Ralph Nader --- Don't Waste your vote for this Hypocrite

Strangest Tribe wrote:

easy there... have a drink


please don't curse at me

You live here

Strangest Tribe wrote:

so you get a little rash on your bottom when we dig dirt on Ralphie???

but you can bash Obama because that"s criticism and we should be okay with that???

Did you not understand what I just said in my last post where I answered this already? 'Criticism of his political work and career'.....that's the difference between mudslinging and researching a candidate's stances and record.


And no rash...you guys dig all you want and you'll find 2 or 3 personal based stories and act like you've found the holy grail while I sit back and giggle at how easy as hell it is to post dirt on Obama.

my2hands wrote:

another one see's the light

tell me about it

http://forums.pearljam.com/showpost.php?p=4488696&postcount=32
http://forums.pearljam.com/showpost.php?p=4489231&postcount=48

Strangest Tribe wrote:

2 or 3???

did you even look at the website? more like 30.

and it involves his career as well.... I don't think he's actually held any political offices like senator or governor ....so we can't bash him on his lack of political experience.. or can we???? yeah we can.

Ralph Nader is really a weird creepy guy isn't he??? Did you read all this?


http://www.realchange.org/nader.htm

wow, no wonder Pearl Jam jumped off the Nader bandwagon years ago.

30 substantial stories with dirt on Nader? That site is filled with extremely biased opinion fluff. No one would use most of that crap as some kind of serious source.

The union busting claim had been debunked and the claim was brought on by two employees who had actually been fired by Nader for running a piece that he didn't authorize and THEN cried foul after words. Not to mention how having unions in non-profits is not even close to the same thing as a regular employer because money and resources are extremely scarce PLUS they are working for causes not for profit. That seems obvious enough and I posted a good piece a few months on just how tricky the subject of unions inside non-profits is. AND Nader has allowed some unions inside some of his groups which makes this claim look even more like bullshit....sorry, nice try.

The stocks claim is based on a fidelity portfolio and most people don't even know where their money is being directed in those cases. And at least any money he gets from those goes to great causes that hinder those corporations To me it's small beans compared to actually holding office and making vote that make it easier for your donors such as Obama has done with his credit card cap vote and the nuclear power legislation he watered down.

The rest is just personal attacks of no substance that you would expect to see on some horrid mudslinging campaign commercial.

Strangest Tribe wrote:

have you ever noticed when he talks ...little white frothy spittle collects on his lips???

has this guy gotten laid yet??

Posting in the 3rd person went out of style years ago.

Strangest Tribe wrote:

have you ever noticed when he talks ...little white frothy spittle collects on his lips???

has this guy gotten laid yet??

great point!!

What would Britney do?

Britney 08!

Strangest Tribe wrote:

have you ever noticed when he talks ...little white frothy spittle collects on his lips???

has this guy gotten laid yet??

I can see you have your priorities for achieving global harmony.all figured out...