Foo's vs Nirvana

2

Comments

  • the wolf
    the wolf Posts: 7,027
    Wrong forum, but...

    If Kurt was still alive, I'm not so sure that the Foo's would even be in existence as a band.

    You never know how changing history would have affected the present....


    agreed about the Foo's being in exsistence.

    IMO, there is no way that Nirvana would not be then, and still now, the biggest band around. ( and i'm not a huge Nirvana fan, i like them a lot, i respect Kurt, but.... ) they would still be the shit, i think Kurt would have warmed up to his posistion in life, much like Eddie did, and i think the music that would have come from him/them, would have been great. i started likeing them more towards the end though, so i could be wrong.

    i didnt like their huge songs that everyone else liked, i like the more obscure shit. anyway. i think Nirvana would still be HUGE. and that means, no FOO, and even if Dave G. left the band , it wouldnt matter.
    Peace, Love.


    "To question your government is not unpatriotic --
    to not question your government is unpatriotic."
    -- Sen. Chuck Hagel
  • the wolf
    the wolf Posts: 7,027
    dave has done alright with his band.........too bad kurt didn't recognise his talents as a songwriter while he was in Nirvana. They could have written songs together, Cobain/Grohl. They could have been the grunge version of Lennon/McCartney.......


    i also agree with this.
    Peace, Love.


    "To question your government is not unpatriotic --
    to not question your government is unpatriotic."
    -- Sen. Chuck Hagel
  • the wolf
    the wolf Posts: 7,027


    what is "this" ( above) supposed to prove? they were a good noise band, that is not brutal it thats what you were going for.

    again, i think Nirvana would be HUGE, but, i dont get this.
    Peace, Love.


    "To question your government is not unpatriotic --
    to not question your government is unpatriotic."
    -- Sen. Chuck Hagel
  • Kilgore_Trout
    Kilgore_Trout Posts: 7,334
    without question nirvana would be bigger (in a hypothetical universe that allows both bands to coexist)

    i think dave would have eventual become more active within nirvana as a singer/songwriter and some foo material may still have surfaced in a different way... probably would end up being even better with kurts help...

    honestly tho, while i like the foos they can be a lil gimmicky at times and their songs are too straight forward in general...

    im not one to suck off kurt or anything and its unfortunate the catelogue of the band is overshadowed by his death... but they were an AMAZING band
    "Senza speme vivemo in disio"

    http://seanbriceart.com/
  • sponger
    sponger Posts: 3,159
    I remember being 16 and rocking nirvana tablature on an ibanez electric in my friend's garage while he banged away on his CB700 or something drumset.

    Any negative comments about Nirvana would've been fightin' words back then.
  • Them-Bones
    Them-Bones Posts: 518
    Anyone who shits on Cobain should really be thank full he made the music he did, because if it wasn't for Nirvana, most of us would've never heard of Pearl Jam
    "If my thoughts, dreams, could be seen, they'd probably put my head, in a guillotine, but it's alright ma, it's life and life only."
  • dirtyT
    dirtyT Posts: 3,620
    know1 wrote:
    I agree in that I think Dave wasn't going to be in Nirvana much longer. He was already working on the material that became the first Foo album. If he'd have stayed in Nirvana, it would have really held him back as a musician.
    agreed
    Cuyahoga Falls 98, Columbus 00, Cleveland 03, Columbus 03, Toledo 04, Grand Rapids 04, Kitchener 05, Cleveland 06, Cincinnati 06, Washington DC 08, Philadelphia IV 09, Columbus 10, Cleveland 10, Chicago 13, Pittsburgh 13, Cincinnati 14, Chicago (1) 16, Chicago (2) 16
  • dirtyT
    dirtyT Posts: 3,620
    Them-Bones wrote:
    Anyone who shits on Cobain should really be thank full he made the music he did, because if it wasn't for Nirvana, most of us would've never heard of Pearl Jam
    that was stated, he opened some doors for better bands/musicinas to come through.
    Cuyahoga Falls 98, Columbus 00, Cleveland 03, Columbus 03, Toledo 04, Grand Rapids 04, Kitchener 05, Cleveland 06, Cincinnati 06, Washington DC 08, Philadelphia IV 09, Columbus 10, Cleveland 10, Chicago 13, Pittsburgh 13, Cincinnati 14, Chicago (1) 16, Chicago (2) 16
  • DOSW
    DOSW Posts: 2,014
    Jeremy1012 wrote:
    This is an argument about the Foos and Nirvana, not the Foos and an edgy, raw, tortured, brutal, grungey awesome band ;)

    Seriously though. Nirvana never made anything that comes near to "brutal". Even the most harrowing of Kurt's songs had either a pop sensibility or was just insanely contrived and naive. His best songs were the ones that displayed his love for guitar pop music like the Vaselines. Nirvana's version of Son of a Gun is better than any crap like "Rape Me".

    Songs like Scentless Apprentice and Milk It sound pretty brutal to me...
    It's a town full of losers and I'm pulling out of here to win
  • reeferchief
    reeferchief Posts: 3,569
    DOSW wrote:
    Songs like Scentless Apprentice and Milk It sound pretty brutal to me...

    In Utero was an excellent album, infact I may stick it on now.:)
    Can not be arsed with life no more.
  • Jeremy1012
    Jeremy1012 Posts: 7,170
    You sound like a hipster. Just because Nirvana was popular does not mean that they werent edgy and brutal. Just because somebody was edgy and brutal before Nirvana doesnt take away from them being the same. I know that Nirvanas best songs were their rock songs that were full of hooks but I think basically everything they made was great.
    I'm not intending to sound like a hipster, I just don't see anything brutal in Endless Nameless. If you ask me, Nirvana's most brutal moments (if indeed they had any) were songs like Polly. Musically they weren't "brutal" at all. Making dissonant guitar noise does not a brutal song make.
    DOSW wrote:
    Songs like Scentless Apprentice and Milk It sound pretty brutal to me...
    really? Agree to disagree then.
    "I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
  • DOSW
    DOSW Posts: 2,014
    Jeremy1012 wrote:
    really? Agree to disagree then.

    The soundwaves that come out of my speakers when those songs are playing peel the skin off my face like sandpaper.... so yeah, I'd say they're pretty brutal. :D

    But that's just me.
    It's a town full of losers and I'm pulling out of here to win
  • I wish the Foo's would've continued to go in this direction...

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=RG0qw4TFti4
  • LukinTimer
    LukinTimer Posts: 538
    Saturnal wrote:
    Cobain's influence when he was alive was much greater than Grohl's has ever been. Grohl is very talented (as much, maybe more than Cobain musically speaking), but it's extremely rare for that many people to connect so personally with an artist like they connected with Cobain. That's why Nirvana was so popular...their legacy has little to do with his premature death.

    I agree. Nirvana's legacy has little to do with Cobain's early death. After all these years, it can be difficult to remember the affect he had on music and the "youth of that time." (That phrase cracks me up. :D) It was profound. And it started LONG before he killed himself... it wasn't a result of his death. I think it's easy to forget that if you weren't around, or into music at that time.

    I do like the Foos, and seeing them live several times it's hard to imagine Dave staying put behind the drums.. I think his head would explode.
    "Holly f**k, that was so amazing, I just forgot who I came here to see!!" - Courtesy of the guy in the U2 t-shirt standing next to me in Aloha Stadium, Post PJ
  • HermanBloom
    HermanBloom Posts: 1,764
    DOSW wrote:
    Boring generic hard rock music with no personality vs edgy, raw, tortured, brutal grungey awesomeness.

    Tough call there.
    agreed
    Kurt was leaving Nirvana before he died anyways.

    Foo Fighters are corporate schlock
    SLC 11/2/95, Park City 6/21/98, Boise 11/3/00, Seattle 12/9/02, Vancouver 5/30/03, Gorge 9/1/05, Vancouver 9/2/05, Gorge 7/22/06, Gorge 7/23/06, Camden I 6/19/08, MSG I 6/24/08, MSG II 6/25/08, Hartford 6/27/08, Mansfield II 6/30/08; Eddie Albany 6/8/09, 6/9/09; Philly 10/30/09, 10/31/09; Boston 5/17/10
    I thought the world...Turns out the world thought me
  • Over where I am, their songs get thrashed on the radio! Though saying that, Nirvana is on atleast once a day.
    I just wondered if Nirvana was so famous because of the fact Kurt killed himself? If Dave Grohl killed himself, would Foo's popularity rise more than if he stayed alive? Is this a shallow way to be famous??? Does it mean more, or less?

    You may like Nirvana, you may not, but, they were one of the most influential bands in history. They changed rock. Yes, I know...the groundwork was already there from other bands, but Nevermind changed everything. I don't see how it can be denied that Nirvana opened doors for a heap of bands to follow.

    The same can be said for the Beatles.

    The same can be said for Hank Williams.



    Foo might be a better band, but they will never be as influential.
    The only thing I enjoy is having no feelings....being numb rocks!

    And I won't make the same mistakes
    (Because I know)
    Because I know how much time that wastes
    (And function)
    Function is the key
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    Foo might be a better band, but they will never be as influential.

    might being the operative word. :D
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • might being the operative word. :D


    indeed...I am a huge fan of Nirvana. I have friends who hate them, so I am like...okay...let me make you 1 CD and see what you think. I have never had a person not come back disappointed.

    I mean...seriously...start looking at some of the not mainstream(ish) stuff...

    I typically make people a CD with some of these:
    Do Rei Me
    The Man Who Sold The World
    You know your right
    Very Ape
    Spank Thru
    Been a Son
    Seasons In The Sun
    Scentless Apprentice

    Verse Chorus Verse (acoustic version)
    Return Of The Rat
    The only thing I enjoy is having no feelings....being numb rocks!

    And I won't make the same mistakes
    (Because I know)
    Because I know how much time that wastes
    (And function)
    Function is the key
  • Cropduster84
    Cropduster84 Posts: 1,283
    I don't think Nirvana and the Foos are anything alike.....


    I much prefer Nirvana.....


    Foos are too, i dunno, too something.....feels false.....
    'The more I studied religions the more I am convinced that man never worshipped anything but himself.' - Sir Richard Francis Burton
  • might being the operative word. :D


    indeed...I am a huge fan of Nirvana. I have friends who hate them, so I am like...okay...let me make you 1 CD and see what you think. I have never had a person not come back disappointed.

    I mean...seriously...start looking at some of the not mainstream(ish) stuff...

    I typically make people a CD with some of these:
    Do Rei Me
    The Man Who Sold The World
    You know your right
    Very Ape
    Floyd The Barber
    Dumb
    Lake of fire
    Spank Thru
    Lounge Act (my fav Nirvana song)
    I Hate Myself And I Want To Die
    Been a Son
    Seasons In The Sun
    Scentless Apprentice
    On A Plain
    Verse Chorus Verse (acoustic version)
    Return Of The Rat
    Where did you sleep last night
    Mexican Seafood (ya gatta add this just because)
    The only thing I enjoy is having no feelings....being numb rocks!

    And I won't make the same mistakes
    (Because I know)
    Because I know how much time that wastes
    (And function)
    Function is the key