Fox 5 news logo injects McCain and wife subliminally

RolandTD20Kdrummer
RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
edited May 2008 in A Moving Train
freaky nutters...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSAOQuLxSdY
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.

http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Skitch Patterson
    Skitch Patterson Posts: 642
    Copied the comment already left on youtube...


    Wow you people are stupid as all fucking hell. That is the worst editing job I have ever seen. Notice how when the clip starts he says "Right now, on fox 5 news at 10" then the audio IMMEDIATELY cuts out and it goes to the news casters? Not only is that an obvious cut/copy/paste job, but look at the time on the bottom left hand side under the logo. 10:14.

    The beginning of the clip was at the top of the hour, 10. When it shows the casters, its coming back from a commercial break at 10:14.


    In other words, before edited, the graphic cuts away to reveal McCain, as the top story for the night... and the editor cuts it to a different story.... that took place at 10:14... not 10.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Skitch Patterson wrote:
    Copied the comment already left on youtube...


    Wow you people are stupid as all fucking hell. That is the worst editing job I have ever seen. Notice how when the clip starts he says "Right now, on fox 5 news at 10" then the audio IMMEDIATELY cuts out and it goes to the news casters? Not only is that an obvious cut/copy/paste job, but look at the time on the bottom left hand side under the logo. 10:14.

    The beginning of the clip was at the top of the hour, 10. When it shows the casters, its coming back from a commercial break at 10:14.


    In other words, before edited, the graphic cuts away to reveal McCain, as the top story for the night... and the editor cuts it to a different story.... that took place at 10:14... not 10.

    I saw that one...you had to read a little more into it... the guy did edit it for a project he was doing...just not the logo sequence..
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Skitch Patterson
    Skitch Patterson Posts: 642
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    I saw that one...you had to read a little more into it... the guy did edit it for a project he was doing...just not the logo sequence..


    yeah, but if he edited immediately following the logo sequence, its very likely that the top story was McCain related, and it would have been the scene that flows AFTER the graphic. The fact of the matter is, the guy edited it to look like it was the intro to the news, and then jumped 14 minutes into the newscast.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Skitch Patterson wrote:
    yeah, but if he edited immediately following the logo sequence, its very likely that the top story was McCain related, and it would have been the scene that flows AFTER the graphic. The fact of the matter is, the guy edited it to look like it was the intro to the news, and then jumped 14 minutes into the newscast.


    You might be right....I forgot that Fox news is a great outlet for unbiased information.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    You might be right....I forgot that Fox news is a great outlet for unbiased information.
    fair and balanced
  • Skitch Patterson
    Skitch Patterson Posts: 642
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    You might be right....I forgot that Fox news is a great outlet for unbiased information.


    So someone can be just as biased, and just as deceitful... but its okay cause its fox?

    There are plenty of things to call fox on, so editing fake shit is pretty ridiculous...


    but i suppose manipulating footage to prove your point is okay if it fits YOUR idealogy... but if fox does it, its bad?

    fuckin hypocrite.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Skitch Patterson wrote:
    So someone can be just as biased, and just as deceitful... but its okay cause its fox?

    There are plenty of things to call fox on, so editing fake shit is pretty ridiculous...


    but i suppose manipulating footage to prove your point is okay if it fits YOUR idealogy... but if fox does it, its bad?

    fuckin hypocrite.


    Tell someone they might be right and they get all cranky...sigh...

    Anyhow thanks for the "fucking hypocrite" sentiment... Skitch..
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Skitch Patterson
    Skitch Patterson Posts: 642
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Tell someone they might be right and they get all cranky...sigh...

    Anyhow thanks for the "fucking hypocrite" sentiment... Skitch..


    Your passive aggressive condescending bullshit does not pass as "telling someone they might be right"

    why dont you just admit you fell for a poorly edited peace of propaganda footage, and posted it as truth.

Categories