What's up with Fox news?

13567

Comments

  • El_Kabong
    El_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    jlew24asu wrote:
    ok so now you hate them all I got it.

    how does that equate to hate? you see things as too black and white

    are you saying you don't have a problem w/ fox pushing the 'more foreign leaders' comment even after ti was proven he never said that? why do you support those types of things?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • Purple Hawk
    Purple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    El_Kabong wrote:
    they should remove the 'news', too. do they even have any news shows? it seems like they're all op/ed shows to me. they used to have hte word NEWS on the screen either from the set or a graphic on Hannity & Colmes up to 6 times at once

    I could say the same thing about the NY Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, and the Washington post. BTW - how many employees have been forced into retirement b/c of false reporting?

    Fox news is equal time for us heyseed rednecks :)
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • brain of c
    brain of c Posts: 5,213
    fox news is an oxymoron.
    d'oh!!!!!!

    http://www.myspace.com/brain_of_c
  • Purple Hawk
    Purple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    brain of c wrote:
    fox news is an oxymoron.

    *applause* absolute brilliance. i'm not kidding...serioulsy, that's insightful commentary, thank you for your contribution.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • El_Kabong
    El_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    Purple Hawk wrote:
    I could say the same thing about the NY Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, and the Washington post. BTW - how many employees have been forced into retirement b/c of false reporting?

    i don't know,how many? i can think of 3 offhand

    stephen glass from the new republic, jason blair from the nytimes and that gannon prostitute guy
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    El_Kabong wrote:
    how does that equate to hate? you see things as too black and white

    are you saying you don't have a problem w/ fox pushing the 'more foreign leaders' comment even after ti was proven he never said that? why do you support those types of things?


    so I should automatically discount anything fox news has ever said because you just told me some story about some guy who lied about a comment?

    the point is, people here, mostly lead by you, will scream and yell about big bad fox news. anyone who watches fox MUST be a bush pnac loving far right neo con who is sadly brainwashed.

    you said it yourself..... you said I dont understand that fox "spreads lies". really? prove your statement besides the one example of some guy I never heard of. does fox do it daily? weekly? monthly? or the occasional misleading story that every other outlet does.

    fox news is no different then any other news outlet. they all have an agenda. sometimes stories are misleading. most of the time they are not. they simply report the particular story and lets the audience decide.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    chiefojibwa wrote:
    i think it's hilarious that those tools at faux news call suicide bombers "homicide bombers"

    yeah, no agenda. give me a fucking break.


    so they arent homicide bombers?

    whats their agenda by saying this?

    who said they, like the rest of them, do not have an agenda?
  • kenny olav
    kenny olav Posts: 3,319
    this still cracks me up:

    http://web1.hannity.com/hannidate

    Hannidate!! HAHAHAHAHA... where you can find like-minded singles, i.e. those who are also "hannitized"

    not that there's anyone sane, or with a soul for that matter, who works for Fox News, but I think all you need to know about them is that they have Sean Hannity as an employee.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    great dodge
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    chiefojibwa wrote:
    actually i'm a subaru man, burro.


    you also have the mind set of a 13 year old. and i'm being generous.

    what is fox's agenda by calling suicide bombers for what they really are? homicide bombers.

    I really want you to tell me. help me see the light.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    chiefojibwa wrote:
    actually i'm a subaru man, burro.

    what is fox's agenda for calling suicide bombers, homicide bombers?

    are they not homicide bombers?
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,294
    metsfan531941 wrote:
    lmfao

    If you thought that guy's joke was funny, I got a killer knock-knock joke for you, or maybe one of my "why'd the chicken cross the road" jokes.
  • El_Kabong
    El_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    jlew24asu wrote:
    so I should automatically discount anything fox news has ever said because you just told me some story about some guy who lied about a comment?

    the point is, people here, mostly lead by you, will scream and yell about big bad fox news. anyone who watches fox MUST be a bush pnac loving far right neo con who is sadly brainwashed.

    you said it yourself..... you said I dont understand that fox "spreads lies". really? prove your statement besides the one example of some guy I never heard of. does fox do it daily? weekly? monthly? or the occasional misleading story that every other outlet does.

    fox news is no different then any other news outlet. they all have an agenda. sometimes stories are misleading. most of the time they are not. they simply report the particular story and lets the audience decide.


    it wasn't 1 person saying it...there are 3 hosts of the show <different ones on the weekend> and they all pushed this lie every single day...but i guess pushing this lie about a presidential cadidate every day isn;t that bad, eh? there is plenty of evidence of faux spreading lies and misinformation

    how about that fake memo the administration used 'proving' atta was in iraq before 9/11? they pushed that repeatedly? or on 11/15 when Fox presesnted the contents of a weekly standard article, 'case closed' about a al qaeda/iraq ink, as fact all day long?

    what about when fox fired 3 reporters for the report on rgbh when they refused to edit their report and lie?

    From the February 12 edition of Special Report with Brit Hume: <note, the day before this show was filmed gen pace had already publicly said there is NO evidence linking Iran to the weapons in Iraq...and yet, here's what faux says that same day!

    BAIER: In an interview with CSPAN, a day after senior military officials in Baghdad laid out what they called firm evidence of Iran shipping explosives into Iraq, President Bush shrugged off suggestions that the presentation is a prelude to war.

    and there was NO mention of Gen Pace at all in this 'special report' ??

    what's funny is you go on and on about cnn, msnbc...telling lies...yet you can't seem to admit fox lies? you are so onesided
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    El_Kabong wrote:

    what's funny is you go on and on about cnn, msnbc...telling lies...yet you can't seem to admit fox lies? you are so onesided


    then you havent been reading what I said. fox, along with all others, will lie and mislead to push there agenda. i'm sure if we both use google as well as you we could find examples everywhere.

    how about disgraced dan rather? see I have examples too.

    no one here, included you, will ever come out and bash another news outlet. its only fox fox fox. its me who is trying to even the playing field.
  • El_Kabong
    El_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    jlew24asu wrote:
    then you havent been reading what I said. fox, along with all others, will lie and mislead to push there agenda. i'm sure if we both use google as well as you we could find examples everywhere.

    how about disgraced dan rather? see I have examples too.

    no one here, included you, will ever come out and bash another news outlet. its only fox fox fox. its me who is trying to even the playing field.


    really? i thought the other night i did exactly that??? maybe you haven't been reading?

    and if you say every news outlet does, how come when i said that you simply said 'oh, i see, you hate everybody'?? and if you think they all do it then why do you keep arguing fox DIDN'T do it!?!?

    do you just like to argue?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    El_Kabong wrote:
    really? i thought the other night i did exactly that??? maybe you haven't been reading?

    and if you say every news outlet does, how come when i said that you simply said 'oh, i see, you hate everybody'?? and if you think they all do it then why do you keep arguing fox DIDN'T do it!?!?

    do you just like to argue?

    I originally responded to your claim that I dont see that fox "spreads lies". i'm trying to say they are in the same boat as any other network. they all have an agenda and that is profits. ratings is the number 1 goal of ALL of them. expect maybe c-span which is why I enjoying watching it sometimes.

    but they all report major news stories and without all the big shot news anchors trying to make a name of him/herself, they do it with some level of accuracy.

    I'm still confused on why calling suicide bombers, homicide bombers is inaccurate? or only being said to push some agenda.
  • El_Kabong
    El_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I originally responded to your claim that I dont see that fox "spreads lies". i'm trying to say they are in the same boat as any other network. they all have an agenda and that is profits. ratings is the number 1 goal of ALL of them. expect maybe c-span which is why I enjoying watching it sometimes.

    but they all report major news stories and without all the big shot news anchors trying to make a name of him/herself, they do it with some level of accuracy.

    I'm still confused on why calling suicide bombers, homicide bombers is inaccurate? or only being said to push some agenda.

    ok, i see now...you hate everyone.

    i'm confused to why you said
    "no one here, included you, will ever come out and bash another news outlet"

    when i did that very thing the other night
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    El_Kabong wrote:
    ok, i see now...you hate them all.

    ;)


    I just hold them all about equal when it comes to bullshit.
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Ahnimus wrote:
    http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/


    thats cute.

    how can you be so against someone who is the leading voice for getting Jessica's Law passed in all 50 states?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica's_Law

Categories