Britain's In.........

245

Comments

  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    spiral out wrote:
    It's going to happen.

    depends on what you are talking about. invasion and regime change? no chance. bombing nuke sites. possible yes. but even that is unlikely.
  • LikeAnOpeningBandForTheSun
    LikeAnOpeningBandForTheSun Posts: 6,097
    who are we gonna invade Iran with? We don't have anymore troops!

    rattle those sabres!
  • 810wmb
    810wmb Posts: 849
    jlew24asu wrote:
    depends on what you are talking about. invasion and regime change? no chance. bombing nuke sites. possible yes. but even that is unlikely.

    i agree...but i hope he does bomb the nuke sites...israel will prob do it
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • blackredyellow
    blackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    810wmb wrote:
    i agree...but i hope he does bomb the nuke sites...israel will prob do it

    Is it ok for them to bomb our nuke sites?

    This whole nuclear pissing match and anti-proliferation thing just seems like such bullshit because the whole time we are sitting on (and still producing) enough nuclear weapons to blow up the world 1000x over.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • 810wmb
    810wmb Posts: 849
    blackredyellow wrote:
    Is it ok for them to bomb our nuke sites?

    This whole nuclear pissing match and anti-proliferation thing just seems like such bullshit because the whole time we are sitting on (and still producing) enough nuclear weapons to blow up the world 1000x over.

    if they wanna try, let them

    if terrorist had a nuke, don't you think they would have dropped that on 9/11?

    if iran gets one don't you think they would use it? or put the big threat out?

    sheessh


    we don't need to destroy the world a 1000 times over, just a teenie bit in iran!
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Maybe change US foreign policy after Iran...

    ...or the next Country after that perhaps
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    810wmb wrote:
    i agree...but i hope he does bomb the nuke sites...israel will prob do it

    Do we even know if they are enriching uranium for the purpose of making nuclear weapons? From the last report I heard the Iranian government is cooperating with the IAEA. This leads me to belive that their claims of enriching uranium for energy purposes are probably true.

    So if Iran is cooperating with the IAEA then what is the real reason behind all of this invasion tough talk from the US and UK. Is their an alterior motive behind our desire to invade Iran? Does petro currency mean anything to anyone.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Neo-con hysteria runs rampant in America.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Chronology of Key Events Related to the Implementation of IAEA Safeguards in Iran:

    http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/week/060120.htm
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • spiral out
    spiral out Posts: 1,052
    jlew24asu wrote:
    depends on what you are talking about. invasion and regime change? no chance. bombing nuke sites. possible yes. but even that is unlikely.

    yes the bombing of nuke sites.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • spiral out
    spiral out Posts: 1,052
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Neo-con hysteria runs rampant in America.

    So true.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    mammasan wrote:
    Do we even know if they are enriching uranium for the purpose of making nuclear weapons? From the last report I heard the Iranian government is cooperating with the IAEA. This leads me to belive that their claims of enriching uranium for energy purposes are probably true.

    So if Iran is cooperating with the IAEA then what is the real reason behind all of this invasion tough talk from the US and UK. Is their an alterior motive behind our desire to invade Iran? Does petro currency mean anything to anyone.


    let's not quibble and allow facts to get in the way.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    spiral out wrote:
    What do you think of the independent?

    The Independent is the best U.K paper in my experience.
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    Byrnzie wrote:
    The Independent is the best U.K paper in my experience.

    i would iamgine any newspaper robert fisk chooses to grace with his presence would be worth my while.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    FinsburyParkCarrots wrote:
    Aye. I'd even take the Dian'y Express over the Torygraph.

    I still remember being at a - now ex - mates house years ago on a Sunday and he had a copy of the Telegraph. The feature article of one of the sections was entitled 'Tea with Pinochet', and described an afternoon's quaint tea drinking and chit-chat between Margaret Thatcher and Augusto Pinochet whilst Pinochet was 'imprisoned' briefly at some stately mansion somewhere in England. I remember reading it with my mouth open, in awe of it's audaciousness. I the got into an argument with my friend over his buying the Telegraph and I think it was the last time I saw him.
    I've since read of countless examples of where the Telegraph has deliberately lied, smeared people, and twisted the truth to sell it's Tory agenda.
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    catefrances wrote:
    i would iamgine any newspaper robert fisk chooses to grace with his presence would be worth my while.

    Yeah, true. I did like reading the Guardian for a while but it became a bit skewered and boring. I liked George Monbiot's column in the Guardian. The Independent has bigger balls though.
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I still remember being at a - now ex - mates house years ago on a Sunday and he had a copy of the Telegraph. The feature article of one of the sections was entitled 'Tea with Pinochet', and described an afternoon's quaint tea drinking and chit-chat between Margaret Thatcher and Augusto Pinochet whilst Pinochet was 'imprisoned' briefly at some stately mansion somewhere in England. I remember reading it with my mouth open, in awe of it's audaciousness. I the got into an argument with my friend over his buying the Telegraph and I think it was the last time I saw him.
    I've since read of countless examples of where the Telegraph has deliberately lied, smeared people, and twisted the truth to sell it's Tory agenda.

    tea with pinochet? that sounds simply splendid darlings. and so very very civilised. :rolleyes: :D
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Yeah, true. I did like reading the Guardian for a while but it became a bit skewered and boring. I liked George Monbiot's column in the Guardian. The Independent has bigger balls though.

    jeez steve. fisk... monbiot... dissing tea parties with pinochet. be careful or someone may start to think you're a little left of centre. or even worse...one of those god damn socialists. ;):)
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    catefrances wrote:
    jeez steve. fisk... monbiot... dissing tea parties with pinochet. be careful or someone may start to think you're a little left of centre. or even worse...one of those god damn socialists. ;):)

    Who? Me? :confused:
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Who? Me? :confused:

    the thought never crossed my mind for a second. ;)
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say

Categories