Olberman and Moore's idea of a good laugh?

2»

Comments

  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    jeffbr wrote:
    Grow up, kid.

    I apologize. A few too many bevy's and was feeling a little feisty.

    Still don't agree with you though.
  • mca47
    mca47 Posts: 13,342
    beachdweller wrote:
    I think they are making fun of the right wing religious fanatics that state natural disasters like Katrina are Gods way of cleaning and making pay the sinners of New Orleans...funny how quiet those same people are when Tornado's rip through the bible belt, or Florida is ravaged by a hurricane. No reference to God wrathe then.

    Agreed!
  • CorporateWhore
    CorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Olberman was irrelevant the day he began offering us his political, and not athletic, opinions.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,246
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Olberman was irrelevant the day he began offering us his political, and not athletic, opinions.

    I think he was pretty good at both.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • digster
    digster Posts: 1,293
    binauralsounds wrote:
    Hell, had it been some republicans saying that, this board would implode and demand a formal national apology.
    We all see the hypocrisy on this board.

    What are you talking about?

    They're assholes. Period. If Republicans said something like that, they'd be assholes. Period. I don't really see the board 'imploding' either way.
  • LONGRD
    LONGRD Posts: 6,036
    g under p wrote:
    I think he was pretty good at both.

    Peace
    He is still pretty good at both in my opinion. ;)
    PJ- 04/29/2003.06/24,25,27,28,30/2008.10/27,28,30,31/2009
    EV- 08/09,10/2008.06/08,09/2009
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,296
    darthvedder81 wrote:
    Turns out Olberman and Michael Moore are pompous asses! I'm shocked!

    You said it there. Olbermann is no longer watchable. He is so far in the tank for Obama, his show has just become a smear the Republicans hour. I used to watch his show even though I disagreed with a lot of what he said, but now it is frustrating to watch and hear Fixed New or Fox Noise over and over and over. We get it!
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,296
    g under p wrote:
    I think he was pretty good at both.

    Peace

    Until he started working for the DailyKos and MoveOn.org instead of MSNBC.
  • digster
    digster Posts: 1,293
    bootlegger10 wrote:
    Until he started working for the DailyKos and MoveOn.org instead of MSNBC.

    I think calling him the liberal version of Bill O'Reilly is pretty much spot on.
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,959
    digster wrote:
    I think calling him the liberal version of Bill O'Reilly is pretty much spot on.


    Yep...sad. He was a good anchor on sportscenter too, how the mighty have fallen. His head is so far up Howard Dean et al's asses that he's now only showing his legs.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • CorporateWhore
    CorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    O'Reilly's a bit more independent than Olberman. O'Reilly at least attempts to appear as though he's not sucking Bush's dick. Olberman is openly giving Obama fellatio on TV every night.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • digster
    digster Posts: 1,293
    cincybearcat wrote:
    Yep...sad. He was a good anchor on sportscenter too, how the mighty have fallen. His head is so far up Howard Dean et al's asses that he's now only showing his legs.

    He's trying very, very, very, very, very hard to be Ed Murrow. It's not working.

    Corporate, please don't equate Bill O'Reilly with the word 'independent' ever again. It does not equate.
  • CorporateWhore
    CorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    digster wrote:
    He's trying very, very, very, very, very hard to be Ed Murrow. It's not working.

    Corporate, please don't equate Bill O'Reilly with the word 'independent' ever again. It does not equate.

    He believes in global warming etc. Not saying he's independent, but he attempts to appear that way.

    Olberman couldn't say a negative thing about Obama if you offered him a million anal beads.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • digster
    digster Posts: 1,293
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    He believes in global warming etc.

    Look, I think the Bush administration is batshit crazy, but even THEY say global warming is a reality, man-made, etc. I really don't think this is a debate.

    Except for the Republican vice-presidential candidate, apparently.
  • jeffbr
    jeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    brandon10 wrote:
    I apologize. A few too many bevy's and was feeling a little feisty.

    Still don't agree with you though.

    No problem. I have done the same. In fact, I'm about to pour a little bourbon for myself right now.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08

Categories