Colbert polling higher than Ron Paul

godpt3
Posts: 1,020
Comedian Colbert Reaches Double Digits As Third-Party Candidate
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Comedian Stephen Colbert is not a threat to win the presidency, but the odds are that that his satire will win plenty of laughs and maybe even some votes.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that Colbert is preferred by 13% of voters as an independent candidate challenging Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Rudy Giuliani. The survey was conducted shortly after Colbert’s surprise announcement that he is lusting for the Oval Office.
The result is similar when Fred Thompson is the Republican in the three-way race. With Thompson as the GOP candidate, Colbert earns 12% of the vote.
Last week Colbert used his Comedy Central show "The Colbert Report" to announce that he is running for President as both a Republican and a Democrat, but only in the state of South Carolina. He first informed fellow jokester Jon Stewart on Stewart's program that so far he had only "decided to officially consider whether or not I will announce"—a habitual formulation of both politicians and comedians pretending to be politicians. Fifteen minutes later, however, Colbert was telling viewers of his own show: "After nearly 15 minutes of soul-searching, I have heard the call."
Colbert does particularly well with the younger voters most likely to be watching his show and therefore most aware of his myriad presidential-like qualities. In the match-up with Giuliani and Clinton, Colbert draws 28% of likely voters aged 18-29. He draws 31% of that cohort when his foes are Thompson and Clinton. In both match-ups, Colbert has more support with young voters than the GOP candidate.
"These are my people," Colbert didn't say when he wasn't asked about the high support from young voters discovered by Rasmussen Reports. "They know who I am and what I'm about, and so forth. Is this thing working, are we on the air? Oh, it's the Internet? Well why didn't you say the Internet?"
An earlier survey found that only 8% of Americans say they would definitely vote for comedian Jon Stewart if he was on the ballot in 2008. Just 38% say they would definitely vote against Stewart. It may be worth noting that the comedian outperformed Katie Couric on this point—62% of American voters would definitely vote against the CBS news anchor.
For what it’s worth, the overall numbers show Hillary Clinton at 45%, Rudy Giuliani at 35%, and Colbert at 13%.
The other match-up shows Clinton at 46%, Thompson at 34% and Colbert at 12%.
Rasmussen Reports releases a daily Presidential Tracking Poll along with weekly analysis on the races for the Democratic and Republican Presidential nominations. General election match-ups and other key stats are also available for all Republican and Democratic candidates.
Crosstabs available for Premium Members only.
Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
The Rasmussen Reports ElectionEdge™ Premium Service for Election 2008 offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a Presidential election.
Rasmussen Reports’ Election 2006 coverage has been praised for its accuracy and reliability. Michael Barone, Senior Writer for U.S. News & World Report and co-author of The Almanac of American Politics, mentions, “One clear lesson from the Republican victory of 2004 and the Democratic victory of 2006 is that the best place to look for polls that are spot on is RasmussenReports.com." And University of Virginia Professor Larry Sabato states, “In election campaigns, I’ve learned to look for the Rasmussen results. In my experience, they are right on the money. There is no question Rasmussen produces some of the most accurate and reliable polls in the country today.”
Rasmussen Reports was also the nation's most accurate polling firm during the 2004 Presidential election and the only one to project both Bush and Kerry's vote total within half a percentage point of the actual outcome.
During both Election 2004 and Election 2006, RasmussenReports.com was the top-ranked public opinion research site on the web. We had twice as many visitors as our nearest competitor and nearly as many as all competitors combined.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Comedian Stephen Colbert is not a threat to win the presidency, but the odds are that that his satire will win plenty of laughs and maybe even some votes.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that Colbert is preferred by 13% of voters as an independent candidate challenging Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Rudy Giuliani. The survey was conducted shortly after Colbert’s surprise announcement that he is lusting for the Oval Office.
The result is similar when Fred Thompson is the Republican in the three-way race. With Thompson as the GOP candidate, Colbert earns 12% of the vote.
Last week Colbert used his Comedy Central show "The Colbert Report" to announce that he is running for President as both a Republican and a Democrat, but only in the state of South Carolina. He first informed fellow jokester Jon Stewart on Stewart's program that so far he had only "decided to officially consider whether or not I will announce"—a habitual formulation of both politicians and comedians pretending to be politicians. Fifteen minutes later, however, Colbert was telling viewers of his own show: "After nearly 15 minutes of soul-searching, I have heard the call."
Colbert does particularly well with the younger voters most likely to be watching his show and therefore most aware of his myriad presidential-like qualities. In the match-up with Giuliani and Clinton, Colbert draws 28% of likely voters aged 18-29. He draws 31% of that cohort when his foes are Thompson and Clinton. In both match-ups, Colbert has more support with young voters than the GOP candidate.
"These are my people," Colbert didn't say when he wasn't asked about the high support from young voters discovered by Rasmussen Reports. "They know who I am and what I'm about, and so forth. Is this thing working, are we on the air? Oh, it's the Internet? Well why didn't you say the Internet?"
An earlier survey found that only 8% of Americans say they would definitely vote for comedian Jon Stewart if he was on the ballot in 2008. Just 38% say they would definitely vote against Stewart. It may be worth noting that the comedian outperformed Katie Couric on this point—62% of American voters would definitely vote against the CBS news anchor.
For what it’s worth, the overall numbers show Hillary Clinton at 45%, Rudy Giuliani at 35%, and Colbert at 13%.
The other match-up shows Clinton at 46%, Thompson at 34% and Colbert at 12%.
Rasmussen Reports releases a daily Presidential Tracking Poll along with weekly analysis on the races for the Democratic and Republican Presidential nominations. General election match-ups and other key stats are also available for all Republican and Democratic candidates.
Crosstabs available for Premium Members only.
Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
The Rasmussen Reports ElectionEdge™ Premium Service for Election 2008 offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a Presidential election.
Rasmussen Reports’ Election 2006 coverage has been praised for its accuracy and reliability. Michael Barone, Senior Writer for U.S. News & World Report and co-author of The Almanac of American Politics, mentions, “One clear lesson from the Republican victory of 2004 and the Democratic victory of 2006 is that the best place to look for polls that are spot on is RasmussenReports.com." And University of Virginia Professor Larry Sabato states, “In election campaigns, I’ve learned to look for the Rasmussen results. In my experience, they are right on the money. There is no question Rasmussen produces some of the most accurate and reliable polls in the country today.”
Rasmussen Reports was also the nation's most accurate polling firm during the 2004 Presidential election and the only one to project both Bush and Kerry's vote total within half a percentage point of the actual outcome.
During both Election 2004 and Election 2006, RasmussenReports.com was the top-ranked public opinion research site on the web. We had twice as many visitors as our nearest competitor and nearly as many as all competitors combined.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.
"If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
—Dorothy Parker
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
—Dorothy Parker
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
The sad and depressing thing about this article is that most 18-20 year olds probably DO believe that this clown is a legitimate candidate....0
-
Delaware Vol wrote:The sad and depressing thing about this article is that most 18-20 year olds probably DO believe that this clown is a legitimate candidate....
Ask Condoleeza Rice. She's been fascisMonized.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
Yeah, anyone who would really vote for him is an idiot in my book. I really think Rudy and Hillary are under qualified for the job, let alone someone with no policy experience whatsoever.0
-
i think its fine. Most of the people that vote for him probably wouldnt vote at all. Voting for him is a vote for "none of the above". Throwing a little chaos into the mix can be healthy i think. Plus he could probably do a better job than most of the others, sadly.
Kind of a weird social experiment to see how close we are to electing celebrities.0 -
MrSmith wrote:i think its fine. Most of the people that vote for him probably wouldnt vote at all. Voting for him is a vote for "none of the above". Throwing a little chaos into the mix can be healthy i think. Plus he could probably do a better job than most of the others, sadly.
Kind of a weird social experiment to see how close we are to electing celebrities.
200,000 votes for comedian Pat Paulsen in '68.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
gue_barium wrote:It pays to be cynical.
Ask Condoleeza Rice. She's been fascisMonized.
She's been what?one foot in the door
the other foot in the gutter
sweet smell that they adore
I think I'd rather smother
-The Replacements-0 -
fragileblake wrote:Yeah, anyone who would really vote for him is an idiot in my book. I really think Rudy and Hillary are under qualified for the job, let alone someone with no policy experience whatsoever.
I generally think that anyone who would really vote for the majority of the current candidates is an idiot. Sorry, but it's slim pickings.0 -
I love how so many of the hip youngens love Ron Paul cause he's anti war... or whatever... but you'd love to know that he support the legalization of assault weapons (which are made only for killing other people) and the production of congressional mail which referred to black people as "fleet footed". And there is lot more where that came from.Writing checks that others pay.....0
-
Being a Ron Paul supporter is kind of like preaching from the Bible. If you pick and choose what you like it sounds like the most wonderful collection of beliefs and morality. You've just got to overlook about half of it.0
-
that is absolutely hilarious! thanks for posting that godpt3. i needed a good laugh this morning.
colbert....great president?...or greatest president?
eventually he's going to hold some kind of guinness record for these gags and all the things he's had named after him. some of the stuff that he and his staff come up with is pure comedic genius.0 -
bruce wrote:I love how so many of the hip youngens love Ron Paul cause he's anti war... or whatever... but you'd love to know that he support the legalization of assault weapons (which are made only for killing other people) and the production of congressional mail which referred to black people as "fleet footed". And there is lot more where that came from.
Black people are fleet footed...just watch the NFL.one foot in the door
the other foot in the gutter
sweet smell that they adore
I think I'd rather smother
-The Replacements-0 -
bruce wrote:I love how so many of the hip youngens love Ron Paul cause he's anti war... or whatever... but you'd love to know that he support the legalization of assault weapons (which are made only for killing other people) and the production of congressional mail which referred to black people as "fleet footed". And there is lot more where that came from.
no no. I think most people, including myself, like ron paul not because of his war stance, but of his stance of less government and liberty principles.0 -
gabers wrote:Being a Ron Paul supporter is kind of like preaching from the Bible. If you pick and choose what you like it sounds like the most wonderful collection of beliefs and morality. You've just got to overlook about half of it.
doesnt that hold true for about every candidate? unless you blindly support one party no matter what the stance.0 -
bruce wrote:I love how so many of the hip youngens love Ron Paul cause he's anti war... or whatever... but you'd love to know that he support the legalization of assault weapons (which are made only for killing other people) and the production of congressional mail which referred to black people as "fleet footed". And there is lot more where that came from.
guns are supported by constitution...pretty simple for him.
He actually didn't say those things about blacks. A staffer wrote those things in his newsletter and heres a little more to that story
Michael Krekel, a spokesperson for Congressman Paul’s campaign, has now responded to the allegations of racism in the Congressman’s writings. Krekel called the writings “unfortunate,” but said that the writings referenced above were “not written by the congressman personally.”
“It was composed by a ghostwriter, and then sent out with Dr. Paul’s name attached to it, Krekel told The Daily Background. He also said that at the time, Paul was not directly involved in politics and that he had a staffer write the column in his place. Paul “has apologized repeatedly for his error, and he has been dealing with the incident for 15 years,” Krekel added.
“While the views expressed on African Americans do not reflect Congressman Paul’s views, he understands that he is responsible for anything that goes out in his weekly column.”make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need0 -
bruce wrote:I love how so many of the hip youngens love Ron Paul cause he's anti war... or whatever... but you'd love to know that he support the legalization of assault weapons (which are made only for killing other people) and the production of congressional mail which referred to black people as "fleet footed". And there is lot more where that came from.
being against the so called assault weapons ban dosen make you pro little jimmy owning a gulf 240.
the majority of people in favor of that wouldn't know which way to hold a weapon much less know what an assault weapon is not to mention there are thousands of people who do own fully automatic assault weapons with permits that never kill anyone. The logic behind making guns illegal is the same logic behind making drugs illegal. You aren't getting rid of either, and people are going to make bad choices, Prohibition is the worst way to try and end a behavior.
Paul might be too much of an isolationist for some people but a politician in favor of liberty and an actual proponent of the free market economy I can get behind. I doubt I'll vote for him though but we'll see.
No canidate ever is going to be perfect. I'm impressed a few young people are even paying attention for whatever reason.My Girlfriend said to me..."How many guitars do you need?" and I replied...."How many pairs of shoes do you need?" She got really quiet.0 -
MrSmith wrote:Kind of a weird social experiment to see how close we are to electing celebrities.
Not that unusual, really. "celebs" get elected to offices all the time. John Glenn, Tom Osborne, Sonny Bono, Ahnold, etc... It's because they have high name recognition."If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
—Dorothy Parker
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg0 -
jlew24asu wrote:doesnt that hold true for about every candidate? unless you blindly support one party no matter what the stance.
True, every candidate has their flaws, but it seems like the more you dig into his beliefs the more scary he sounds. At least to me. I still like him better than the rest of the Republican candidates, but that doesn't mean I'd want him as president. I appreciate how he's making the other candidates talk about big issues like the war in Iraq though, and our overall involvement in foreign affairs.0 -
Well... for those of us 'idiots' out here who are tired of given only the choice between a shit and jelly sandwich or a turd omlette... we think we might actually choose mockery cake this time. And what really seperates this 'clown' from the rest of the clowns in the field... they are politicians? That make them the better choice? If you believe the campaign lies of politicians... you are the clown, not them. The only one telling us the truth... that the whole campaign process is a fucking joke... Stephen Colbert.
So, bon appitite, assholes. Let me know is adding tobasco sauce to your turd omlette makes it go down any easier... I'm going to be having some delicious protest cake with thick layer of 'Sick of the mockery that American Politics have become' icing. Mmmmmmm... mockery.Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!0 -
gabers wrote:True, every candidate has their flaws, but it seems like the more you dig into his beliefs the more scary he sounds. At least to me. I still like him better than the rest of the Republican candidates, but that doesn't mean I'd want him as president. I appreciate how he's making the other candidates talk about big issues like the war in Iraq though, and our overall involvement in foreign affairs.
You talk as if there are piles and piles of things to dislike about Ron Paul, but you articulate none of them.
P.S. Most of the "polls" you read about do not even mention Ron Paul when they ask about the nominees. Also, Ron Paul is not mentioned ONCE in this article....I am now wondering why the OP posted about this at all.
Also, Colbert might not even go the full distance and throw this support behind another candidate...and we all know who that will be on the Republican side.No need to be void, or save up on life
You got to spend it all0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help