MLB 2024 Off Season

1582583585587588787

Comments

  • Lerxst1992Lerxst1992 Posts: 6,561
    Jesus,. Now you are smarter than Scott Boras?

    Fricking genius over here.  I get being smarter than me, I mean clearly you are the smartest guy in the room.  But Boras is a dummy?
    C'mon man.  Take a teency step down from the high horse you are riding around on.



    I did agree with Tempo on the quotes I read from Blake Snell.  Definitely bad optics.   I don't disagree with some of what he is saying but coming out with it that way doesn't seem to gain him much public support (nor any for other players) and this is exactly what the owners wanted when they started leaking all of this crap well before any offer was even discussed with the players.

    Messy 


    really dude? You are so smart you need to personally attack to explain how the owners are coming up with this amount of cash? Boras is an aggressive and arrogant man who only cares about padding his bank account. His bank account has a vested interest in this. Mine does not. He will say anything to contort facts to fit his narrative. If he thinks the owners are going to print $5 billion a year he is out of his mind. 

    The 10 wealthiest owners are worth about  $35 billion combined, before any losses from covid.  So these owners are going to liquidate assets during a national emergency to make the PA happy, when every single player’s contract says the commissioner has the right to suspend operations ? 
    These numbers are all garbage.  Do you realize that they don't share how much they actually make?
    I don't take any issue with people having different opinions, only when people act like their opinion is the only correct one.  We don't know.  The reporters don't know.  The owners only know, and I don't trust them - at all.
    It is my belief that owning a team has been a printing press for money for some while and as business owners they should be on position to do what is needed this season.  If they blew all of their profits then perhaps they should consider selling 
    My opinion.
    Boras knows far more than we do, and I would say far more than the reporters do about the true economics.
    I'm pretty sure I could do some digging and find out about how much a team makes a year since everything gets leaked.

    What does puzzle me is a team like the Marlins whom gets zero attendees is still open for business.  That profit sharing thing must be doing them a great service.

    As you imply, the players benefit from keeping teams like the Marlins afloat. If every team that loses money goes bankrupt that is fewer jobs for players.

    As far as the numbers being garbage, we know 70 million fans attend games and the average seat brings in about $50 with tickets, parking and concessions. On top of that are sponsors who will be cancelling sponsorships due to economic hardship. I’m sure employees at companies like Live Nation, Under Armor and Air Canada hope their companies suspend mlb sponsorships.

    As far as that $35 billion figure being garbage : https://www.therichest.com/sports-entertainment/richest-mlb-owners/

    To assume there are profit margins in a post covid mlb world, I am stumped why anyone would believe that. Pre covid, sure some owners might profit 5 To 10% of revenue, but usually that funds future  improvements or Investments in the team. Even if it is kept as cash on hand, It’s hardly enough to fund $5 billion in lost ticket revenue and sponsorships per year.

  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    Do we know that an average seat brings in about $50?

    Does the math you use for the numbers you site previously as costs the owners need to cover include the entire season or half a season?
    They don't need to pay the active players for the whole season - just for what is played, according to MLB owners' creative leaks.

    Where is your information on how much owners profited in the past?

    My largest point is that if you don't get to see their books you do not have any idea what their profits may be, in the past, nor in the future.

    You also don't know what they have done with the monies they made in the past 

    Lots of assumptions.

    Which is fine....they are assumptions, though, just like everyone else's.


    That draft deal is scummy.  
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    Why do you think they always refuse to share their books?
    It has always been, and always will be, in the owners' benefit to show that they make far less than they actually do.  
    Creative accounting is an art form, and sports owners employ some major artists.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • Lerxst1992Lerxst1992 Posts: 6,561

    The average ticket price is about $35. Parking, hotdog soda? Are we at $50 yet? Beer? Ice cream?

    Teams also could lose $1 billion from reduced TV fees from fewer games and if there is a second wave in the fall, we could lose the post season. That would be close to another billion in losses. 

    Successful companies typically profit 5 to 10%. I doubt mlb profits are that high but you are right, we don’t know for sure.

    An interesting article on baseball economics.

  • Lerxst1992Lerxst1992 Posts: 6,561
    One of the few publicly traded teams in pro sports are the Packers. In their 2019 /2018 annual report, their 2018 net profit margin was just under 9%. Their 2019 profit was much lower due to unusually large expenses, so 2018 give us a pretty good indicator of a better profit.

    My best guess is the NFL is much more profitable than MLB. They both have gross revenues around 10 billion IIRC, but the NFL does that with a tiny fraction of games compared to baseball. With 10 times the amount of games, and financing the minor leagues, baseball is more expensive to operate than football IMO.


    https://shareholder.broadridge.com/pdf/gbp/annual-report-2019.pdf
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    I saw that article through ESPN as well.  I am still skeptical.  Owners leaking as much info as they can trying to use the media to shape public opinion and force the hands of the players.
    I don't think it will work but we will see.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    Some very interesting info in here....
    The share most symbolic of the cooked books approach from MLB ownership is that they are listing the incoming draft player costs as $440MM when it really is going to cost $16MM this year.

    Just share your books if you want the union to believe you.  Something is rotten here....

    https://theathletic.com/1821460/2020/05/18/salary-staredown-inside-the-high-stakes-negotiation-to-restart-the-mlb-season?source=user-shared-article

    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,138
    Someone just paid $900K for a Mike Trout baseball card.  I thought those things became worthless after people sold their farms for beanie babies.  

    My little brain cannot fathom a little piece of cardboard being equal to 40 acres of land in our currency system.
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    Interesting ploy by the owners.  They will do anything to find the bad guys....in this case it is now the highest paid players.
    Don't think this is gonna work but it is a much smarter approach then their planned leaks last few weeks...HardballTalk : MLB’s latest proposal could drive wedge in MLBPA constituency
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,138
    I'd like for the owners to figure out how to refund my $140 for MLBTV, then they can resume floating insane offers to the players.
  • tempo_n_groovetempo_n_groove Posts: 40,246
    Jason P said:
    Someone just paid $900K for a Mike Trout baseball card.  I thought those things became worthless after people sold their farms for beanie babies.  

    My little brain cannot fathom a little piece of cardboard being equal to 40 acres of land in our currency system.
    I've been screaming about cards and their prices being crazy.  The whole industry seems to be gaining a bunch of speed and some idiot named Gary "Vee" Vatnerchuk.  It's dangerous because the guy has mass public appeal.  If he says "this is hot" the market goes crazy for that card.  It's a lot of power for someone to be yielding in the industry.

     i would expect a Superfractor of his to surface soon.

    A Super of Lindor and Yelich each sold for 100K.

    Card prices are crazy man.  I'm looking to cash out soon!
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    edited May 2020
    Gary Vee is awesome - very positive influence on people and society vs most of the assholes clogging up everything these days.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,805
    I can't stand that dude. I followed him on Twitter/Insta for a couple months a while back and all he did was create content about creating content. 'You gotta create content, you gotta create content, you gotta create content!" ALL YOUR CONTENT IS IS TELLING PEOPLE TO CREATE CONTENT IN A LOUD VOICE TALKING EXTREMELY FAST.
  • tempo_n_groovetempo_n_groove Posts: 40,246
    Gary Vee is awesome - very positive influence on people and society vs most of the assholes clogging up everything these days.
    Fucking hack in the card industry as far as I'm concerned.  He's a pied piper.

    If he's done other good thing's then great just stay out of the card industry.

    He's like a Kardashian...
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    Ha.  I like his hustle.  Like his positivity.  He is a marketer, you gotta give him props for creating his market.

    I don't know anything about his impact on collecting sports cards though.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    Things went poorly yesterday....or, as expected

    MLPA indicates, clearly, that they don't buy the bullshit that MLB owners and their circus barkers (ESPN MLB lead shill Jeff Passan especially) have been pushing for an agenda.
    No proof of the crazy and inconsistent claims owners are making.
    No further cuts are going to be accepted.

    The shill now leaks that MLBPA is going to counter with a hundred game schedule.  
    Will be interesting to see that.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • pjhawkspjhawks Posts: 12,501
    Things went poorly yesterday....or, as expected

    MLPA indicates, clearly, that they don't buy the bullshit that MLB owners and their circus barkers (ESPN MLB lead shill Jeff Passan especially) have been pushing for an agenda.
    No proof of the crazy and inconsistent claims owners are making.
    No further cuts are going to be accepted.

    The shill now leaks that MLBPA is going to counter with a hundred game schedule.  
    Will be interesting to see that.
    the players are so out of touch and they are going to come out of this looking really poorly.  
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    edited May 2020
    I don't blame them for their stance.  We can see this is going to be a "sides" type of argument among fans.  
    I say F the owners.  Open your books if you are sincere.
    I know a few here agree.
    Also know that there are some who think the players are all assholes who shouldn't whine about making a large amount of money.

    We will get to see it play out but we know which sides the both of us chose.  ;)

    We also know we both do want to see baseball under the right conditions.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,805
    pjhawks said:
    Things went poorly yesterday....or, as expected

    MLPA indicates, clearly, that they don't buy the bullshit that MLB owners and their circus barkers (ESPN MLB lead shill Jeff Passan especially) have been pushing for an agenda.
    No proof of the crazy and inconsistent claims owners are making.
    No further cuts are going to be accepted.

    The shill now leaks that MLBPA is going to counter with a hundred game schedule.  
    Will be interesting to see that.
    the players are so out of touch and they are going to come out of this looking really poorly.  
    What incentive does JT Realmuto have to play if he is making peanuts on the dollar, in a compressed schedule where injuries are more likely and he is going to be a free agent after the season?
  • pjhawkspjhawks Posts: 12,501
    pjhawks said:
    Things went poorly yesterday....or, as expected

    MLPA indicates, clearly, that they don't buy the bullshit that MLB owners and their circus barkers (ESPN MLB lead shill Jeff Passan especially) have been pushing for an agenda.
    No proof of the crazy and inconsistent claims owners are making.
    No further cuts are going to be accepted.

    The shill now leaks that MLBPA is going to counter with a hundred game schedule.  
    Will be interesting to see that.
    the players are so out of touch and they are going to come out of this looking really poorly.  
    What incentive does JT Realmuto have to play if he is making peanuts on the dollar, in a compressed schedule where injuries are more likely and he is going to be a free agent after the season?
    that attitude is going to really go over well with 30 million people currently unemployed and people stuck at home.  it's not going to be a good look to say you won't work for a few million dollars to play 82 games regardless if that is a 60% pay cut.   there is just no way to sell that attitude to the public.
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,805
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    Things went poorly yesterday....or, as expected

    MLPA indicates, clearly, that they don't buy the bullshit that MLB owners and their circus barkers (ESPN MLB lead shill Jeff Passan especially) have been pushing for an agenda.
    No proof of the crazy and inconsistent claims owners are making.
    No further cuts are going to be accepted.

    The shill now leaks that MLBPA is going to counter with a hundred game schedule.  
    Will be interesting to see that.
    the players are so out of touch and they are going to come out of this looking really poorly.  
    What incentive does JT Realmuto have to play if he is making peanuts on the dollar, in a compressed schedule where injuries are more likely and he is going to be a free agent after the season?
    that attitude is going to really go over well with 30 million people currently unemployed and people stuck at home.  it's not going to be a good look to say you won't work for a few million dollars to play 82 games regardless if that is a 60% pay cut.   there is just no way to sell that attitude to the public.
    Yawn, all things are not equal.
  • pjhawkspjhawks Posts: 12,501
    edited May 2020
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    Things went poorly yesterday....or, as expected

    MLPA indicates, clearly, that they don't buy the bullshit that MLB owners and their circus barkers (ESPN MLB lead shill Jeff Passan especially) have been pushing for an agenda.
    No proof of the crazy and inconsistent claims owners are making.
    No further cuts are going to be accepted.

    The shill now leaks that MLBPA is going to counter with a hundred game schedule.  
    Will be interesting to see that.
    the players are so out of touch and they are going to come out of this looking really poorly.  
    What incentive does JT Realmuto have to play if he is making peanuts on the dollar, in a compressed schedule where injuries are more likely and he is going to be a free agent after the season?
    that attitude is going to really go over well with 30 million people currently unemployed and people stuck at home.  it's not going to be a good look to say you won't work for a few million dollars to play 82 games regardless if that is a 60% pay cut.   there is just no way to sell that attitude to the public.
    Yawn, all things are not equal.
    my original comment was that the players will come out looking poorly in this.  so yea maybe it's not equal but it's hard to see that the playes are going to get any sympathy from the public with this stance. especially as other sports come back.

    edit: so Realmuto was set to make $10 million this year.  so the argument being made based on the current proposals is the difference for him in making $5 million or $4 million for half a season.  Just no way that plays well with the public.
    Post edited by pjhawks on
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    Agree with Cliffy.  If I am Realmuto there is no way I am all in for discounted service time.
    The public can get riled up by the Owners but I would not let that bother me too much.  

    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • PoncierPoncier Posts: 16,816
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    Things went poorly yesterday....or, as expected

    MLPA indicates, clearly, that they don't buy the bullshit that MLB owners and their circus barkers (ESPN MLB lead shill Jeff Passan especially) have been pushing for an agenda.
    No proof of the crazy and inconsistent claims owners are making.
    No further cuts are going to be accepted.

    The shill now leaks that MLBPA is going to counter with a hundred game schedule.  
    Will be interesting to see that.
    the players are so out of touch and they are going to come out of this looking really poorly.  
    What incentive does JT Realmuto have to play if he is making peanuts on the dollar, in a compressed schedule where injuries are more likely and he is going to be a free agent after the season?
    that attitude is going to really go over well with 30 million people currently unemployed and people stuck at home.  it's not going to be a good look to say you won't work for a few million dollars to play 82 games regardless if that is a 60% pay cut.   there is just no way to sell that attitude to the public.
    Yawn, all things are not equal.
    my original comment was that the players will come out looking poorly in this.  so yea maybe it's not equal but it's hard to see that the playes are going to get any sympathy from the public with this stance. especially as other sports come back.

    edit: so Realmuto was set to make $10 million this year.  so the argument being made based on the current proposals is the difference for him in making $5 million or $4 million for half a season.  Just no way that plays well with the public.
    I think you are misinterpreting the 40% for a player up to 10 Mil. That would be 40% of his prorated salary, not 40% of his total salary, $2.44Mil according to this article:

    https://www.philliesnation.com/2020/05/how-much-would-key-phillies-make-under-new-mlb-proposal/

    And a guy like Trout who had a contract for $37.66Mil for the season, would get a prorated salary of $19Mil for 82 games would now instead get $5.75 Mil under the owners new proposal

    https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/29229007/is-mlb-proposal-first-step-playing-ball-2020-beginning-end

     Did MLB really suggest that Mike Trout, the best player in baseball, a paragon for what the sport can and should be, take a pay cut from his prorated salary of $19,065,843 to $5,748,577? It did. The proposed cuts would work on a sliding scale. Young players making minimum salaries would be the greatest beneficiaries, with their pay cut only 10% as opposed to the near 70% Trout would take off his prorated share. Compared to his full-season salary of $37,666,666, it would represent an 85% cut.

    I think the public will side far more with players than owners under this proposal.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • tempo_n_groovetempo_n_groove Posts: 40,246
    Poncier said:
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    Things went poorly yesterday....or, as expected

    MLPA indicates, clearly, that they don't buy the bullshit that MLB owners and their circus barkers (ESPN MLB lead shill Jeff Passan especially) have been pushing for an agenda.
    No proof of the crazy and inconsistent claims owners are making.
    No further cuts are going to be accepted.

    The shill now leaks that MLBPA is going to counter with a hundred game schedule.  
    Will be interesting to see that.
    the players are so out of touch and they are going to come out of this looking really poorly.  
    What incentive does JT Realmuto have to play if he is making peanuts on the dollar, in a compressed schedule where injuries are more likely and he is going to be a free agent after the season?
    that attitude is going to really go over well with 30 million people currently unemployed and people stuck at home.  it's not going to be a good look to say you won't work for a few million dollars to play 82 games regardless if that is a 60% pay cut.   there is just no way to sell that attitude to the public.
    Yawn, all things are not equal.
    my original comment was that the players will come out looking poorly in this.  so yea maybe it's not equal but it's hard to see that the playes are going to get any sympathy from the public with this stance. especially as other sports come back.

    edit: so Realmuto was set to make $10 million this year.  so the argument being made based on the current proposals is the difference for him in making $5 million or $4 million for half a season.  Just no way that plays well with the public.
    I think you are misinterpreting the 40% for a player up to 10 Mil. That would be 40% of his prorated salary, not 40% of his total salary, $2.44Mil according to this article:

    https://www.philliesnation.com/2020/05/how-much-would-key-phillies-make-under-new-mlb-proposal/

    And a guy like Trout who had a contract for $37.66Mil for the season, would get a prorated salary of $19Mil for 82 games would now instead get $5.75 Mil under the owners new proposal

    https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/29229007/is-mlb-proposal-first-step-playing-ball-2020-beginning-end

     Did MLB really suggest that Mike Trout, the best player in baseball, a paragon for what the sport can and should be, take a pay cut from his prorated salary of $19,065,843 to $5,748,577? It did. The proposed cuts would work on a sliding scale. Young players making minimum salaries would be the greatest beneficiaries, with their pay cut only 10% as opposed to the near 70% Trout would take off his prorated share. Compared to his full-season salary of $37,666,666, it would represent an 85% cut.

    I think the public will side far more with players than owners under this proposal.
    If that is the creative accounting that has been announced then I'd live off my nest egg too then.

    No way that this is the monetary equation the owners came up with though?
  • pjhawkspjhawks Posts: 12,501
    Poncier said:
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    Things went poorly yesterday....or, as expected

    MLPA indicates, clearly, that they don't buy the bullshit that MLB owners and their circus barkers (ESPN MLB lead shill Jeff Passan especially) have been pushing for an agenda.
    No proof of the crazy and inconsistent claims owners are making.
    No further cuts are going to be accepted.

    The shill now leaks that MLBPA is going to counter with a hundred game schedule.  
    Will be interesting to see that.
    the players are so out of touch and they are going to come out of this looking really poorly.  
    What incentive does JT Realmuto have to play if he is making peanuts on the dollar, in a compressed schedule where injuries are more likely and he is going to be a free agent after the season?
    that attitude is going to really go over well with 30 million people currently unemployed and people stuck at home.  it's not going to be a good look to say you won't work for a few million dollars to play 82 games regardless if that is a 60% pay cut.   there is just no way to sell that attitude to the public.
    Yawn, all things are not equal.
    my original comment was that the players will come out looking poorly in this.  so yea maybe it's not equal but it's hard to see that the playes are going to get any sympathy from the public with this stance. especially as other sports come back.

    edit: so Realmuto was set to make $10 million this year.  so the argument being made based on the current proposals is the difference for him in making $5 million or $4 million for half a season.  Just no way that plays well with the public.
    I think you are misinterpreting the 40% for a player up to 10 Mil. That would be 40% of his prorated salary, not 40% of his total salary, $2.44Mil according to this article:

    https://www.philliesnation.com/2020/05/how-much-would-key-phillies-make-under-new-mlb-proposal/

    And a guy like Trout who had a contract for $37.66Mil for the season, would get a prorated salary of $19Mil for 82 games would now instead get $5.75 Mil under the owners new proposal

    https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/29229007/is-mlb-proposal-first-step-playing-ball-2020-beginning-end

     Did MLB really suggest that Mike Trout, the best player in baseball, a paragon for what the sport can and should be, take a pay cut from his prorated salary of $19,065,843 to $5,748,577? It did. The proposed cuts would work on a sliding scale. Young players making minimum salaries would be the greatest beneficiaries, with their pay cut only 10% as opposed to the near 70% Trout would take off his prorated share. Compared to his full-season salary of $37,666,666, it would represent an 85% cut.

    I think the public will side far more with players than owners under this proposal.
    today's Philly Inquirer has Realmuto making $4 million under the latest proposal.  even if it's 40% of his prorated salary you are talking he will make $2 million.  you think the public is going to side with a guy who will still make $2 million to play half a season? i don't see it. 
  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain Posts: 31,177
    Poncier said:
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    Things went poorly yesterday....or, as expected

    MLPA indicates, clearly, that they don't buy the bullshit that MLB owners and their circus barkers (ESPN MLB lead shill Jeff Passan especially) have been pushing for an agenda.
    No proof of the crazy and inconsistent claims owners are making.
    No further cuts are going to be accepted.

    The shill now leaks that MLBPA is going to counter with a hundred game schedule.  
    Will be interesting to see that.
    the players are so out of touch and they are going to come out of this looking really poorly.  
    What incentive does JT Realmuto have to play if he is making peanuts on the dollar, in a compressed schedule where injuries are more likely and he is going to be a free agent after the season?
    that attitude is going to really go over well with 30 million people currently unemployed and people stuck at home.  it's not going to be a good look to say you won't work for a few million dollars to play 82 games regardless if that is a 60% pay cut.   there is just no way to sell that attitude to the public.
    Yawn, all things are not equal.
    my original comment was that the players will come out looking poorly in this.  so yea maybe it's not equal but it's hard to see that the playes are going to get any sympathy from the public with this stance. especially as other sports come back.

    edit: so Realmuto was set to make $10 million this year.  so the argument being made based on the current proposals is the difference for him in making $5 million or $4 million for half a season.  Just no way that plays well with the public.
    I think you are misinterpreting the 40% for a player up to 10 Mil. That would be 40% of his prorated salary, not 40% of his total salary, $2.44Mil according to this article:

    https://www.philliesnation.com/2020/05/how-much-would-key-phillies-make-under-new-mlb-proposal/

    And a guy like Trout who had a contract for $37.66Mil for the season, would get a prorated salary of $19Mil for 82 games would now instead get $5.75 Mil under the owners new proposal

    https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/29229007/is-mlb-proposal-first-step-playing-ball-2020-beginning-end

     Did MLB really suggest that Mike Trout, the best player in baseball, a paragon for what the sport can and should be, take a pay cut from his prorated salary of $19,065,843 to $5,748,577? It did. The proposed cuts would work on a sliding scale. Young players making minimum salaries would be the greatest beneficiaries, with their pay cut only 10% as opposed to the near 70% Trout would take off his prorated share. Compared to his full-season salary of $37,666,666, it would represent an 85% cut.

    I think the public will side far more with players than owners under this proposal.
    If that is the creative accounting that has been announced then I'd live off my nest egg too then.

    No way that this is the monetary equation the owners came up with though?
    I think the plan was shared (as opposed to the many leaks the past few weeks which filtered out through the Passan Owner Mouthpiece) with the players.  I read in a few spots and the details seemed to line up.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,805
    Who gives a shit who the public sides with? The public are generally morons. Why would and why should someone like JT Realmuto risk a a payday that will set their family up for generations over a salary he feels isn't fair?

    Football players hold out over contracts they agreed to all the time and mouth-breathers don't get their panties in a bunch over that.
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,805
    edited May 2020
    Who knew Passan was such a shill?
Sign In or Register to comment.