Canadian vs. Quebec Nations...

thankyougrandma
Posts: 1,182
The thing hit me last week when a canadian told on this very same moving train, that he was unaware of a thing called the Quebec nation, and the debate has taken place this week-end because of Harper bullshit appearance at the Citadel to say that Quebec wasn't a nation (yeah, during the national holiday, asshole), after the recent event in the Catalan region that saw the Catalans being recognized as a nation even if they're part of Spain, the Scottish are recognized as a nation even if their part of the UK, now i wonder:
Why does the Canadian Prime Minister, or the Canadian population in general, refuse to accept or recognize, the fact that Quebec IS a nation?
The national assembly of Quebec, Jean Charest ahead (far from being a separatist) recognize this fact, we are a nation that is not recognize by the canadian government, what are they afraid of exactly? If this country want to be called a multicultural nation, better waken up to the culture that are actually... canadian...
Why does the Canadian Prime Minister, or the Canadian population in general, refuse to accept or recognize, the fact that Quebec IS a nation?
The national assembly of Quebec, Jean Charest ahead (far from being a separatist) recognize this fact, we are a nation that is not recognize by the canadian government, what are they afraid of exactly? If this country want to be called a multicultural nation, better waken up to the culture that are actually... canadian...
"L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
PM accused of insulting Quebec
Refusal to call province a nation draws ire of Bloc, PQ, but PMO stands by comments
STEVEN CHASE AND ANDRÉ PICARD
OTTAWA and MONTREAL -- Prime Minister Stephen Harper's refusal to call Quebec a nation has given political rivals a weapon they've been seeking to chip away at Conservative fortunes in the hotly contested province.
Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe accused Mr. Harper of insulting Quebeckers. "If I went to Ottawa next Friday, on the eve of July 1, and I refused to recognize the existence of the Canadian nation, that would be an enormous scandal, and rightfully so," he said.
Mr. Harper was drawn into the debate about Quebec's nationhood during a Quebec City trip on the eve of the province's politically charged St. Jean Baptiste Day holiday.
He was asked by local reporters whether he considered Quebec a nation -- a question the Parti Québécois and Bloc Québécois had challenged him to answer.
Mr. Harper dodged the query, saying he respects the Quebec legislature's declaration that Quebec is a nation, but felt Ottawa has no need to enter the debate. "I don't know, quite frankly, what its legal significance is," he said, adding later that "it just seems to me to be a semantic debate that doesn't serve any purpose."
The comments were pounced upon by the Bloc, which has been looking for a wedge issue that hurts the Tories ever since the separatist party lost ground to the Conservatives in the Jan. 23 election.
The Tories are hunting more seats in Quebec by promising to rectify the so-called fiscal imbalance of wealth between Ottawa and the provinces, cleaning up federal politics and giving Quebec City a bigger voice on the international stage.
The Bloc's provincial allies, the Parti Québécois, said Mr. Harper's comments show he's ignorant of Quebec culture and history. "I'm disappointed to see that Mr. Harper is incapable of looking Quebeckers in the eyes and recognizing who they really are," PQ Leader André Boisclair said this weekend.
While he wasn't criticizing Mr. Harper, Quebec Premier Jean Charest, a federalist, left no doubt about where he stood.
"As Premier of Quebec I want to say loud and clear that we form a nation," he said at Montreal City Hall on Saturday. "The fact that we are a people and a nation doesn't contradict in any way the fact that we are also Canadian citizens."
The Prime Minister's Office said Mr. Harper's comments stand. "I can tell you that Quebeckers know who they are, they don't need us to tell them," said Sandra Buckler, spokeswoman for Mr. Harper. "What they want is to be respected, and that is exactly what our Conservative government is doing. Mr. Boisclair is panicking because Quebeckers don't want another referendum due to our approach of a federalism of openness."
New Democratic Party Leader Jack Layton, in Quebec for St. Jean Baptiste Day on Saturday, said he's disappointed that Mr. Harper can't call Quebeckers a nation, in part because he thinks it would help assuage separatist feelings. "It's not a hard or challenging observation to make and it corresponds to historical realities."
Political analysts said Mr. Harper has little to gain by publicly declaring that Quebec is a nation because it risks angering his base in Western Canada, or even rock-ribbed federalists inside Quebec.
"Engaging a national debate on Quebec's role in Canada is a no-win for Stephen Harper outside of the province of Quebec," said Allan Gregg, pollster and chair of the Strategic Counsel.
Mr. Harper should have expected the question would arise when he staged a cabinet retreat in Quebec's capital city the day before the province's national holiday, said Peter Donolo, the Strategic Counsel's executive vice-president.
"He was clearly trying [to] exploit symbolism, so he shouldn't be too surprised when the symbolism comes around and smacks him in the head," Mr. Donolo said.
The Tories boosted their Quebec electoral support to 25 per cent in the 2006 election, from 9 per cent in 2004. An early June Strategic Counsel poll indicated Conservative support had held steady since Jan. 23."L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
well ... what do the people who actually put harper in power think? ... those quebec seats made all the difference ...0
-
Will there be a new mailing address instead of POC? Just curious.
Not to take the steam out of your sails there grandma, but didn't Harper cut another stupid comment about the parade here this weekend. The man just can't say the right things when the mic or camera is on.You've changed your place in this world!0 -
polaris wrote:well ... what do the people who actually put harper in power think? ... those quebec seats made all the difference ...
it's disguting, no Quebec flags were flying during the Harper visits in Beauce, why can't he come celebrate in Montreal? Anyway he was bash in every Fête Nationale concert i've seen (2) and on tv, newspapers, this was seen as a provocation, going into retreat in the citadel wall to say that Quebec isn't a nation, are we back to this kind of bullshit?
"L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
even flow? wrote:Will there be a new mailing address instead of POC? Just curious.
Not to take the steam out of your sails there grandma, but didn't Harper cut another stupid comment about the parade here this weekend. The man just can't say the right things when the mic or camera is on.
I don't know, haven't heard that one, i'm so pissed at this PM, at least Chrétien would have babble something funny about it, and he wouldn't have retreat himself in the citadel on 24th of june to say such an idiocy..."L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
Oh Polaris, Layton was walking in the streets almost hand in hand with Gilles Duceppe in Montreal
, saw them it was such a nice scene, almost cried , but since i was over the .08 limit i choose not to talk to them... I also like how Layton is talking about it...
"L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
Lack of flags at Harper Quebec speech
Kevin Dougherty, CanWest News Service; Montreal Gazette
Published: Sunday, June 25, 2006
ST. JOSEPH DE BEAUCE, Que. -- Prime Minister Stephen Harper ended a two-day visit to the Quebec City region Saturday with a speech that was interrupted by the noon peal of church bells.
"Even God is happy I am here today," he joked.
"This is not a day for big speeches," Harper told a crowd of about 200 at the municipal park of this Beauce town south of Quebec City, after praising Maxime Bernier, his industry minister and the local Tory MP.
The prime minister also paid tribute to the hard work and attachment to "family values" of the Beaucerons.
Harper then shook hands and posed for pictures with ordinary Quebecers. But no flags were flying, even though it was Quebec's special day.
"Honestly, we didn't think about it," St. Joseph Mayor Michel Cliche confided.
But the mayor did note Harper was the first non-French Canadian prime minister ever to visit his town of about 5,000.
On Friday, Harper and his cabinet met behind the thick stone walls of the Citadel, the 19th century fortress overlooking the old part of Quebec City.
He noted that 2008 is the city's 400th anniversary, calling it "the original capital of Canada."
One exception to the lack of flags Saturday was a half Canadian, half American flag on a sign carried by Lucille Gilbert.
Harper and Bernier agreed to autograph the sign. In return, Gilbert gave the prime minister a bottle of champagne and a card.
The Conservatives won eight of their 10 Quebec seats in this region and Harper is said to be counting on at least doubling that score in the next election, so he can form a majority government.
"Bienvenue dans la nation de la Beauce," ("Welcome to the nation of the Beauce,") said Yvon Poulin, as he shook hands with Harper.
"You will win 42 (Quebec) seats next time," Poulin told the prime minister.
""I hope so," Harper replied.
Poulin told a reporter the Tories already have 10 1/2 Quebec seats, counting Andre Arthur, the controversial radio commentator who won Portneuf riding as an independent but votes with the Conservatives.
Jean-Claude Richard, a trucker and former president of the Conservative riding association in neighbouring Megantic-L'Erable riding, told Harper he was in Dallas on Wednesday and returned home to shake hands with the prime minister.
Harper ended his speech Saturday with the salutation, "Bonne Fete nationale!" a reference to Quebec's June 24th holiday.
He did not take reporters questions, but on Friday when asked if he recognized Quebec as "a nation," a word whose meaning in French is closer to "a people" than to "a country," he said he didn't want to get into a "semantic debate that doesn't serve any purpose."
Harper said he recognized that the Quebec National Assembly, as the province's legislature is known, unanimously approved a resolution affirming that Quebec is a nation.
"I don't know quite frankly what its legal significance is," he said. "But it is important for the prime minister of Canada to defend the unity of Canada."
Harper also said he disagrees with the Charest government's plan for a carbon tax, which the oil companies say would add 1.5 cent a litre to the pump price of gasoline in Quebec.
"We believe that a carbon tax won't be effective at all," he said, adding that a carbon tax would raise gas prices for consumers.
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=b181e601-96f4-47b7-a0bd-925a925e231b&k=65437"L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
thankyougrandma wrote:One exception to the lack of flags Saturday was a half Canadian, half American flag on a sign carried by Lucille Gilbert.
Harper and Bernier agreed to autograph the sign. In return, Gilbert gave the prime minister a bottle of champagne and a card.
Sorry to quote myself but... hilarious..."L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
So, how would Canada react if the Prime Minister would make an official announcement just saying " The government of Canada, officialy recognize the Quebec nation..."? Would there be riots in the streets of Vancouver and Toronto? Or would it just be business as usual? I suspect it would make no difference at all and would give the PM a huge popularity boost in Quebec, so where's the damn problem, it's 2006 damn it..."L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
thankyougrandma wrote:So, how would Canada react if the Prime Minister would make an official announcement just saying " The government of Canada, officialy recognize the Quebec nation..."? Would there be riots in the streets of Vancouver and Toronto? Or would it just be business as usual? I suspect it would make no difference at all and would give the PM a huge popularity boost in Quebec, so where's the damn problem, it's 2006 damn it...
of course there would be riots in toronto, but that would be because of the world cup not because of quebec. i personally think that Toronto and Quebec are very similar.0 -
fife wrote:of course there would be riots in toronto, but that would be because of the world cup not because of quebec. i personally think that Toronto and Quebec are very similar.
just try to get serve in french in a Toronto restaurant, good luck, it's easier to get french service in Florida than in Toronto..."L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
Quebec is a province in Canada. Internally it refers to itself as a nation but it is not. If Quebec wants to be a nation it should seperate, or lobby to have all provinces be named nations. And maybe Montreal can be a distinct nation within the nation of Quebec. As Montreal has just as distinct a culture and history within Quebec as Quebec has within Canada.
It's just time for Quebec to go it's own way. They will never be happy being a part of Canada.“One good thing about music,
when it hits you, you feel to pain.
So brutalize me with music.”
~ Bob Marley0 -
surferdude wrote:Quebec is a province in Canada. Internally it refers to itself as a nation but it is not. If Quebec wants to be a nation it should seperate, or lobby to have all provinces be named nations. And maybe Montreal can be a distinct nation within the nation of Quebec. As Montreal has just as distinct a culture and history within Quebec as Quebec has within Canada.
It's just time for Quebec to go it's own way. They will never be happy being a part of Canada.
wow, thanks for that, Quebec is a nation, however you spin it or refuse to say so, and i don't really understand the point of not recognizing it since it's an historical fact, it's not just an opinion, it's a fact, maybe we should go directly to the UN to get this fact recognize, that's what the first nation did to get around the Canadian stubborn feeling..."L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
thankyougrandma wrote:wow, thanks for that, Quebec is a nation, however you spin it or refuse to say so, and i don't really understand the point of not recognizing it since it's an historical fact, it's not just an opinion, it's a fact, maybe we should go directly to the UN to get this fact recognize, that's what the first nation did to get around the Canadian stubborn feeling...“One good thing about music,
when it hits you, you feel to pain.
So brutalize me with music.”
~ Bob Marley0 -
thankyougrandma wrote:Oh Polaris, Layton was walking in the streets almost hand in hand with Gilles Duceppe in Montreal
, saw them it was such a nice scene, almost cried , but since i was over the .08 limit i choose not to talk to them... I also like how Layton is talking about it...
in all honesty ... i don't really care whether quebec calls itself a nation - its like gay marriage, it's not that big a deal i think ...
i'm more concerned with whether or not the people who voted for harper will still vote for him ...0 -
surferdude wrote:I'm okay with that, just take Montreal with you so they can apply for the same recognition.
Sure, so let's go back on with the real discussion...
So, what Canadian would do if let's say, Layton or the next Liberal party chief would become the PM and say: I recognize the Quebec nation blablabla" would you be rioting in the streets with your fellow canadians?
If there's one culture that is strong in Canada, it's definitly not the canadian one, so why can't Canada embrace what is coming out of Quebec? As a Canadian culture thing? If it ever happen, i might consider that we're part of the same nation, until then, there's a huge gap that is to be filled between both NATIONS. It's also about language, policies, politics, etc. Of course we share some of the same values, we're not ennemies, we're just different nations.
If you look down into your history book, this country was occupied by the first nations (who are ,and i was wrong, recognized as nations from Canada, just like Acadians), then the french, then the english, it's not hard to see where the nations are being divide, it would be possible to stay in Canada and be respected and recognize as a building or founding nation, it's all in the facts, again it's not an opinion, it's an historical fact and has nothing to do with the separation of Quebec, just like the Catalans, would you say that Spain made a mistake by recognizing the Catalans nations? You said it yourself, Quebec call themselves a nation, and that's the only requirement to be considered a nation, under a UN treaty about self determination, sign by Canada. The only thing that is left to do, is having the canadian govt. making it official, and soon write it in a constitution, that would be sign by Quebec, finally. Such a non sense to have a province who disagree with the constitution being force to deal with it anyway (that's probably a different topic)
About Montreal, i don't know why you keep bringing that stupid thing about Montreal separating from Quebec, it's not even an argument, i'm talking about the national identity, in Montreal there's probably 90 differents nations represented, so i don't get your point, other than trying to piss me off maybe..."L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
polaris wrote:in all honesty ... i don't really care whether quebec calls itself a nation - its like gay marriage, it's not that big a deal i think ...
i'm more concerned with whether or not the people who voted for harper will still vote for him ...
so to interpret your word, you're happy that Harper didn't recognize Quebec as a nation just to watch Harper's vote flying away.
In Quebec it will depend on who's the next Liberal chief, i guess, and how Layton manage to stay a figure in the medias and in the population..."L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau0 -
thankyougrandma wrote:About Montreal, i don't know why you keep bringing that stupid thing about Montreal separating from Quebec, it's not even an argument, i'm talking about the national identity, in Montreal there's probably 90 differents nations represented, so i don't get your point, other than trying to piss me off maybe...
I would only hope that any "nation" would respect the will of it's people to seek their own "nationhood". From my experience Montreal does not want to or historically belong to the Quebec "nation" but belongs to the "nation" of Canada.“One good thing about music,
when it hits you, you feel to pain.
So brutalize me with music.”
~ Bob Marley0 -
I beleive (or hope) Canadadians would be more than willing to embrace Quebec as a nation. I mean hell, why not? It would create a harmony not previously experienced in our great country, IMO. And as for Mr. Harper....is anyone really all that surprised that he's a complete ass?Want to be enlightened, like I want to be told the end.0
-
thankyougrandma wrote:so to interpret your word, you're happy that Harper didn't recognize Quebec as a nation just to watch Harper's vote flying away
.
In Quebec it will depend on who's the next Liberal chief, i guess, and how Layton manage to stay a figure in the medias and in the population...
sort of ...
but the guy from the rock said it quite nicely ... i believe in embracing our differences ...0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help