Bill Maher thinks you're a fucking loony

1…1416181920

Comments

  • Austicman
    Austicman Posts: 1,328
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    No oxygen...no heat. Pressure alone is not going to do it.

    How no oxygen theres and maze of tunnels under there where oxygen can be sucked through.
    I can't go the library anymore, everyone STINKS!!
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Austicman wrote:
    How no oxygen theres and maze of tunnels under there where oxygen can be sucked through.


    Sucked through after a 110 story building has densely compacted into it?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    soulsinging wrote:
    still going, nothing outlasts the rolanddrummer. he keeps going, and going, and going, and going...

    Cme up with something or otherwise concede.

    You have to admit it's one hell of a good point.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Austicman
    Austicman Posts: 1,328
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Sucked through after a 110 story building has densely compacted into it?

    yeah dude!! very possible
    I can't go the library anymore, everyone STINKS!!
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Austicman wrote:
    yeah dude!! very possible


    All that dust debris and you think really so? That pit was plugged solid. A lot of building came down there my friend.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    All that dust debris and you think really so? That pit was plugged solid. A lot of building came down there my friend.

    not just building. :(
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • Austicman
    Austicman Posts: 1,328
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    All that dust debris and you think really so? That pit was plugged solid. A lot of building came down there my friend.

    So you have evidence of that? Isn't that what you ask everyone else?
    I can't go the library anymore, everyone STINKS!!
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Cme up with something or otherwise concede.

    You have to admit it's one hell of a good point.

    i answered it long ago. and you never did get round to actually responding to my points. not that i care much anymore. you've got an ideology to defend, reason is useless against that. i know from years of debating christians. enjoy your theories.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    soulsinging wrote:
    i answered it long ago. and you never did get round to actually responding to my points.

    I don't think you did, and I think I did a post or two later.... I remember correctly.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Austicman wrote:
    So you have evidence of that? Isn't that what you ask everyone else?


    What does common sense tell you? All that building compacted down into it's own footprint and it was a loose fill?

    right...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    I don't think you did, and I think I did a post or two later.... I remember correctly.

    no, you said "jet fuel couldn't do it" which had nothing to do with my points. when i pointed that out, you said "oh yeah, i already answered." you're as good as dubya at ignoring the actual question and just answering the question you want becos it helps your cause the most.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    soulsinging wrote:
    no, you said "jet fuel couldn't do it" which had nothing to do with my points. when i pointed that out, you said "oh yeah, i already answered." you're as good as dubya at ignoring the actual question and just answering the question you want becos it helps your cause the most.


    And nothing talked about afterwards has since touched upon on your question? I find that hard to believe.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    And nothing talked about afterwards has since touched upon on your question? I find that hard to believe.

    i stopped reading. by the time i came back from my real life the thread had doubled and i don't care enough to catch up anymore. i'm not going to change your mind and your armchair science isn't going to help me.

    what is your profession? are you a geologist? engineer? physics phd? if not, is any of the shit you're spouting stuff you actually know? or are you just lifting points from loose change and anonymous scientific you found "online" by people who most likely have never been anywhere near the site of the collapse?
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    soulsinging wrote:
    i stopped reading. by the time i came back from my real life the thread had doubled and i don't care enough to catch up anymore. i'm not going to change your mind and your armchair science isn't going to help me.

    what is your profession? are you a geologist? engineer? physics phd? if not, is any of the shit you're spouting stuff you actually know? or are you just lifting points from loose change and anonymous scientific you found "online" by people who most likely have never been anywhere near the site of the collapse?

    lol...I knew it..
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • MakingWaves
    MakingWaves Posts: 1,294
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    What does common sense tell you? All that building compacted down into it's own footprint and it was a loose fill?

    right...

    Well first off it didn't come close to falling within its own footprint.

    Try again.
    Seeing visions of falling up somehow.

    Pensacola '94
    New Orleans '95
    Birmingham '98
    New Orleans '00
    New Orleans '03
    Tampa '08
    New Orleans '10 - Jazzfest
    New Orleans '16 - Jazzfest
    Fenway Park '18
    St. Louis '22
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    What does common sense tell you? All that building compacted down into it's own footprint and it was a loose fill?

    right...

    my common sense tells me that yes when those buildings collapsed there is no way the debris collapsed perfectly to eliminate all pockets of air.
    if it did then i would have cause to be suspicious. we are not talking about a jigsaw here. we are talking about two 110 story buildings, each hit by a plane, falling in on itself. we are talking about exceptional circumstances.

    come on roland, surely you've seen the results of the destruction of a building. tis not nice and neat. it's messy.

    no one is saying ALL the debris fell within the buildings' footprints. what we are saying is that yes tis possible that pockets of oxygen were present, which in turn made it possible for a fire to be fueled.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    lol...I knew it..

    knew that i'm unconvinced by your negative proofs? yeah, i've amde that pretty clear. you can't make me believe that creationism is true by poking at a few holes in evolution, and you can't make me believe dick cheney personally blew up the WTC by saying that the biggest disaster in american history has produced a few puzzles that scientists are still working on figuring out.
  • Austicman
    Austicman Posts: 1,328
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    What does common sense tell you? All that building compacted down into it's own footprint and it was a loose fill?

    right...

    Yeah right!!! Just as believeable as your 'plug' theory. Its no use trying to talk sense with you dude. And for you to try and talk about 'common sense' is the most laughable thing I've read in this whole thread. thats saying something considering the crap thats in this thread.
    I can't go the library anymore, everyone STINKS!!
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    soulsinging wrote:
    knew that i'm unconvinced by your negative proofs? yeah, i've amde that pretty clear. you can't make me believe that creationism is true by poking at a few holes in evolution, and you can't make me believe dick cheney personally blew up the WTC by saying that the biggest disaster in american history has produced a few puzzles that scientists are still working on figuring out.

    Ok that's fine...but what exactly does that change?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Austicman wrote:
    Yeah right!!! Just as believeable as your 'plug' theory. Its no use trying to talk sense with you dude. And for you to try and talk about 'common sense' is the most laughable thing I've read in this whole thread. thats saying something considering the crap thats in this thread.

    And you know better? how exactly?

    Oh...ok...right...I think I know where the air is coming from now ;)
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")

Categories