recognise shapes no the individual letters, if things are in capital letters we read slower and more inccorectly as the shape is taken away from the letter. Also reading from a screen on average is 13% slower.

Heatherj43 · February 2010

I do find that remarkable. Sometimes I have trouble reading things that are written correctly, yet what you wrote was a breeze.

Cosmo · February 2010

Then there shouldn't be a problem for any of us reading and comprehending this:
"In fcat, deispte what the blgeogrs theeeslmvs bivelee, the frtuue of lrtieary ctruule does not lie with bolgs -- or at lseat, it suhldon't. The bolg from, that mneicslaly of oeabtnrvosis, onniipos, and likns, is not well-suteid to witirng auobt lartiurete, and it is no cdiniconcee taht trhee is no lareitry bggoelr wtih the aceuidne and inuefncle of the top polaiictl brgegols. For one thnig, leturarite is not nwes the way pcoiilts is news -- it doesn't ofefr mtpilule evetns erevy day for the bgegolr to cmonemt on. For athenor, beziitsed cnaromtemy, whcih is all the bolg form awolls, is next to uelsess when it cemos to tkliang aubot bkoos. Ltrrieay ccsiritim is olny worth hanvig if it at laset svitres to be liatrrey in its own rihgt, wtih a spoce, citopelxmy, and aroithtuy taht no bggleor I know even wtnas to acivhee. The only ufusel prat of msot book bgols, in fcat, are the links to lnog-from esyass and aictrels by psaeroifosnl werrtis, ulsualy from pnirt janrluos. "

justam · February 2010

I think this probably only works because we learned the correct spellings to begin with and our memories are helping us unscramble the letters and make them into something we can recognize.

Wobbie · February 2010

testing, testing:

fcuk yseoulrf

did taht wrok?

correct splleing.

Comments