MLB 2024 Off Season

1754755757759760788

Comments

  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,173
    kershaw says he wants to win “another” world series.

    that’s cute.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,173
    fuck the cocksuckers.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,840
    Fucking scumbag dodgers got him 
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 27,991
    Damn
    I miss igotid88
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 27,991
    12 years $27 million a year
    I miss igotid88
  • cutzcutz Posts: 11,834
    Fucking scumbag dodgers got him 
    ?Who???
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 27,991
    cutz said:
    Fucking scumbag dodgers got him 
    ?Who???
    Yamamoto 
    I miss igotid88
  • cutzcutz Posts: 11,834
    igotid88 said:
    cutz said:
    Fucking scumbag dodgers got him 
    ?Who???
    Yamamoto 
    Thank you.
  • PoncierPoncier Posts: 16,921
    When do they start paying him? In the year 2069?
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • 6969
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,173
    motherfucking cocksuckers.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • Wobbie said:
    motherfucking cocksuckers.
    Top of the morning to you!!
    Take me piece by piece.....
    Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 27,991
    edited December 2023
    I guess it was the Dodgers' to lose. If the Yankees had offered the same they'd most likely would have chosen the Dodgers. Also their system has been working. Maybe not so much in the playoffs but for the season they're going to get 95+ wins. Also the NL west hasn't been that competitive. They could have joined Arizona or San Diego to make it more interesting. 
    Post edited by igotid88 on
    I miss igotid88
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 27,991

    I miss igotid88
  • How the hell can you enforce that pitcher warm up rule? What if there’s a double play?
    Spectrum 10/27/09; New Orleans JazzFest 5/1/10; Made in America 9/2/12; WF Center 10/21/13; WF Center 10/22/13; Baltimore 10/27/13;
    WF Center 4/28/16; WF Center 4/29/16; Fenway Park 8/7/16; Fenway Park 9/2/18; Asbury Park 9/18/21; Camden 9/14/22;
    Las Vegas 5/16/24; Las Vegas 5/18/24; WF Center 9/7/24; WF Center 9/9/24; Baltimore Arena 9/12/24

    Tres Mtns - TLA 3/23/11; EV - Tower Theatre 6/25/11; Temple of the Dog - Tower Theatre 11/5/16
  • Thorns2010Thorns2010 Posts: 2,200
    From this article on it https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/39161682/mlb-competition-committee-tinkering-pitch-runners-lanes

    Barring an injury, a pitcher who begins to warm up at the start of an inning will now be required to face at least one batter. Previously, they could be replaced during or after warmups. The league said there were 24 instances last season where the pitcher that warmed up between innings was replaced before throwing a pitch -- adding approximately three minutes of dead time.

    Sounds like it is just worded poorly in that graphic, as I take that to mean a pitcher who goes to the mound to warm up, not someone in the bullpen.



  • MayDay10MayDay10 Posts: 11,727
    I honestly thought/figured that was the rule anyways
  • From this article on it https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/39161682/mlb-competition-committee-tinkering-pitch-runners-lanes

    Barring an injury, a pitcher who begins to warm up at the start of an inning will now be required to face at least one batter. Previously, they could be replaced during or after warmups. The league said there were 24 instances last season where the pitcher that warmed up between innings was replaced before throwing a pitch -- adding approximately three minutes of dead time.

    Sounds like it is just worded poorly in that graphic, as I take that to mean a pitcher who goes to the mound to warm up, not someone in the bullpen.



    Warming up on the actual pitcher's mound - got it. Yeah I hate when they do that crap.
    Spectrum 10/27/09; New Orleans JazzFest 5/1/10; Made in America 9/2/12; WF Center 10/21/13; WF Center 10/22/13; Baltimore 10/27/13;
    WF Center 4/28/16; WF Center 4/29/16; Fenway Park 8/7/16; Fenway Park 9/2/18; Asbury Park 9/18/21; Camden 9/14/22;
    Las Vegas 5/16/24; Las Vegas 5/18/24; WF Center 9/7/24; WF Center 9/9/24; Baltimore Arena 9/12/24

    Tres Mtns - TLA 3/23/11; EV - Tower Theatre 6/25/11; Temple of the Dog - Tower Theatre 11/5/16
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,173
    igotid88 said:
    I guess it was the Dodgers' to lose. If the Yankees had offered the same they'd most likely would have chosen the Dodgers. Also their system has been working. Maybe not so much in the playoffs but for the season they're going to get 95+ wins. Also the NL west hasn't been that competitive. They could have joined Arizona or San Diego to make it more interesting. 
    “Their system”? they don’t have a system. They have gobs of money. At least the Yankees teams most of us hated developed a few of their own stars.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • So they're changing a rule based on events that happen less than 1% of the time? Makes sense.
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 27,991
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    I guess it was the Dodgers' to lose. If the Yankees had offered the same they'd most likely would have chosen the Dodgers. Also their system has been working. Maybe not so much in the playoffs but for the season they're going to get 95+ wins. Also the NL west hasn't been that competitive. They could have joined Arizona or San Diego to make it more interesting. 
    “Their system”? they don’t have a system. They have gobs of money. At least the Yankees teams most of us hated developed a few of their own stars.
    Talking about their analytics team and Andrew Friedman. Made the Rays a better team and got the Dodgers to where they are now. 
    I miss igotid88
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,173
    igotid88 said:
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    I guess it was the Dodgers' to lose. If the Yankees had offered the same they'd most likely would have chosen the Dodgers. Also their system has been working. Maybe not so much in the playoffs but for the season they're going to get 95+ wins. Also the NL west hasn't been that competitive. They could have joined Arizona or San Diego to make it more interesting. 
    “Their system”? they don’t have a system. They have gobs of money. At least the Yankees teams most of us hated developed a few of their own stars.
    Talking about their analytics team and Andrew Friedman. Made the Rays a better team and got the Dodgers to where they are now. 
    it’s not analytics, it’s money.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 27,991
    edited December 2023
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    I guess it was the Dodgers' to lose. If the Yankees had offered the same they'd most likely would have chosen the Dodgers. Also their system has been working. Maybe not so much in the playoffs but for the season they're going to get 95+ wins. Also the NL west hasn't been that competitive. They could have joined Arizona or San Diego to make it more interesting. 
    “Their system”? they don’t have a system. They have gobs of money. At least the Yankees teams most of us hated developed a few of their own stars.
    Talking about their analytics team and Andrew Friedman. Made the Rays a better team and got the Dodgers to where they are now. 
    it’s not analytics, it’s money.
    Obviously money helps. But the Rays weren't spending. If Robert's were to leave or be fired and go to a different team that spends as much. He won't be averaging 100 wins 
    Post edited by igotid88 on
    I miss igotid88
  • Stupid fucking Mets pay more in salary tax than Reds paid in salary.  Both teams missed playoffs....but Reds were out with a few days left in the season and Mets were out by trading deadline.
    Cohen is a dope.  Mets are bad for MLB.

    Go ahead and rip me, Mets fans, your franchise is problematic.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,173
    igotid88 said:
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    I guess it was the Dodgers' to lose. If the Yankees had offered the same they'd most likely would have chosen the Dodgers. Also their system has been working. Maybe not so much in the playoffs but for the season they're going to get 95+ wins. Also the NL west hasn't been that competitive. They could have joined Arizona or San Diego to make it more interesting. 
    “Their system”? they don’t have a system. They have gobs of money. At least the Yankees teams most of us hated developed a few of their own stars.
    Talking about their analytics team and Andrew Friedman. Made the Rays a better team and got the Dodgers to where they are now. 
    it’s not analytics, it’s money.
    Obviously money helps. But the Rays weren't spending. If Robert's were to leave or be fired and go to a different team that spends as much. He won't be averaging 100 wins 
    moot point, since there is no other team “that spends as much.”

    F’me - a bunch of teams are “problematic.” MLB should, but won’t, do more to promote parity.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    I guess it was the Dodgers' to lose. If the Yankees had offered the same they'd most likely would have chosen the Dodgers. Also their system has been working. Maybe not so much in the playoffs but for the season they're going to get 95+ wins. Also the NL west hasn't been that competitive. They could have joined Arizona or San Diego to make it more interesting. 
    “Their system”? they don’t have a system. They have gobs of money. At least the Yankees teams most of us hated developed a few of their own stars.
    Talking about their analytics team and Andrew Friedman. Made the Rays a better team and got the Dodgers to where they are now. 
    it’s not analytics, it’s money.
    Obviously money helps. But the Rays weren't spending. If Robert's were to leave or be fired and go to a different team that spends as much. He won't be averaging 100 wins 
    moot point, since there is no other team “that spends as much.”

    F’me - a bunch of teams are “problematic.” MLB should, but won’t, do more to promote parity.
    Truth.
    Idiot ownership groups all around!
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 27,991
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    Wobbie said:
    igotid88 said:
    I guess it was the Dodgers' to lose. If the Yankees had offered the same they'd most likely would have chosen the Dodgers. Also their system has been working. Maybe not so much in the playoffs but for the season they're going to get 95+ wins. Also the NL west hasn't been that competitive. They could have joined Arizona or San Diego to make it more interesting. 
    “Their system”? they don’t have a system. They have gobs of money. At least the Yankees teams most of us hated developed a few of their own stars.
    Talking about their analytics team and Andrew Friedman. Made the Rays a better team and got the Dodgers to where they are now. 
    it’s not analytics, it’s money.
    Obviously money helps. But the Rays weren't spending. If Robert's were to leave or be fired and go to a different team that spends as much. He won't be averaging 100 wins 
    moot point, since there is no other team “that spends as much.”

    F’me - a bunch of teams are “problematic.” MLB should, but won’t, do more to promote parity.
    There are at least 2 teams that can spend that much 
    I miss igotid88
  • $23MM for Teoscar?
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,173
    $23MM for Teoscar?
    cocksuckers find it under their couch cushions.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • MayDay10MayDay10 Posts: 11,727
    Its broken and awful.   

    Baseball will be the on the same plane as Horse Racing and Boxing in 30-50 years.  Once the most popular sports of bygone eras reduced to the fringe.
Sign In or Register to comment.