For Paul, I would think it would have to be something in the finance world, but he would be so out of place it wouldn't be funny.
Nader? You got me with that one... I can't think of one position where he would make sense.
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Yes he most definitely should involve them at some level.
Equal opportunity representation and all that.
I keep getting the getting the vibe that it's all going to be very much neo-con/neo-lib influenced. All the people he's asking for advice are the ones who helped create of all this mess. Brutal.
"as in his Oct. 29 infomercial, Obama promised to "curb Russian aggression," which hardly suggests the change we need from the unilateral belligerence of the Bush foreign policy."
"It was decades later that the truth came out that the Soviets invaded only after being deliberately provoked by U.S. hawks. One of them was Robert Gates, who worked for Brzezinski in the Carter administration and who is currently the Secretary of Defense, now being considered by President-elect Obama to retain that position. A 1996 press release promoting Gates' memoir promised the revelation of "Carter's never-before-revealed covert support to Afghan mujahedeen - six months before the Soviets invaded."
"it is disquieting in the extreme that some of his (Obama's) closest advisers are inveterate hawks with a history of needlessly provoking tension with the Russians during the Cold War days. Key among them is Zbigniew Brzezinski, who, as President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser, engineered the U.S. involvement on the side of Islamic fanatics in Afghanistan."
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Ron Paul may accept a position if offered but Nader is too principled to join Obama and his phoney baloney administration. People you elected a party not a person.
Good luck and may we get everything we deserve!
Comments
what positions?
makes a big difference......
just curious.
Let's just breathe...
I am myself like you somehow
For Paul, I would think it would have to be something in the finance world, but he would be so out of place it wouldn't be funny.
Nader? You got me with that one... I can't think of one position where he would make sense.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Equal opportunity representation and all that.
I keep getting the getting the vibe that it's all going to be very much neo-con/neo-lib influenced. All the people he's asking for advice are the ones who helped create of all this mess. Brutal.
Cold War hawks nesting with Obama
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/11/EDD4142N5B.DTL
"as in his Oct. 29 infomercial, Obama promised to "curb Russian aggression," which hardly suggests the change we need from the unilateral belligerence of the Bush foreign policy."
"It was decades later that the truth came out that the Soviets invaded only after being deliberately provoked by U.S. hawks. One of them was Robert Gates, who worked for Brzezinski in the Carter administration and who is currently the Secretary of Defense, now being considered by President-elect Obama to retain that position. A 1996 press release promoting Gates' memoir promised the revelation of "Carter's never-before-revealed covert support to Afghan mujahedeen - six months before the Soviets invaded."
"it is disquieting in the extreme that some of his (Obama's) closest advisers are inveterate hawks with a history of needlessly provoking tension with the Russians during the Cold War days. Key among them is Zbigniew Brzezinski, who, as President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser, engineered the U.S. involvement on the side of Islamic fanatics in Afghanistan."
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Nader: Labour
??
rn - epa
Nader: Anywhere else.
If I opened it now would you not understand?
yep, change is a' comin' all right..
I think Jim Cramer should be Secretary of the Treasury:D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SptB3STL5rs
Good luck and may we get everything we deserve!