Why is Iran's nuclear energy program Ilegal...

RolandTD20Kdrummer
RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
edited August 2008 in A Moving Train
According to Barak Obama?

anyone?

I'd like to get some clarification on this one...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.

http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13456

Comments

  • flywallyfly
    flywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    According to Barak Obama?

    anyone?

    I'd like to get some clarification on this one...

    It's not just Obama who says this. Pretty much every "leading" politician and TV water carrier says this as well. I've never seen anything that points to nuclear reactors in themselves as illegal. Now if it could be proven that they were making weapons from them then perhaps the illegality could be argued from the nuclear nonproliferation treaty they signed. But proving something seems to be an annoying thing to this nation lately.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    flywallyfly wrote:
    It's not just Obama who says this. Pretty much every "leading" politician and TV water carrier says this as well. I've never seen anything that points to nuclear reactors in themselves as illegal. Now if it could be proven that they were making weapons from them then perhaps the illegality could be argued from the nuclear nonproliferation treaty they signed. But proving something seems to be an annoying thing to this nation lately.


    I thought Barak was supposedly different from "every leading politician" so to speak, and this was the main attraction from his avid supporters Vote for a change in policy they say...

    I'm just not seeing it.

    It's one step forward...one step back.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • fuck
    fuck Posts: 4,069
    flywallyfly wrote:
    It's not just Obama who says this. Pretty much every "leading" politician and TV water carrier says this as well. I've never seen anything that points to nuclear reactors in themselves as illegal. Now if it could be proven that they were making weapons from them then perhaps the illegality could be argued from the nuclear nonproliferation treaty they signed. But proving something seems to be an annoying thing to this nation lately.
    oh, of course. It's fine for Obama to be full of shit, as long as the other "leading" politicians are full of shit.

    Now I see the funny side.
  • flywallyfly
    flywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    _outlaw wrote:
    oh, of course. It's fine for Obama to be full of shit, as long as the other "leading" politicians are full of shit.

    Now I see the funny side.

    You sure like to read into things that are not there. You must really hate Obama and his supporters. I almost feel bad for you.
  • flywallyfly
    flywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    I thought Barak was supposedly different from "every leading politician" so to speak, and this was the main attraction from his avid supporters Vote for a change in policy they say...

    I'm just not seeing it.

    It's one step forward...one step back.

    I was actually agreeing with you, just elaborating that it isnt confined to just him. This place is really starting to suck ass.
  • fuck
    fuck Posts: 4,069
    flywallyfly wrote:
    You sure like to read into things that are not there.
    I'm not claiming you said that. I'm responding to what you said with my own response. However, it certainly does seem that most Obama supporters defend his stance on Iran, and even justify it... how do you feel about his stance on Iran?
    You must really hate Obama and his supporters. I almost feel bad for you.
    You sure like to read into things that are not there.

    ;)
  • flywallyfly
    flywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    _outlaw wrote:
    I'm not claiming you said that.

    really? I guess quoting "leading" like i did was just a coincidence.
  • fuck
    fuck Posts: 4,069
    flywallyfly wrote:
    really? I guess quoting "leading" like i did was just a coincidence.
    way to ignore the rest of my response. It was clearly a remark, that was just sarcastically continuing what I thought you would be saying.

    Now, I'll ask again... what do you think about Obama's stance on Iran?
  • DriftingByTheStorm
    DriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    I'm not talking about what you're talking about.
    I'm saying that what you're saying isn't what you were saying first, and what i'm saying isn't what i was saying first, it's what i was saying about what you were saying when i thought what you were saying was not what i was saying.

    but now that i understand what you are saying, i still don't necessarily agree with you, but i do get what you were trying to say.

    See what i'm saying?

    :D:D:D
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • Rhinocerous Surprise
    Rhinocerous Surprise Posts: 4,423
    DriftingByTheStorm wrote:
    I'm not talking about what you're talking about.
    I'm saying that what you're saying isn't what you were saying first, and what i'm saying isn't what i was saying first, it's what i was saying about what you were saying when i thought what you were saying was not what i was saying.

    but now that i understand what you are saying, i still don't necessarily agree with you, but i do get what you were trying to say.

    See what i'm saying?

    :D:D:D
    I'm pretty certain this post punched a hole through time. :p
    Smokey Robinson constantly looks like he's trying to act natural after being accused of farting.
  • MrBrian
    MrBrian Posts: 2,672
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    According to Barak Obama?

    anyone?

    I'd like to get some clarification on this one...

    Yeah we all know it's not ilegal for them. They signed the NPT..unlike say Israel. ;)
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    DriftingByTheStorm wrote:
    I'm not talking about what you're talking about.
    I'm saying that what you're saying isn't what you were saying first, and what i'm saying isn't what i was saying first, it's what i was saying about what you were saying when i thought what you were saying was not what i was saying.

    but now that i understand what you are saying, i still don't necessarily agree with you, but i do get what you were trying to say.

    See what i'm saying?

    :D:D:D

    Oh...THAT Iran....

    I though you meant the OTHER Iran...

    simple misunderstanding...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • flywallyfly
    flywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    _outlaw wrote:
    Now, I'll ask again... what do you think about Obama's stance on Iran?

    What are you asking? Be clear for God's sake.
  • fuck
    fuck Posts: 4,069
    flywallyfly wrote:
    What are you asking? Be clear for God's sake.
    be clear?

    what is your opinion on his stance? do you agree with it or not? why or why not?
    do I have to spell it out for you, that question was pretty straightforward.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    flywallyfly wrote:
    I was actually agreeing with you, just elaborating that it isnt confined to just him. This place is really starting to suck ass.

    What does it have to do with here? It's a pretty universal question no?

    Can I not comment on things that don't add up?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • flywallyfly
    flywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    _outlaw wrote:
    be clear?

    what is your opinion on his stance? do you agree with it or not? why or why not?
    do I have to spell it out for you, that question was pretty straightforward.

    I like the way he stands in general though he sometimes leans too much on the podium during lengthy speeches. I'm not sure if I can really disagree with his stance as long as he finds it comfortable. I'm more of a lean on one leg for awhile then switch to keep one leg fresh, but that's debateable as well.
  • flywallyfly
    flywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    What does it have to do with here? It's a pretty universal question no?

    Can I not comment on things that don't add up?

    Sure you can.
  • Rhinocerous Surprise
    Rhinocerous Surprise Posts: 4,423
    flywallyfly wrote:
    I like the way he stands in general though he sometimes leans too much on the podium during lengthy speeches. I'm not sure if I can really disagree with his stance as long as he finds it comfortable. I'm more of a lean on one leg for awhile then switch to keep one leg fresh, but that's debateable as well.
    Haha, wow... you're not even trying to hide the fact that you don't wanna answer the question.
    Smokey Robinson constantly looks like he's trying to act natural after being accused of farting.
  • fuck
    fuck Posts: 4,069
    flywallyfly wrote:
    I like the way he stands in general though he sometimes leans too much on the podium during lengthy speeches. I'm not sure if I can really disagree with his stance as long as he finds it comfortable. I'm more of a lean on one leg for awhile then switch to keep one leg fresh, but that's debateable as well.
    thanks for proving my point.
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    If this administration was fair with their labeling and catagorizing of "Terrorist" states, they would of course list themselves......the government of the United States Of America; as a ......... Terrorist State.


    For it is the government of the United States that has done and continues to do those things that they accuse Iran of doing. You know, those things that by their own terms of definition.........define Iran as a Terrorist State.

Categories