Israel, US, and Abbas want peace...Hamas doesn't
Comments
-
mammasan wrote:Do you enjoy beating a dead horse? How many times and in different wording do I have to say that I agree with you that Israeli is brutal and excessive in their retalitory attacks.
And there's a reason I go on about this issue as much as I do. I think it represents the core of U.S - and largely western - hypocrisy and corruption in the world. It's the main flame fuelling much of the strife across the western world. It's a perfect example of our double standards and of the subservience of the media to big business and the government.0 -
mammasan wrote:I disagree. While the occupation is wrong targeting civilians is never acceptable in my book. They want to target Israeli military personel or instalations in these areas, I can understand that, but never civilians. And while the US and Israel are responsible for the illegal occupation, the attackers are also responsible for their actions. No one is forcing them to blow up buses or cafes or market places. Just as Israel and the US should be held accountable for their actions so should the terrorists. No one is without fault.
I don't actually agree with targeting civilians either. But I can understand why those in the occupied territories are seen as legitimate targets. These people knowingly move onto land which they know has been stolen from others. Their simply being there is almost an act of agression in itself.0 -
Byrnzie wrote:And there's a reason I go on about this issue as much as I do. I think it represents the core of U.S - and largely western - hypocrisy and corruption in the world. It's the main flame fuelling much of the strife across the western world. It's a perfect example of our double standards and of the subservience of the media to big business and the government.
But you are preaching to the choir. I agree with you on this point. Israel has largly been held unaccoutable for their actions while the Palestinians, in the US mostly, shoulder all the responsibility for the situation there."When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul0 -
Byrnzie wrote:I don't actually agree with targeting civilians either. But I can understand why those in the occupied territories are seen as legitimate targets. These people knowingly move onto land which they know has been stolen from others. Their simply being there is almost an act of agression in itself.
I understand why they are targeted but I will never be able to accept it. I believe that if these Palestinian organizations refrained from attacking Israeli civilians there would be no way that countries like the US could publically be able to support Israel's actions.
Lokk at the civil rights movement here in the states. had they resorted to violence and attacking white people the movement would not have accomplished anything. It would have only aided in further segregating and dehumanizing of the black population here. Since it was a peaceful movement and the oppressors almost always resorted to violence the movement gained support.
I'm not saying that the Palestinians need to sit around singing Kumbaya My Lord while Israeli tanks shells rain down on them, but definitely refrain from targeting civilians."When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul0 -
jlew24asu wrote:I have no idea why you keep avoiding it.
Avoiding it? Kind of like how you have avoided many of his posts in this topic including the one above the one you just quoted that responded to your post?jlew24asu wrote:I have and will continue to call out Israel when they are in the wrong. so you for to say I ignore Israel is pure bullshit. Israel is illegally occupying some land. Israel shouldn't have secret prisons. Israel retaliates much to harshly to hamas resistance.
That's the thing. You don't understand what I'm trying to say. I never said you agree with everything israel does. The thing about you, however, is (I feel like I repeat myself way too often) that you post an entire article and condemn everything Hamas does and stands for and your post is made up of just you attacking Hamas (and Byrnzie...) and then you throw in a little sentence that says "Oh, and Israel is wrong too." just to prove you "aren't biased." That's what the news media does, and that's what you do. It's wrong in both cases, and pretty much bullshit.
An example is your last post where you posted an entire thing abotu Hamas, and then threw in:feel free to post whatever links you want about Israel. I will call them out for being scumbags too. difference is, hamas can do no wrong in your eyes. pity.hamas ideology along with other islamic extremist groups is to kill themselves in the name of allah.
There aren't any such things as Israeli extremist groups or anything. That'd just be ridiculous. Only Muslims have extremist groups that kill themselves and civilians in the name of God. Not to mention the fact that they are trying to get their land and homes back. And stop an occupation that's claimed thousands of lives, and jailed countless more.
You act as if they have alternative ways to get their land back. Like they choose to do it this way.Israel is getting along just fine with fatah and the ENTIRE west bank. don't tell me Israel isnt capable of peace. up until this point hamas is not.
Quit avoiding Byrnzie's posts. He replied to this.first of all, I'll say whatever the fuck I want.
uh, go ahead. I wasn't actually telling you you aren't allowed to say what you want. I was trying to say what you are saying is false, and so you shouldn't say it anymore. If you don't mind spitting out bullshit, by all means do it. Just understand that at the end of the day, it's bullshit.second of all, hamas is the only party preventing peace.
That's the funny thing. You sit here pretending you aren't biased and just talk about how Israel is wrong too, but then just say something like this, which is completely untrue, and you know it. (unless you're just an idiot, but I like to hope that the poeple I debate with aren't idiots, otherwise i'm wasting my time here.)Israel has a right to exist regardless if you, byzine and hamas don't believe so. and I'm allow an opinion too, a valid one.
Neither me, nor ByRnzie, nor anyone said Israel doesn't have the right to exist. right now, when we refer to israel, we refer to the government and it's occupation that it has placed over Palestine. Not the people, not the "jews" (since I feel like you also sometimes try to make us out to be anti-semetic) and not any innocent people in Israel. Only the poeple that have violated many war crimes, and has played a role in the occupation do I see as wrong, and doesn't have the right to exist.
Once you understand that, AND PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT SO I DON'T HAVE TO WRITE THE SAME SHIT AGAIN, maybe you'll get what we are trying to say.
And I never said you aren't allowed an opinion. I just think you got your facts wrong.
Now, I'm really sick of saying this, and I didn't want this post to be too long, but you guys seriously need to understand this:
All I ever hear in criticism of Israel is "excessive defense attacks" when many of their attacks are not in defense, but offensive attacks. Byrnzie has posted tons of examples to this. You guys always seem to miss this point. Israel does not always defend itself, and most of the time it provokes the Palestinians.
Also, seeing as how Israel has targeted, jailed, and killed way more civilians, why are they not considered 'terrorists'? Isn't that what a 'terrorist' is? How come only Hamas are the 'terrorists' and Israel is just 'defending itself, but a little too much'?
Additionally, mammasan, I don't really think this is comparable to the Civil Rights movement at all. Blacks at the time were fighting so that there would be no more segregation, they weren't fighting for land and they weren't trying to get their homes back. It's a different situation.
It's more comparable to many of the comparisons that have been made in this topic that jlew shrugged off as "different time, different land, different people" or some other bullshit of that sort.
This post was longer than I wanted it to be...0 -
_FiveAgainstOne_ wrote:
This post was longer than I wanted it to be...
you goddamn right it is. I'm not going to waste my time breaking down your every sentence of what you like to call bullshit. its become a waste of time.
we can both sit here and reply to each other your posts with "this is all bullshit" and we wouldn't get to far would we?
praise allah0 -
Byrnzie wrote:Did you hear about a little scuffle that occured last year between Israel and Lebanon? About 1000 Lebanese civilians were killed. Oh, nevermind. I'm veering off track here. This is about Palestinian civilians being killed, right?
Palestinian children pay price of Israel's Summer Rain offensive
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1866460,00.html
'Rights group says 197 civilians have been killed in military operation, including 48 minors'
Palestinians Mourn Civilians Killed by Israel
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/10/world/middleeast/10mideast.html
'BEIT HANUN, Gaza, Nov. 9 — Palestinians marched in anger and mourning on Thursday for 18 civilians killed by Israeli artillery — baring for cameras the battered faces of two dead children.'
http://www.pchrgaza.org/files/PressR/English/2006/47-2006.htm
Seven Palestinian civilians killed on Gaza beach
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/jun2006/isra-j12.shtml
Civilians killed in Israeli raid
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/06/13/news/hamas.php
'GAZA: Israelis killed ten Palestinians, including two children, and wounded 30 in a missile strike on Tuesday on a van carrying militants and rockets in Gaza, the deadliest such attack in nearly four years.'
Four Palestinians killed in IDF raid in Gaza Strip
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/905702.html
Palestinians bury 18 civilians killed in Israeli artillery attack
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-11-09-israel-palestinians_x.htm
'BEIT HANOUN, Gaza Strip (AP) — Tens of thousands of grief-stricken, furious Gazans flocked to an artillery-scarred cluster of apartment buildings in the town of Beit Hanoun on Thursday to mourn 18 civilians killed when a barrage of Israeli shells tore through their homes.'
3 Palestinian civilians killed by IOF in the West Bank
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/905702.html
AT LEAST SEVEN PALESTINIAN CIVILIANS KILLED BY ISRAELI SHELLS IN GAZA
http://www.allbusiness.com/government/3707917-1.html
Deadliest Year in Palestinian Territories Since 1967 War
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0101-01.htm
'A total of 345 Palestinian civilians were killed by Israeli security forces in the territories during the course of the year, of whom 38 were under the age of 15.
It was also one of the deadliest years for Israelis living within the country's 1967 borders, according to the report. Seventy-nine Israeli civilians were killed within the 'Green Line' by Palestinians during the year.'
Israeli missiles hit house in Gaza.
http://forums.muslimvillage.net/index.php?showtopic=24514
Gaza women killed in mosque siege
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6112386.stm
'Two women have been killed as Israeli troops opened fire on a crowd of women gathered to help besieged gunmen flee a mosque in Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza.'
these are all disgusting acts of terrorism. Israel should know better then to copy the tactics of hamas.0 -
jlew24asu wrote:these are all disgusting acts of terrorism. Israel should know better then to copy the tactics hamas.
I think I just found a new signature. Can I quote you?
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
Interesting quote at the top of this flyer...
http://endtheoccupation.org/downloads/disengagement%20flyer.pdf0 -
Take Action: Oppose $30 Billion in Military Aid Package to Israel
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/uscampaign/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=12265
This is what we are protesting...
http://www.answering-islam.com/pali_torture.htm
http://endtheoccupation.org/downloads/disengagement%20flyer.pdf0 -
jlew24asu wrote:It's really sad to see. they are soo close. Hamas is clearly part of the problem and far from being part of the solution.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071012/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians
GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip - Hamas' top leaders in Gaza and Syria warned the moderate Palestinian president Friday not to "fall into the trap" of an upcoming U.S.-sponsored peace conference with Israel.
ADVERTISEMENT
Ismail Haniyeh, who was deposed as Palestinian prime minister after Hamas violently seized Gaza in June, urged President Mahmoud Abbas to mend his rift with the Islamic militant group and criticized him for planning to attend the peace conference next month.
"Don't fall into the trap of the coming conference. Don't make new compromises on Jerusalem, on our sovereignty," Haniyeh said, speaking to thousands of cheering supporters for the Muslim Eid al-Fitr holiday.
Hamas' Syria-based supreme leader, Khaled Mashaal, echoed the warning in his own holiday message, accusing Israel and the U.S. of taking advantage of the Palestinian rift to try to wrest concessions in peace negotiations.
Abbas retaliated for Hamas' takeover of the Gaza Strip by expelling the group from his government and setting up his own administration in the West Bank. Mashaal urged Abbas to accept the Islamists' invitations for dialogue.
Abbas and his allies "will find out that they are pursuing nothing but a mirage," Mashaal said on Hamas radio.
Israel and the Palestinians hope to present the contours of a final peace accord at the conference, tentatively set for Annapolis, Md., at the end of November.
I think the following comment answers your lame attempt at defending Israeli terrorism quite nicely...
"The significance of the disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace process...prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, and you prevent a discussion on refugees, the borders, and Jerusalem. Effectively, this whole package called the Palestinian state, with all that it entails, has been removed indefinitely from our agenda.."
Israeli PM Ariel Sharon's senior advisor Dov Weisglass during an interview published in Ha'aretz newspaper Friday magazine, Oct 8th, 2004.0 -
Byrnzie wrote:I think the following comment answers your lame attempt at defending Israeli terrorism quite nicely...
"The significance of the disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace process...prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, and you prevent a discussion on refugees, the borders, and Jerusalem. Effectively, this whole package called the Palestinian state, with all that it entails, has been removed indefinitely from our agenda.."
Israeli PM Ariel Sharon's senior advisor Dov Weisglass during an interview published in Ha'aretz newspaper Friday magazine, Oct 8th, 2004.
how about we deal with the present? that was over 3 years ago. and who knows if this 1 statement was taken out of context or what. who knows. lots of....in there.
I dont believe either of these guys have any influence on whats happening today. sharon is practically dead isnt he?0 -
jlew24asu wrote:how about we deal with the present? that was over 3 years ago. and who knows if this 1 statement was taken out of context or what. who knows. lots of....in there.
I dont believe either of these guys have any influence on whats happening today. sharon is practically dead isnt he?
Yeah, your probably right. Most of the top rank of the Israeli government have probably had a change of heart over the past couple of years. I mean, it certainly looks like they've all recently become eligible for sainthood.0 -
Byrnzie wrote:Yeah, your probably right. Most of the top rank of the Israeli government have probably had a change of heart over the past couple of years. I mean, it certainly looks like they've all recently become eligible for sainthood.
like I said, lets try and stick to the present instead of quoting advisors of former almost dead prime ministers.0 -
jlew24asu wrote:like I said, lets try and stick to the present instead of quoting advisors of former almost dead prime ministers.
O.k...
http://www.imemc.org/article/51101
'One Palestinian killed, four injured, as Israeli army shells Gaza
Friday October 26, 2007 11:52 by Nisreen Qumsieh - IMEMC News& agencies nisreen at imemc dot org
One Palestinian was killed, and another four injured, as the Israeli military shelled ash-Shija'iyeh neighborhood of Gaza city on Friday morning.
Local sources reported that an Israeli military jet opened fire on a group of Palestinians, killing Mohammad Hasnounah, 22, and injuring other four others.
Hasnounah is the fourth Palestinian to be killed by Israeli forces on Friday.'0 -
Byrnzie wrote:O.k...
http://www.imemc.org/article/51101
'One Palestinian killed, four injured, as Israeli army shells Gaza
Friday October 26, 2007 11:52 by Nisreen Qumsieh - IMEMC News& agencies nisreen at imemc dot org
One Palestinian was killed, and another four injured, as the Israeli military shelled ash-Shija'iyeh neighborhood of Gaza city on Friday morning.
Local sources reported that an Israeli military jet opened fire on a group of Palestinians, killing Mohammad Hasnounah, 22, and injuring other four others.
Hasnounah is the fourth Palestinian to be killed by Israeli forces on Friday.'
and this was in response to rocket attacks launched into Israel..
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/08/world/middleeast/08mideast.html0 -
jlew24asu wrote:and this was in response to rocket attacks launched into Israel..
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/08/world/middleeast/08mideast.html
No it wasn't. Your article is dated Oct. 7.0 -
Byrnzie wrote:No it wasn't. Your article is dated Oct. 7.
A few years back this topic was discussed on this board just like it is now. What you realise is that it goes no where.
My dads parents are 1949 refugees to Lebanon. He was born on the border while his parents were fleeing. I got accused of lying about it back then.
My mother is actually Lebanese and lives in Lebanon now and she experienced the attack last year, so did all her extended family. I went there in December and saw some of the damage that was caused. People fail to see that the Israelis struck deep into Christian areas. Areas which back in the civil war were sided with the Israelis. How do they explain their attacks? "Hizbullah presence"? Then you take a look at the number of Lebanese civilians killed compared to the number of Hizbullah fighters killed.. you compare that with the number of Israeli military personnel killed compared to their civilians and you wonder how Hizbullah were able to kill a higher ratio of military with their unsophisticated weaponry (relative to the Israelis). Then you wonder about striking the electric power plant in its oil depots contaminating all of the Lebanese coast when they could of simply struck any other region in the plant if they wanted to disable it. I can go on forever...
As a person whose origin is from that region I am not that optimistic. And its really sad because its so rich and beautiful.
Robert Fisk once mentioned thats there is a lot going on in the background that normal civilians dont know about. He interviewed a leader from Hamas once and the guy told him that both Hamas and Israeli goverment officials meet and discuss occasionally but they do it in secrecy because they both need to keep their appearances to their public.0 -
NoK wrote:A few years back this topic was discussed on this board just like it is now. What you realise is that it goes no where.
My dads parents are 1949 refugees to Lebanon. He was born on the border while his parents were fleeing. I got accused of lying about it back then.
My mother is actually Lebanese and lives in Lebanon now and she experienced the attack last year, so did all her extended family. I went there in December and saw some of the damage that was caused. People fail to see that the Israelis struck deep into Christian areas. Areas which back in the civil war were sided with the Israelis. How do they explain their attacks? "Hizbullah presence"? Then you take a look at the number of Lebanese civilians killed compared to the number of Hizbullah fighters killed.. you compare that with the number of Israeli military personnel killed compared to their civilians and you wonder how Hizbullah were able to kill a higher ratio of military with their unsophisticated weaponry (relative to the Israelis). Then you wonder about striking the electric power plant in its oil depots contaminating all of the Lebanese coast when they could of simply struck any other region in the plant if they wanted to disable it. I can go on forever...
As a person whose origin is from that region I am not that optimistic. And its really sad because its so rich and beautiful.
Robert Fisk once mentioned thats there is a lot going on in the background that normal civilians dont know about. He interviewed a leader from Hamas once and the guy told him that both Hamas and Israeli goverment officials meet and discuss occasionally but they do it in secrecy because they both need to keep their appearances to their public.
You're right. It goes nowhere. But I still can't sit back and tolerate people spouting lies, and half-truths, and even blatantly cheering the main catalyst in all of this. Someone needs to ping this bullshit back at them.0 -
NoK wrote:A few years back this topic was discussed on this board just like it is now. What you realise is that it goes no where.
My dads parents are 1949 refugees to Lebanon. He was born on the border while his parents were fleeing. I got accused of lying about it back then.
My mother is actually Lebanese and lives in Lebanon now and she experienced the attack last year, so did all her extended family. I went there in December and saw some of the damage that was caused. People fail to see that the Israelis struck deep into Christian areas. Areas which back in the civil war were sided with the Israelis. How do they explain their attacks? "Hizbullah presence"? Then you take a look at the number of Lebanese civilians killed compared to the number of Hizbullah fighters killed.. you compare that with the number of Israeli military personnel killed compared to their civilians and you wonder how Hizbullah were able to kill a higher ratio of military with their unsophisticated weaponry (relative to the Israelis). Then you wonder about striking the electric power plant in its oil depots contaminating all of the Lebanese coast when they could of simply struck any other region in the plant if they wanted to disable it. I can go on forever...
As a person whose origin is from that region I am not that optimistic. And its really sad because its so rich and beautiful.
Robert Fisk once mentioned thats there is a lot going on in the background that normal civilians dont know about. He interviewed a leader from Hamas once and the guy told him that both Hamas and Israeli goverment officials meet and discuss occasionally but they do it in secrecy because they both need to keep their appearances to their public.
and this is one of the exact reasons why I dislike Israel. they hit back much too aggressively0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help