Tiger Woods-the most dominant athlete ever?

Options
2

Comments

  • jamie uk
    jamie uk Posts: 3,812
    Sorry guys, I'm not having it. Golf is a past time, a recreational activity played by old guys, and young guys on their days off :p

    Sure the top guys are good at it, it's all they do ;)

    here's my vote for most dominant athlete, world class ability, attitude, and just look at the honours :D


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Giggs


    http://youtube.com/watch?v=hrOyedpeZnk
    I came, I saw, I concurred.....
  • swede
    swede Posts: 558
    i dont think he can be a stand alone person

    with him are some that people have mentioned in lance armstrong, and roger federer

    what about donald bradman? he did alright...
    think about the achievements rod laver did, they were out of this world when put in todays context.

    also annika sorenstam has done quite a bit for womens golf too, granted not at this very second but prior to her last injury, holy smokes.

    but yeh, there are a lot of incredible sports people out there, i dont think tiger is one to be stand alone..
  • gregkitefan
    gregkitefan Posts: 1,122
    I hope Trevor holds on today.
    38
  • Stone Is God
    Stone Is God Posts: 1,331
    Golf is a skill, not a sport.

    Golfers are the most mentally fragile people I've ever seen. The reason why Tiger has a leg up on most of them his because of his brain. While others piss their pants on Sunday's he lives for it. He embraces it.

    If you want to a grown man piss himself watch today to see who TIger is playing with. There'll be a wet spot in his crotch and a stream coming down his leg.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me.
  • PJ_Saluki
    PJ_Saluki Posts: 1,006
    You know, I think Tiger gets so much run because like Jordan he's an international marketing icon. Federer can't be considered more dominant because he's never won a major on clay. It's tough to give someone "most dominant" or "best-ever" recognition. There are many other athletes who have dominated their respective sports and eras. These folks are just a few. It's Wikipedia (except for Ruth) but I'm lazy:

    Cael Sanderson was 159-0 with four NCAA national championships at Iowa State. He wasn't as good internationally but he dominated DI wrestling.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cael_Sanderson

    Edwin Moses was the best 400-meter hurdler in the world for more than a decade. He won two Olympic golds -- 1976 and 1984 -- and would have won a third if not for the 1980 boycott. Moses won 107 consecutive finals and 122 in a row overall.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Moses

    Wrestler Dan Gable went 118-1 at Iowa with three NCAA championships. His only loss came in the national championship match of his senior season. Counting high school, Gable won 182 matches in a row. Gable won gold at the 1972 Olympics without surrendering a single point.
    http://www.dangable.com/aboutdg.html

    Discus thrower Al Oerter set the standard in his event for more than 20 years. Oerter was a four-time Olympic gold medalist (1956, 1960, 1964, 1968) who set that meet's record three times. Oerter, at age 43, threw what would still be a world record in the discus during a commercial shoot.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Oerter

    Martina Navratilova won an amazing 18 Grand Slam singles titles and 31 Grand Slam doubles titles. Navratilova's 167 singles titles and 177 doubles titles are both open era records. She also owns a 74-match winning streak, the longest in women's tennis history.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martina_Navratilova

    Babe Didrikson legitimized women's athletics in the 1930s. She was an All-American basketball player. She set five world records at the 1932 AAU Championships on her way to six gold medals. Didrikson won gold in the javelin and 80-meter hurdles at the 1932 Olympics. She tied for first in the high jump but judges awarded the medal to a teammate because they disapproved of Didrikson's head-first jumping style. Didrikson began playing golf in 1935 and was the first woman to ever play in a PGA event in 1938. She dominated women's golf in the 1940s. The Associated Press named her the Woman Athlete of the 20th century. SI also honored her as such.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babe_Didrikson

    Wilt Chamberlain destroyed his competition at every level of basketball. Wilt scored 100 points in an NBA game. He won seven NBA scoring titles, 11 rebounding titles, nine field goal percentage titles and one assists title. Wilt was just as dominant in college, setting single game scoring (52) and rebounding (31) marks in his first varsity start.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilt_Chamberlain

    Babe Ruth was the original duel threat. Ruth batted .342 with 714 home runs and 2,211 RBI in his 21 Major League seasons. Ruth hit 60 home runs in 1927, a record which stood for 44 years. His 714 home runs were a career record until the woefully underrated Henry Aaron broke the mark 39 years later. You want dominant? Ruth's 60 homers in 1927 were 14% of total homers in the AL. A modern day player would need to hit more than 300 home runs to equal that feat. As a starting pitcher, Ruth finished with a 94-46 record (67%) with a 2.28 ERA. His 1.75 ERA in 1916 led the league. He owns the MLB record for longest World Series complete game (14 innings) and he pitched 13 consecutive scoreless innings in that game, a 2-1 win. Ruth's World Series record of 29 2/3 scoreless innings stood for 43 years.
    http://www.baberuth.com/index.php
    "Almost all those politicians took money from Enron, and there they are holding hearings. That's like O.J. Simpson getting in the Rae Carruth jury pool." -- Charles Barkley
  • yosi1
    yosi1 Posts: 3,272
    Roger Federer.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane.
  • know1
    know1 Posts: 6,800
    I'd put him in the top 5 or so ever. If he gets to 19 wins in majors or wins the grand slam, he'll have a very strong case for best ever.

    Of course, at the same time Federer could hang even with them in terms of grand slam numbers.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • solsurfr
    solsurfr Posts: 207
    PJ_Saluki wrote:
    .....It's the level of competition that makes golf a sport. Drilling a golf ball 350 yards with accuracy is tough. Consistently putting a golf ball within five feet of the pin from 200 yards out is tough. Of course golf isn't on the same level of exertion as playing at the NBA, NFL, NHL, MLS, or MLB level but it's still a sport. ....Tiger is an athlete and he seems to be the most dominant at his sport in history.

    If you're talking pure competition as your definition of sport, then bowling and texas hold'em are sports too... fine. Tiger is an athlete? Yes, in the context of golfer's as athletes... sure, why not.

    In terms of pure athletic ability, golf is hardly in that vein. Golf is a repetitive skill that is to be honed and mastered that does require hand-eye coordination, strength, and mental fortitude. I play golf recreationally and really believe those things... I also played college football for a I-AA school as well as basketball and tennis and can tell you straight up that the intangibles that are god-given such as physical movements while in the air (basketball), the ability to change direction on a dime, raw speed PLUS hand-eye coordination and strength are the definitions of athletic ability.

    You hear the sports broadcasters of the major sports use phrases like, "athletic move" or "he/she used their athletic ability..." etc... those are the skills that are hardly taught but are more instinctual in nature...

    Take Randy Moss or Michael Jordan or whoever is an elite athlete in their sport... they (like their competitor) can run a pattern, dribble fast... what separates them is their ability to do things physically way better or in a fashion that their counterpart can't do or is not as good at in doing... such as jumping in the air and changing directions, or turning a split second faster than their opponent... the physicality of the sport and the athletic ability in many ways can take over the mental part of the game which, imo, draws the line between golfers, bowlers, whatever sport that requires MORE repetition, technique, and mental toughness.

    Don't mean to stir the pot but it's not fair to Tiger to compare him to other athletes in other sports where those athletes truly use much more of their god-given athletic ability. Tiger is the most dominant golfer in history or will be after he breaks Jack's record. He's NOT nor will he ever will be the most dominate "athlete" in history... his sport is not defined by the same variables that require Michael Jordan to be able to change directions in the air or Michael Vick to escape a sack then elude 8 defenders to the end zone... the two are not even close. Tiger could be the most mentally tough athlete in the world... but surely not the best athlete in the world....

    If you look at Tiger as an individual, it's obvious he has a very prototypical athletic build and if we agree he may have those physical intangibles then it's probably a lot of the reason he's as dominate as he is in a sport that really doesn't require the same athletic intangibles.

    Just my opinion peeps... rant not meant to offend any pro golfers in the thread. I enjoy playing golf very much.
  • Tone
    Tone Posts: 1,206
    swede wrote:
    i dont think he can be a stand alone person

    with him are some that people have mentioned in lance armstrong, and roger federer

    what about donald bradman? he did alright...
    think about the achievements rod laver did, they were out of this world when put in todays context.

    Don Bradman! *gets down on knees and bows towards Bowral* See, I had a post (that I lost) where I mentioned cricket (basically cause I didn't know who A Rod was until "baseball" was mentioned). People say cricket is baseball on valium, I think it's the other way around ;) (sorry baseball fans) Shane Warne, despite being a complete tosser, was/is a phenomenal cricketer as was Glenn McGrath (if we're talking recent players). Gilly is an out and out legend and I'm guttered he's retired :( Brian Lara, Sachin Tendulkar, Vyv Richards, Dennis Lillee... the list is endless.

    Rod Laver is a legend too. Lou Hoad, Ken Rosewell, Andre Agassi.

    PJ Saluki mentioned Martina Navratilova - talk about an incredible record!

    Maybe we need to break this down into sport categories ;)
    Glaciers melting in the dead of night and the superstars sucked into the supermassive.
  • lukin2006
    lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    Unless I missed it, some that have not been mentioned

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayne_gretzky

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pele
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • Bathgate66
    Bathgate66 Posts: 15,813
    c'mon

    you cant really call golfers- even the best in the world- " atheletes" ,-
    not in the true sense of the word.

    :rolleyes:
    For the ones who had a notion, a notion deep inside
    That it ain't no sin to be glad you're alive
    platessmall.jpg
    ORGAN DONATION SAVES LIVES
    http://www.UNOS.org
    Donate Organs and Save a Life
  • Ledbetterman10
    Ledbetterman10 Posts: 16,991
    lukin2006 wrote:
    are golfers athletes? look at john daly?


    Are field goal kickers athletes? are designated hitters athletes?
    2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1

    Pearl Jam bootlegs:
    http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
  • solsurfr
    solsurfr Posts: 207
    Tone wrote:

    Rod Laver is a legend too. Lou Hoad, Ken Rosewell, Andre Agassi.

    PJ Saluki mentioned Martina Navratilova - talk about an incredible record!

    Rod Laver/Agassi... only men in recent history to win a major on all surfaces... Martina Navratilova... most dominate female tennis player.

    Tennis is a great example of a sport with all the elements of athleticism... hand/eye coordination, technique, mental toughness, and physical agility. And like golf, there is no team to carry or hide behind. It's you and only you in the fight...
  • LikeAnOcean
    LikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    Golf is a skill, not a sport.
    Every sport is a skill. Just because you can run fast or bench a lot does not mean you can play a sport.. Sports are more mental than not. Sure you have to be in shape and to various degrees. Just about anyone can condition themselves to have the strength to perform a sport, but only a select few have the mental skills to make it to the top.
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    Just about anyone can condition themselves to have the strength to perform a sport, but only a select few have the mental skills to make it to the top.

    I disagree with this. I don't think it's just the mental skills that separate the great athletes from the rest.

    Golf is hard but it doesn't require an excellent physique and you don't have to be in perfect condition. An athlete, however, does need speed, strength, agility... And also the mental skills.
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • LikeAnOcean
    LikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    Collin wrote:
    I disagree with this. I don't think it's just the mental skills that separate the great athletes from the rest.

    Golf is hard but it doesn't require an excellent physique and you don't have to be in perfect condition. An athlete, however, does need speed, strength, agility... And also the mental skills.
    So where do you draw the line?

    Say golf is 90% mental, 10% physical.

    Baseball maybe 60% mental, 40% physical

    Basketball 25% mental, 75% physical..

    I'm going to argue an activity that requires you to use your motor skills in competition is indeed a sport.

    Michael Jordan wasn't the tallest, strongest, fastest, but he had the skills.
  • Ledbetterman10
    Ledbetterman10 Posts: 16,991
    I don't get how everyone is saying that Golf isn't physical. you swing and hit the ball. that's physical. it's not like playing chess...that's mental. you have to physically swing properly every single time or the ball goes wayward. is it as physically exhaustingly as playing linebacker? of course not....not even close. but it's not "mental" to have a perfect swing ever time, it's physical.

    of course I understand what everyone is saying: there's no running or contact between competitors in golf like there is in most sports. Golfers just walk, stop, swing and hit the ball, then walk again. but isn't that exactly what David Ortiz does?
    2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1

    Pearl Jam bootlegs:
    http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
  • solsurfr
    solsurfr Posts: 207
    So where do you draw the line?

    Say golf is 90% mental, 10% physical.

    Baseball maybe 60% mental, 40% physical

    Basketball 25% mental, 75% physical..

    I'm going to argue an activity that requires you to use your motor skills in competition is indeed a sport.

    Michael Jordan wasn't the tallest, strongest, fastest, but he had the skills.

    There is no line to draw. Each sport has it's toughest mental challenges:

    4 and 5, 4th quarter, 30 secs to go..
    Free throws in OT with a raukus crowd
    Full Count, bottom of the ninth, bases loaded
    5ft Putt on the 18th, sudden death
    Shootout (soccer/hockey)

    Each sport has it's relevant mental challenges. It is those who embrace and dominate those times that separate them from the pack... Federer, Woods, Elway, Favre, Jordan, Bird... these guys have ICE in their veins under the pressure cooker... what makes the player the best athlete... are these traits PLUS the PHYSICAL ability to overcome their opponent, challenge and maintain pure physical control either in the air, on the turn, on the pass, on the catch, on the throw... whatever.

    I've always say... take the top 5 sports, take the best of those 5, and see who comes out on top... Will Tiger dunk over LeBron? Not in our lifetime... Could Michael Vick dunk on LeBron? Hrmmm... Could either of these guys make left turns for 160 laps at Dover Downs? Haha... I guess so.... Could Lebron make a 5ft putt if had the opportunity? I would say a better than average chance of sinking it... (funny to picture, I know).

    Hard to compare, I know, but really the definition of an athlete is really about mind, body, and soul... not just the mind.
  • PJ_Saluki
    PJ_Saluki Posts: 1,006
    Look at the last couple of No. 1 golfers in the world. Tiger is a physical specimen. David Duval was in great physical shape but lost his nerve. Golfers are learning that they need to be in shape to extend their careers and maximize their potential. There's way too much competition to be a slob and expect to win consistently unless you're just a freakish athlete, a la Babe Ruth. Sure, you have guys like Angel Carbrera (last season's U.S. Open winner) who can suck down heaters on the course and compete, but NFL QB Dan Marino (Marlboro Lights) and MLB's Mark Grace (Winston) were known puffers and they still did alright. Look at Charles Barkley, a Hall of Fame NBA player. Guy could dunk on 7-foot centers but can't hit a golf ball to save his life. People who don't believe golf is a sport aren't going to change their minds. Those of us who do believe golf is a sport won't change ours.
    "Almost all those politicians took money from Enron, and there they are holding hearings. That's like O.J. Simpson getting in the Rae Carruth jury pool." -- Charles Barkley
  • solsurfr
    solsurfr Posts: 207
    PJ_Saluki wrote:
    Look at the last couple of No. 1 golfers in the world. Tiger is a physical specimen. David Duval was in great physical shape but lost his nerve. Golfers are learning that they need to be in shape to extend their careers and maximize their potential. There's way too much competition to be a slob and expect to win consistently unless you're just a freakish athlete, a la Babe Ruth. Sure, you have guys like Angel Carbrera (last season's U.S. Open winner) who can suck down heaters on the course and compete, but NFL QB Dan Marino (Marlboro Lights) and MLB's Mark Grace (Winston) were known puffers and they still did alright. Look at Charles Barkley, a Hall of Fame NBA player. Guy could dunk on 7-foot centers but can't hit a golf ball to save his life. People who don't believe golf is a sport aren't going to change their minds. Those of us who do believe golf is a sport won't change ours.

    I think most people would agree golf is a sport... the fact that it's debatable already questions the validity of the athletes who play the game though. I think golf is one of the hardest sports I've ever tried to play but here's where I'm coming from:

    - I took up golf a few years ago. Never played it in my life. The work buddies who introduced me to it have played it for probably 20 or so years maybe more... they were terribly out of shape, a couple of them smoked, and they always shot around 101, 99, 103, that area... My first year... I never broke 115.. One summer, I spent some time at a driving range, took a lesson.. and came out with those same guys and nearly beat them every time I went out and broke 100 a few times. It took me less than one summer to catch up to these guys and hang with them... as we all sucked pretty bad.

    - I played cornerback for a pretty good I-AA school... was a walk on. Worked out real hard, studied tape, pretty strong, relatively fast. In competing for a roster spot, the guys ahead of me barely practiced or didn't care, barely stronger than me...BUT ridiculously fast and no matter who they covered, covered them like a blanket...whereas for me.. it was a struggle depending on who I had to matchup with... the guys ahead of me on the depth chart had what I couldn't get through practice, techqnique, bench press, whatever.... they had the PHYSICAL ability to rise above any of those challenges in front of them and laughed about it on the way back to the locker room. I would shake my head in frustration after all those hours in the gym, tape review, whatever... their athletic ability truely shined when it counted and where ordinary athletes would probably struggle. More of those guys probably would've made it to the NFL if they put in the work-effort I did when I was battling for a 3rd spot on the depth chart.... oh and BTW.. Joe Flacco was the 2nd highest rated QB in the NFL combine this year... and he graduated from the same college I did... :-) lol shameless plug, sorry.