Bill Maher thinks you're a fucking loony

1356720

Comments

  • Spoken like everyone needs to hear it. The truth (well...except the moon part) :p

    part2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOWu8T8F5W4

    part3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJRetQUTEWA

    part4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLi1uvqKXNs
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,236
    This was great when I saw it the first time and it's even beter now.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    I have yet to hear one "official story" believer give me a legitimate reason for the pools of liquefied steel. Jet fuel can do that?

    hmm

    there was a helluva lot more than jet fuel in there chief. sure, drop a stell ingot in a pool of burning jet fuel and MAYBE the steel won't melt. but that's not what happened that day. a building already weakened by the sheer force of being broadsides by a huge passenger jet caught fire... there was burning jet fuel and it ignited everything on probably 10 floors in that building... wood, plastic, paper, plaster, etc. there was fresh oxygen being pumped in through the hole in the wall. wind to fan the flames. it's a little bit different environment than any lab experiment i ever heard of. seems utterly plausible to me. a helluva lot more plausible than a government conspiracy involving thousands of people none of whom spoke a word about the greatest atrocity perpetrated on our soil in american history.
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Bill Maher's full of shit. CNN make him out to be the voice of Liberal America, when in actual fact he's just another functionary.
    Not everbody who doubts the official story believes that the Government actually carried out the attacks, or that they brought down the twin towers e.t.c. In my opnion these things are a diversionary tactic to stop people simply realising that the Government possessed prior warning of the attacks and that they allowed them to happen. The evidence for this is indisputable.
  • Austicman
    Austicman Posts: 1,328
    spiral out wrote:
    Wow have you read the NIST report? where'd you get that info from?

    The what report?? Why can't you people believe what you saw?? All these news channels were showing the same pictures and reporting the same things as they happened. And evryone saw the second plane crash into the tower on live TV. What they've come up with after the fact is just selling airtime and papers.

    If the Government was responsible why say that Osama and his boys did it, make lame arse invasion of Afganistan and then head into Iraq with all their might. Why not just say Saddam did it go after him and be done with it?
    I can't go the library anymore, everyone STINKS!!
  • I want to know what melted the steel. How much have you studied the findings?

    A lot?
    yes i have studied them alot before they removed alot of the information from the internet but i'm not about to get into it with you...you're sorta hard headed and this will go on for days. one thing i will say is not even the devil is evil enough to concoct a plan of that magnitude and people that believe the conspiracy theories are screwed together very loosely.
    Oh dear dad
    Can you see me now
    I am myself
    Like you somehow
    I'll ride the wave
    Where it takes me
    I'll hold the pain
    Release me
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    yes i have studied them alot before they removed alot of the information from the internet but i'm not about to get into it with you...you're sorta hard headed and this will go on for days. one thing i will say is not even the devil is evil enough to concoct a plan of that magnitude and people that believe the conspiracy theories are screwed together very loosely.

    And people that place all the 'conspiracy theorists' within the same bracket are also delusional. The government had prior warning, and detailed knowlege of the plans for the attacks, and they did nothing. No combat aircraft were scrambled for the first time out of 100 routine scramblings that year. Coincidence? Dream on.
    The Neo cons wanted a new Pearl Harbour, and they got one.
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Byrnzie wrote:
    And people that place all the 'conspiracy theorists' within the same bracket are also delusional. The government had prior warning, and detailed knowlege of the plans for the attacks, and they did nothing. No combat aircraft were scrambled for the first time out of 100 routine scramblings that year. Coincidence? Dream on.
    The Neo cons wanted a new Pearl Harbour, and they got one.

    i might be willing to consider that theory. but the whole "there were no planes and it was a bomb in the building" nonsense is ridiculous. my first thought when the towers went down was 'dubya is untouchable now and we're in deep shit.' i'm not sure he personally was in on it, but i can easily see some of the characters surrounding him turning a blind eye to this to become politically invincible. he was the perfect puppet too becos he is such an ideologue his sincerity would cover the shady stuff going on behind the scenes.
  • when bush testifies under oath and allows noteworthy scientists to testify and a non partisan commnitee makes an official finding....

    maybe we can drop it.

    still doesn't discount that a Bush was head of security at the WTC and jet fuel isn't hot enough to melt steel.
  • there was a helluva lot more than jet fuel in there chief. sure, drop a stell ingot in a pool of burning jet fuel and MAYBE the steel won't melt. but that's not what happened that day. a building already weakened by the sheer force of being broadsides by a huge passenger jet caught fire... there was burning jet fuel and it ignited everything on probably 10 floors in that building... wood, plastic, paper, plaster, etc. there was fresh oxygen being pumped in through the hole in the wall. wind to fan the flames. it's a little bit different environment than any lab experiment i ever heard of. seems utterly plausible to me. a helluva lot more plausible than a government conspiracy involving thousands of people none of whom spoke a word about the greatest atrocity perpetrated on our soil in american history.


    Jet fuel cannot burn hot enough to melt steel. This is why pots don't melt when you cook on a gas stove. Oxygen rich fires produce very little smoke and lots of flame. Neither were present or observed.

    Anyone else want to try this question?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • yes i have studied them alot before they removed alot of the information from the internet but i'm not about to get into it with you...you're sorta hard headed and this will go on for days. one thing i will say is not even the devil is evil enough to concoct a plan of that magnitude and people that believe the conspiracy theories are screwed together very loosely.

    It's because you can't explain it. Don't kid yourself.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,236
    Jet fuel cannot burn hot enough to melt steel. This is why pots don't melt when you cook on a gas stove. Oxygen rich fires produce very little smoke and lots of flame. Neither were present or observed.

    Anyone else want to try this question?

    They're under the illusion that the planes hitting the building weakened the steel. Then the preceding fires apparently melted the steel and down goes the the buildings just like "down goes Frazier". :confused:

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • Byrnzie wrote:
    And people that place all the 'conspiracy theorists' within the same bracket are also delusional. The government had prior warning, and detailed knowlege of the plans for the attacks, and they did nothing. No combat aircraft were scrambled for the first time out of 100 routine scramblings that year. Coincidence? Dream on.
    The Neo cons wanted a new Pearl Harbour, and they got one.

    Bill Mahr denounces 9/11 just like Alex Jones admits he cannot talk openly or negatively about Zionism.

    They both know will lose their voice and be shut down....and promptly.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • g under p wrote:
    They're under the illusion that the planes hitting the building weakened the steel. Then the preceding fires apparently melted the steel and down goes the the buildings just like "down goes Frazier". :confused:

    Peace

    A large portion of the jet fuel burned off outside the buildings, and what remained inside burned up within a few minutes.

    So essentially all the jet fuel did in this equation was serve as a means to ignite a basic office fire. Firemen on the scene at the floors confirmed this, that indeed the fire was isolated and easily manageable.

    From the outside the lack of flames, and heavy black smoke, would in fact confirm this.

    So again where are the steel melting temperatures coming from?

    anyone?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • parrot....
    Take me piece by piece.....
    Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
  • parrot....


    Grow up...get over yourself man.. You lost an argument.... big deal ...let your ego heal already. It's a day later
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    So again where are the steel melting temperatures coming from?

    anyone?

    Steel didn't have to melt for the towers to collapse it just had to weaken.

    Booyah!
  • 69charger wrote:
    Steel didn't have to melt for the towers to collapse it just had to weaken.

    Booyah!


    Ok...maybe I just imagined typing it a few times now...what melted the steel then?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Ok...maybe I just imagined typing it a few times now...what melted the steel then?
    ok ill ask....

    what do YOU believe caused the buildings to collapse????

    in your opinion.....what events took place in order for those buildings to collapse???
    Take me piece by piece.....
    Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,236
    69charger wrote:
    Steel didn't have to melt for the towers to collapse it just had to weaken.

    Booyah!

    Unbelievable that you could say this and believe this. Wow

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)