Why people on the Train need to stop talking about Ron Paul
Commy
Posts: 4,984
Because its getting old and he's not going to win.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
but it's so much fun.If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?0 -
How about I turn every Ron Paul thread into a debate about mathematics, like this one http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=269127&page=5The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance,
but the illusion of knowledge.
~Daniel Boorstin
Only a life lived for others is worth living.
~Albert Einstein0 -
haha, nice.0
-
you're right. let's forget paul and start worshipping mccain and hillary.i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam0
-
baraka wrote:How about I turn every Ron Paul thread into a debate about mathematics, like this one http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=269127&page=5
How did we get from Libertarian policies to Euclidian Geometry and Einstein's String Theory?My Girlfriend said to me..."How many guitars do you need?" and I replied...."How many pairs of shoes do you need?" She got really quiet.0 -
Pacomc79 wrote:How did we get from Libertarian policies to Euclidian Geometry and Einstein's String Theory?
I have no idea and it got too far gone to reel it back in.The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance,
but the illusion of knowledge.
~Daniel Boorstin
Only a life lived for others is worth living.
~Albert Einstein0 -
Plus would American's really elect a guy whose title would be President Paul, it sounds like when you go to a chiropractor or a dentist and since they know they are not a full MD they call themselves Doctor Bobby or something.0
-
DriftingByTheStorm wrote:but it's so much fun.
so is shooting rabbits with a bb gun... doesn't mean I do it very often."If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
—Dorothy Parker
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg0 -
Commy wrote:Because its getting old and he's not going to win.
but the more hype ron paul gets, the more votes he'll suck away from other GOP candidates.
It's payback time!"If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
—Dorothy Parker
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg0 -
i think i am officially in ron paul shock.
i like the guy and all, but i like biden better (even though he's out) and you don't see me posting 34 joe biden threads a week. i don't think he even had 34 threads total in the last year."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
baraka wrote:How about I turn every Ron Paul thread into a debate about mathematics, like this one http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=269127&page=5This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.0
-
Agreed lets talk about war strategy and getting f-ed in the ass by govt instead.Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
Kel Varnsen wrote:Plus would American's really elect a guy whose title would be President Paul, it sounds like when you go to a chiropractor or a dentist and since they know they are not a full MD they call themselves Doctor Bobby or something.
that's hilarious. Never thought of that.everybody wants the most they can possibly get
for the least they could possibly do0 -
godpt3 wrote:but the more hype ron paul gets, the more votes he'll suck away from other GOP candidates.
It's payback time!
I'm confused. Is he running as an independent?everybody wants the most they can possibly get
for the least they could possibly do0 -
i haven't yet found where the RonBots have their off switch.0
-
If RP was more pro war he'd get a better following.
He's to soft on the war stance, and a lot of people don't like that.Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:If RP was more pro war he'd get a better following.
He's to soft on the war stance, and a lot of people don't like that.
Id say thats totally incorrect. His "stance" on the war is anything but "soft."
He has been pretty straight forward and "hard"line in what his beliefs regarding the war is.
Count on Roland to make me veer from my original intention when i read a thread....
and that is... This is by far Commy's best post ever.0 -
Skitch Patterson wrote:Id say thats totally incorrect. His "stance" on the war is anything but "soft."
He has been pretty straight forward and "hard"line in what his beliefs regarding the war is.
Count on Roland to make me veer from my original intention when i read a thread....
and that is... This is by far Commy's best post ever.
Just come home...pull all the roops out everywhere in every country.
Sounds like a really tough war stance to me.
umm...so what was your original intention? (seeing as you seem to be wanting to be asked).Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:Just come home...pull all the roops out everywhere in every country.
Sounds like a really tough war stance to me.
umm...so what was your original intention? (seeing as you seem to be wanting to be asked).
His "stance" is pretty hard. It has not wavered and has been solid from the beginning.
and my original point i made... This thread is commy's best ever.0 -
Skitch Patterson wrote:His "stance" is pretty hard. It has not wavered and has been solid from the beginning.
and my original point i made... This thread is commy's best ever.
He doesn't exude that sentiment at all. I think if you polled the average American, few to none would see what you're saying.
Why should people stop talking about one of the most controversial candidates in a very long time?
I don't get it. So what if someone doesn't like the guy? Don't click...not exactly a very difficult decision.
I could care less about what color of jelly beans people prefer, it doesn't make me want to encourage them to change colors if they don't like mine in particular.
Why should someone else? and why do you support them is perhaps a better question.
That's why I asked what your real intentions were.Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help