Ron Paul on Larry King tonight..

mojamom
mojamom Posts: 8
edited January 2008 in A Moving Train
According to Ron Paul's campaign website, he will be on Larry King tonight at 9 PM. Just thought I'd pass it on.
05/03/03 State College, 07/12/03 Hershey, 09/28-29/04 Boston 1 & 2, 10/01/04 Reading, 10/08/04 Kissimee, 10/03/05 Philly, 5/12/06 Albany, 5/13/06 Hartford, 5/27/06 Camden , 5/28/06 Camden, 5/30/06 DC, 6/19-20/08 Camden 1 & 2, 6/22/08 DC
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    another ron paul thread. awesome.
  • Thecure
    Thecure Posts: 814
    I find it funny that every where i look i see Ron Paul, people keep saying that Ron Paul is not be talked about.
    People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
    - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)

    If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
    - Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    another ron paul thread. awesome.
    I had this feeling today that while I was reading Ron Paul Forums, news & checking in with meetup groups, that I was obsessing about his campaign similarly to how I obsessed about PJ after I saw them for the first time, State College 03. What a show! I was hooked! Could not get enough of PJ after that... still can't (please play South East)...

    anyway, I find myself hooked on Ron Paul. He's refreshingly honest, intelligent and consistent. I may not agree with all he says, but I know where he stands and I trust him.

    I even switched parties so that I could vote for him. Someone said on another post that those that learn about him, like what they see. That's why I started the thread. Maybe a few people will tune in and learn a little.

    "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none."

    - Thomas Jefferson

    Reminds me of Ron Paul.
    05/03/03 State College, 07/12/03 Hershey, 09/28-29/04 Boston 1 & 2, 10/01/04 Reading, 10/08/04 Kissimee, 10/03/05 Philly, 5/12/06 Albany, 5/13/06 Hartford, 5/27/06 Camden , 5/28/06 Camden, 5/30/06 DC, 6/19-20/08 Camden 1 & 2, 6/22/08 DC
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    mojamom wrote:
    I had this feeling today that while I was reading Ron Paul Forums, news & checking in with meetup groups, that I was obsessing about his campaign similarly to how I obsessed about PJ after I saw them for the first time, State College 03. What a show! I was hooked! Could not get enough of PJ after that... still can't (please play South East)...

    anyway, I find myself hooked on Ron Paul. He's refreshingly honest, intelligent and consistent. I may not agree with all he says, but I know where he stands and I trust him.

    I even switched parties so that I could vote for him. Someone said on another post that those that learn about him, like what they see. That's why I started the thread. Maybe a few people will tune in and learn a little.
    hey no worries. I'm just bustin some balls.
    mojamom wrote:
    "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none."

    - Thomas Jefferson

    Reminds me of Ron Paul.

    this is all well and nice until a group like the taliban take over a country. they want peaceful honest relationships with no one. and if you dont follow their breed of religion, the penalty is dead.
  • Thecure wrote:
    I find it funny that every where i look i see Ron Paul, people keep saying that Ron Paul is not be talked about.

    Funny how that is eh? Do you know what the people that say that are called?

    ;)
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • Marbles
    Marbles Posts: 49
    jlew24asu wrote:
    hey no worries. I'm just bustin some balls.



    this is all well and nice until a group like the taliban take over a country. they want peaceful honest relationships with no one. and if you dont follow their breed of religion, the penalty is dead.
    'eh, Baptists are on the same track as the Taliban. One group of zealots or another, whatever. Either one is out for blood, and doesn't give a damn, 'cause they think that they are on the inside track for the afterlife. (Wouldn't it be funny if there was a god who fucked all the zealots over in the afterlife for being know-it-all pricks?)
  • Well, SOMEONE FUCKED UP with the Larry King announcement, he WAS NOT ON,
    but he WAS ON WOLF BLITZER

    WOO HOO.

    :D
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Marbles wrote:
    'eh, Baptists are on the same track as the Taliban.
    no they're not
  • I'm not stuck on Ron Paul winning, he may.....he may not. It would not surprise me at all if he didn't, very little in the big picture actually changes. The US will learn from their mistakes and journey forward on their own just like every other country should be allowed to. Hopefully with more thinking and less bombing.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Amy Robach interviews Ron Paul on MSNBC's Countdown to Iowa (1/02/07)

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=KtNY4jaNW6w
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • ON CNN THIS MORNING.
    SITTING AT THE BOTTOM OF THE POLLS IN IOWA ?

    Yeah right.
    :(

    RIGHT IN LINE WITH THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPLES!

    FUCK YEAH.
    :D
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • Ron AND Carol Paul backstage
    RON PAUL PUTS A HIT OUT ON SNUFFALUFAGUS!

    Yeah.
    He PWNED that stupid little shill!

    I used to like that shark smiling smug little fuck too!
    Just a weasel ass punk though.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • ON CNN THIS MORNING.
    SITTING AT THE BOTTOM OF THE POLLS IN IOWA ?

    Yeah right.
    :(

    RIGHT IN LINE WITH THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPLES!

    FUCK YEAH.
    :D

    Whats this?!? a CNN reporter that actually asked RP informative questions and let him speak freely to the issues. Nice change from Wolf "cut you off mid sentence, have an enema, and take a stress pill" Blitzer.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Whats this?!? a CNN reporter that actually asked RP informative questions and let him speak freely to the issues. Nice change from Wolf "cut you off mid sentence, have an enema, and take a stress pill" Blitzer.

    reporters should be tough when asking questions. its annoying when you complain about your bf being hassled by big bad meany reporters.
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    reporters should be tough when asking questions. its annoying when you complain about your bf being hassled by big bad meany reporters.

    Does being tough include asking "will you run as an independent if you don't win the nomination?" EVERY time you interview someone?

    I'm not knocking Blitzer, because he actualy has given RP more spots than any other single news show period.

    But if you did a clip of that question alone, youd have about a 4 minute clip of Blitzer asking that about 12 different times. Fucking ridiculous.

    I hear you Jlew.
    As the media realizes it can no longer ignore him, and apparently conceding that it is having trouble even marginalizing him, the coverage is becoming more "fair".

    Hate to say it, but its true.

    However it would be foolish of you to try and pretend like he wasn't being ignored and marginalized for a LONG time.

    In fact, when he broke ALL existing 1 day fundraising records just last month there was media blackout.

    I think he got about ONE MINUTE COMBINED news coverage for it.
    :( :( :(

    What if hillary had pulled that feat?

    Yeah.
    exactly.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    jlew24asu wrote:
    this is all well and nice until a group like the taliban take over a country. they want peaceful honest relationships with no one. and if you dont follow their breed of religion, the penalty is dead.

    As much as seeing an opressive regime based on a fanatical perversion of religion pisses me off, unfortunetly it is none of our business. It should only become our business if that regime either attacks us, another country or is breaking international law (ie genocide). The only mistake the Taliban made was hosting Al Qaida and allowing them to operate within their borders. The Taliban never attacked another country. While they may have been the biggest bastards on this planet for the way the treated women, had they not aided Al Qaida we would have had no business going into that country.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • mammasan wrote:
    It should only become our business if that regime either attacks us, another country or is breaking international law (ie genocide).

    I don't even think we should step in if they attack another country.

    Now, on genocide, i may have to break with the good Dr.
    International law or not, we SHOULD stand for something, and genocide is certainly something that should be stopped.

    However, before getting involved militarily there are lots of other options to engage first!
    :D
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    mammasan wrote:
    As much as seeing an opressive regime based on a fanatical perversion of religion pisses me off, unfortunetly it is none of our business. It should only become our business if that regime either attacks us, another country or is breaking international law (ie genocide). The only mistake the Taliban made was hosting Al Qaida and allowing them to operate within their borders. The Taliban never attacked another country. While they may have been the biggest bastards on this planet for the way the treated women, had they not aided Al Qaida we would have had no business going into that country.

    I am all for less involvement in the worlds affairs but ron paul essentially wants none

    and I'm not talking about your run of the mill oppressive regime. I am talking about the Taliban (or similar Islamic extremist group). these groups will happily support and host a group like el queda.

    ron paul's repsonse is to be friends with them, talk to them, its none of our business what they do yada yada. thats insane.
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    I am all for less involvement in the worlds affairs but ron paul essentially wants none

    and I'm not talking about your run of the mill oppressive regime. I am talking about the Taliban (or similar Islamic extremist group). these groups will happily support and host a group like el queda.

    ron paul's repsonse is to be friends with them, talk to them, its none of our business what they do yada yada. thats insane.

    But it IS none of our business what they do, Jlew.
    What are you worried about?

    If we have infomation about immenent attacks, fuck yeah ... lets take some of em out.

    But if you are talking about "oppressive regimes", then WTF?

    Look around the world.
    Are we invading North Korea yet?
    I think King Dong Kill is MUCH more of a threat than the fucking taliban ... he has freaking nuclear weapons, for christ sake.

    Who cares about a bunch of cry baby sand loving dirt poor fucks with some AK47s in the desert.

    If they want a war, they will surely get it.

    Until they do so, lets let them be, and not go poking sticks at a beehive.

    ?


    BTW.
    it may help to clarify your gripe.
    You say "all for LESS involvement" but not "none" ...
    what do you think is appropriate here?
    Because all Ron Paul is saying is that we have no reason to leave troops in someone elses country based on simple fear that they may "do something".

    On that grounds, is it okay for Cuba to have an army stationed outside of New York, because the oppressive trade policy we have against Cuba is a threat to their national security, and they are worried we may actualy "do something"? How about Africa putting a whole batallion in the south, because they keep getting reports about some large state sponsored group called "The KKK" that has roots going back 100 years, that has been amassing arms and preaching hate for black people? Should Africa get to leave an army here because of some threat of "The KKK" attacking them?

    Seriously.
    WHAT do you think the taliban is going to pull over on us that sitting in the desert with guns and tanks and pissing off an entire country is going to cure?

    :()
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?