MLB 2024 Off Season

1184185187189190788

Comments

  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,827
    imalive wrote:
    SVRDhand13 wrote:
    Okay can we get back to baseball? :D

    It's norm's fault :shh:
    polaris_x wrote:
    Flagg wrote:
    Yu! Yu! Yu!

    kid is the real deal ...

    money well spent.....as opposed to albert's deal :shock:

    I think he's gonna be real good. He's going to have to get through the leauge a couple times before it's for sure, but signs are pointing to him being really really good. God damn, Yankees. Should have listened to me.
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,140
    Cliffy6745 wrote:

    I think he's gonna be real good. He's going to have to get through the leauge a couple times before it's for sure, but signs are pointing to him being really really good. God damn, Yankees. Should have listened to me.

    yeah, second time thru could be telling.

    and, hell yes, the yanks should be listening to cliffy just like the giants should be listening to me (release huff).
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,827
    imalive wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:

    I think he's gonna be real good. He's going to have to get through the leauge a couple times before it's for sure, but signs are pointing to him being really really good. God damn, Yankees. Should have listened to me.

    yeah, second time thru could be telling.

    and, hell yes, the yanks should be listening to cliffy just like the giants should be listening to me (release huff).

    :lol::lol:

    It's a shame all we do is post these recommendations on a Pearl Jam message board, rather than getting paid millions for them.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    the los angeles dodgers are no longer owned by frank mcccourt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    :mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen:
  • SVRDhand13SVRDhand13 Posts: 26,162
    imalive wrote:
    money well spent.....as opposed to albert's deal :shock:

    0 home runs in April. Ouch!!! :fp:
    severed hand thirteen
    2006: Gorge 7/23 2008: Hartford 6/27 Beacon 7/1 2009: Spectrum 10/30-31
    2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
    2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
    2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
    2017: RRHoF 4/7   2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4   2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18 
    2022: MSG 9/11  2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    norm wrote:
    the los angeles dodgers are no longer owned by frank mcccourt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    :mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen:

    the guy that wrote angelas ashes owned the dodgers??? :shock:
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,140
    norm wrote:
    the los angeles dodgers are no longer owned by frank mcccourt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    :mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen:

    he's lurking....looking for an opportunity to get back in.
    SVRDhand13 wrote:
    imalive wrote:
    money well spent.....as opposed to albert's deal :shock:

    0 home runs in April. Ouch!!! :fp:

    angel pagan has FOUR :shock:
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    imalive wrote:
    norm wrote:
    the los angeles dodgers are no longer owned by frank mcccourt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    :mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen:

    he's lurking....looking for an opportunity to get back in.

    considering he now owns or co- owns all the property around the stadium i don't think we'll ever be rid of him
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,140
    norm wrote:
    imalive wrote:
    norm wrote:
    the los angeles dodgers are no longer owned by frank mcccourt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    :mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen:

    he's lurking....looking for an opportunity to get back in.

    considering he now owns or co- owns all the property around the stadium i don't think we'll ever be rid of him

    like a cockroach :lol:

    find or make a jpg
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • perfectlefts14perfectlefts14 Posts: 2,030
    norm wrote:
    the los angeles dodgers are no longer owned by frank mcccourt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    :mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen:
    It's about time! How long before parking costs more than a ticket to the game?
    Tell the captain
    'This boats not safe
    And we're drowning.'
  • SVRDhand13SVRDhand13 Posts: 26,162
    SI Power Rankings get even worse: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/b ... =hp_t12_a4

    Royals at #9 and Detroit at #30.
    severed hand thirteen
    2006: Gorge 7/23 2008: Hartford 6/27 Beacon 7/1 2009: Spectrum 10/30-31
    2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
    2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
    2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
    2017: RRHoF 4/7   2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4   2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18 
    2022: MSG 9/11  2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
  • The FixerThe Fixer Posts: 12,837
    SVRDhand13 wrote:
    SI Power Rankings get even worse: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/b ... =hp_t12_a4

    Royals at #9 and Detroit at #30.

    these things are created strictly for reactionary purposes. reactions = readership

    bottom line...they're pointless
  • SVRDhand13SVRDhand13 Posts: 26,162
    The Fixer wrote:
    SVRDhand13 wrote:
    SI Power Rankings get even worse: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/b ... =hp_t12_a4

    Royals at #9 and Detroit at #30.

    these things are created strictly for reactionary purposes. reactions = readership

    bottom line...they're pointless

    I agree, but I have never seen them be this over the top before.
    severed hand thirteen
    2006: Gorge 7/23 2008: Hartford 6/27 Beacon 7/1 2009: Spectrum 10/30-31
    2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
    2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
    2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
    2017: RRHoF 4/7   2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4   2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18 
    2022: MSG 9/11  2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
  • Monster RainMonster Rain Posts: 1,415
    SVRDhand13 wrote:
    The Fixer wrote:
    SVRDhand13 wrote:
    SI Power Rankings get even worse: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/b ... =hp_t12_a4

    Royals at #9 and Detroit at #30.

    these things are created strictly for reactionary purposes. reactions = readership

    bottom line...they're pointless

    I agree, but I have never seen them be this over the top before.

    I don't know what's going on at si.com lately but their baseball coverage this season seems to be taking a turn towards becoming SABR-centric to the point of absurdity. Not only are the rankings becoming completely ridiculous, there's an article by Cliff Corcoran about Matt Kemp's April performance that mentions a stat I've never seen before called GPA (Gross Production Average). He tries to explain why this stat is better that OPS but fails. He says it gives OBP its "proper weight" by multiplying it by 1.8 before adding it to SLG and then converting it into a percentage like batting average. However, he doesn't explain why multiplying OBP by 1.8 gives it its "proper weight," how someone came up with 1.8 as the magic number to use, or how that is then converted into GPA since the formula (OBP X 1.8) + SLG doesn't equal the numbers he gives for GPA. I figured out that he divides that total by 4, but I don't see a reason for it and he doesn't even tell you that he does that let alone say why.
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,140

    I don't know what's going on at si.com lately but their baseball coverage this season seems to be taking a turn towards becoming SABR-centric to the point of absurdity. Not only are the rankings becoming completely ridiculous, there's an article by Cliff Corcoran about Matt Kemp's April performance that mentions a stat I've never seen before called GPA (Gross Production Average). He tries to explain why this stat is better that OPS but fails. He says it gives OBP its "proper weight" by multiplying it by 1.8 before adding it to SLG and then converting it into a percentage like batting average. However, he doesn't explain why multiplying OBP by 1.8 gives it its "proper weight," how someone came up with 1.8 as the magic number to use, or how that is then converted into GPA since the formula (OBP X 1.8) + SLG doesn't equal the numbers he gives for GPA. I figured out that he divides that total by 4, but I don't see a reason for it and he doesn't even tell you that he does that let alone say why.

    I prefer to judge baseball with my eyes.....rather than with a slide rule :wtf:
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • SVRDhand13SVRDhand13 Posts: 26,162
    I don't know what's going on at si.com lately but their baseball coverage this season seems to be taking a turn towards becoming SABR-centric to the point of absurdity. Not only are the rankings becoming completely ridiculous, there's an article by Cliff Corcoran about Matt Kemp's April performance that mentions a stat I've never seen before called GPA (Gross Production Average). He tries to explain why this stat is better that OPS but fails. He says it gives OBP its "proper weight" by multiplying it by 1.8 before adding it to SLG and then converting it into a percentage like batting average. However, he doesn't explain why multiplying OBP by 1.8 gives it its "proper weight," how someone came up with 1.8 as the magic number to use, or how that is then converted into GPA since the formula (OBP X 1.8) + SLG doesn't equal the numbers he gives for GPA. I figured out that he divides that total by 4, but I don't see a reason for it and he doesn't even tell you that he does that let alone say why.

    :? My head is spinning.

    At least when ESPN made up their QBR, they explained it.
    severed hand thirteen
    2006: Gorge 7/23 2008: Hartford 6/27 Beacon 7/1 2009: Spectrum 10/30-31
    2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
    2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
    2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
    2017: RRHoF 4/7   2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4   2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18 
    2022: MSG 9/11  2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,827
    SVRDhand13 wrote:
    I don't know what's going on at si.com lately but their baseball coverage this season seems to be taking a turn towards becoming SABR-centric to the point of absurdity. Not only are the rankings becoming completely ridiculous, there's an article by Cliff Corcoran about Matt Kemp's April performance that mentions a stat I've never seen before called GPA (Gross Production Average). He tries to explain why this stat is better that OPS but fails. He says it gives OBP its "proper weight" by multiplying it by 1.8 before adding it to SLG and then converting it into a percentage like batting average. However, he doesn't explain why multiplying OBP by 1.8 gives it its "proper weight," how someone came up with 1.8 as the magic number to use, or how that is then converted into GPA since the formula (OBP X 1.8) + SLG doesn't equal the numbers he gives for GPA. I figured out that he divides that total by 4, but I don't see a reason for it and he doesn't even tell you that he does that let alone say why.

    :? My head is spinning.

    At least when ESPN made up their QBR, they explained it.

    That's strange. I haven't read Cliff Corcoran since he left Bronx Banter, but I always liked his writing a lot. Been a couple years though. Losing Joe Poz has to hurt SI.
  • 8181 Posts: 58,276
    imalive wrote:

    I don't know what's going on at si.com lately but their baseball coverage this season seems to be taking a turn towards becoming SABR-centric to the point of absurdity. Not only are the rankings becoming completely ridiculous, there's an article by Cliff Corcoran about Matt Kemp's April performance that mentions a stat I've never seen before called GPA (Gross Production Average). He tries to explain why this stat is better that OPS but fails. He says it gives OBP its "proper weight" by multiplying it by 1.8 before adding it to SLG and then converting it into a percentage like batting average. However, he doesn't explain why multiplying OBP by 1.8 gives it its "proper weight," how someone came up with 1.8 as the magic number to use, or how that is then converted into GPA since the formula (OBP X 1.8) + SLG doesn't equal the numbers he gives for GPA. I figured out that he divides that total by 4, but I don't see a reason for it and he doesn't even tell you that he does that let alone say why.

    I prefer to judge baseball with my eyes.....rather than with a slide rule :wtf:

    no kidding.... :fp:

    if i want stats, just give me the basic box score stats....i shouldn't need to be a rocket scientist to figure things out.

    it's best to just watch the game and avoid reading about it.
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • DS1119DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    imalive wrote:

    I don't know what's going on at si.com lately but their baseball coverage this season seems to be taking a turn towards becoming SABR-centric to the point of absurdity. Not only are the rankings becoming completely ridiculous, there's an article by Cliff Corcoran about Matt Kemp's April performance that mentions a stat I've never seen before called GPA (Gross Production Average). He tries to explain why this stat is better that OPS but fails. He says it gives OBP its "proper weight" by multiplying it by 1.8 before adding it to SLG and then converting it into a percentage like batting average. However, he doesn't explain why multiplying OBP by 1.8 gives it its "proper weight," how someone came up with 1.8 as the magic number to use, or how that is then converted into GPA since the formula (OBP X 1.8) + SLG doesn't equal the numbers he gives for GPA. I figured out that he divides that total by 4, but I don't see a reason for it and he doesn't even tell you that he does that let alone say why.

    I prefer to judge baseball with my eyes.....rather than with a slide rule :wtf:


    I agree. I always used to say that during the heyday of the Jeter, Garciaparra, ARod debates over who was the best SS. ARod and Nomar were putting up monster stats and all Jeter was doing was winning rings. I'll take the rings.
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,827
    DS1119 wrote:
    imalive wrote:

    I don't know what's going on at si.com lately but their baseball coverage this season seems to be taking a turn towards becoming SABR-centric to the point of absurdity. Not only are the rankings becoming completely ridiculous, there's an article by Cliff Corcoran about Matt Kemp's April performance that mentions a stat I've never seen before called GPA (Gross Production Average). He tries to explain why this stat is better that OPS but fails. He says it gives OBP its "proper weight" by multiplying it by 1.8 before adding it to SLG and then converting it into a percentage like batting average. However, he doesn't explain why multiplying OBP by 1.8 gives it its "proper weight," how someone came up with 1.8 as the magic number to use, or how that is then converted into GPA since the formula (OBP X 1.8) + SLG doesn't equal the numbers he gives for GPA. I figured out that he divides that total by 4, but I don't see a reason for it and he doesn't even tell you that he does that let alone say why.

    I prefer to judge baseball with my eyes.....rather than with a slide rule :wtf:


    I agree. I always used to say that during the heyday of the Jeter, Garciaparra, ARod debates over who was the best SS. ARod and Nomar were putting up monster stats and all Jeter was doing was winning rings. I'll take the rings.

    I love Jeter, but either of those players would have won rigns with those Yankees teams.
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,827
    Some of the stats are good, some are overboard. I like WAR but think it's directional and is obviously a summary of a lot of other stats. OPS and OPS+ are great. Defensive stats still aren't great. I don't have to get into pitchers stats too much, think WHIP, ERA and ERA+ are perfect.
  • DS1119DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    I love Jeter, but either of those players would have won rigns with those Yankees teams.


    Intangibles. Neither of those guys would have been embraced like Jeter and certainly neither of those two are Captain's material.
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,827
    DS1119 wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    I love Jeter, but either of those players would have won rigns with those Yankees teams.


    Intangibles. Neither of those guys would have been embraced like Jeter and certainly neither of those two are Captain's material.

    Dude, if Arod came up with the Yankees and hit .358 with 36 home runs in his first season there would be daily comparsions to Babe Ruth. Hindsight is 20/20.
  • DS1119DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    I love Jeter, but either of those players would have won rigns with those Yankees teams.


    Intangibles. Neither of those guys would have been embraced like Jeter and certainly neither of those two are Captain's material.

    Dude, if Arod came up with the Yankees and hit .358 with 36 home runs in his first season there would be daily comparsions to Babe Ruth. Hindsight is 20/20.


    I truly don't believe that but to each his own. As you know Yankee fans have that ability to pick out the quality people and teammates and appreciate them for that. I mean Nick Swisher is a bigger rock star to Yankee fans than ARod could ever dream to be.
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,827
    DS1119 wrote:

    I truly don't believe that but to each his own. As you know Yankee fans have that ability to pick out the quality people and teammates and appreciate them for that. I mean Nick Swisher is a bigger rock star to Yankee fans than ARod could ever dream to be.

    People like Roger Clemens? He's a fucking dirtball and got one of the biggest ovations I can remember. All you gotta do is perform and win.

    Edit: And don't get me wrong, Jeter is by far my favorite player ever. But if he started on the Mariners and Arod started on the Yankees, before PEDs, Arod would have had Mickey Mantle hype.
  • DS1119DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:

    I truly don't believe that but to each his own. As you know Yankee fans have that ability to pick out the quality people and teammates and appreciate them for that. I mean Nick Swisher is a bigger rock star to Yankee fans than ARod could ever dream to be.

    People like Roger Clemens? He's a fucking dirtball and got one of the biggest ovations I can remember. All you gotta do is perform and win.


    And I remember ARod getting some big ovations. I also remember him being booed pretty hard quite a bit. I remember Jeter geting booed once at the Stadium when he opened the season in that horrible slump, I think it was 06 maybe 07, it made the papers and pretty much that shit stopped quickly. We're kind of debating nothing here. :lol: All I will say is I will take what I see on the ball field over what I see with the numbers anyday. I have yet to still see this play in the stats.


    derek-jeter-dive-into-stands.jpg
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,827
    DS1119 wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:

    I truly don't believe that but to each his own. As you know Yankee fans have that ability to pick out the quality people and teammates and appreciate them for that. I mean Nick Swisher is a bigger rock star to Yankee fans than ARod could ever dream to be.

    People like Roger Clemens? He's a fucking dirtball and got one of the biggest ovations I can remember. All you gotta do is perform and win.


    And I remember ARod getting some big ovations. I also remember him being booed pretty hard quite a bit. I remember Jeter geting booed once at the Stadium when he opened the season in that horrible slump, I think it was 06 maybe 07, it made the papers and pretty much that shit stopped quickly. We're kind of debating nothing here. :lol: All I will say is I will take what I see on the ball field over what I see with the numbers anyday. I have yet to still see this play in the stats.


    derek-jeter-dive-into-stands.jpg

    Great play. And anyway you want to look at it, Jeter is currently better than Arod, which is pretty crazy.
  • Newch91Newch91 Posts: 17,560
    DS1119 wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:

    I truly don't believe that but to each his own. As you know Yankee fans have that ability to pick out the quality people and teammates and appreciate them for that. I mean Nick Swisher is a bigger rock star to Yankee fans than ARod could ever dream to be.

    People like Roger Clemens? He's a fucking dirtball and got one of the biggest ovations I can remember. All you gotta do is perform and win.


    And I remember ARod getting some big ovations. I also remember him being booed pretty hard quite a bit. I remember Jeter geting booed once at the Stadium when he opened the season in that horrible slump, I think it was 06 maybe 07, it made the papers and pretty much that shit stopped quickly. We're kind of debating nothing here. :lol: All I will say is I will take what I see on the ball field over what I see with the numbers anyday. I have yet to still see this play in the stats.


    derek-jeter-dive-into-stands.jpg
    Or...

    the_flip_display_image.jpg?1287173054
    Shows: 6.27.08 Hartford, CT/5.15.10 Hartford, CT/6.18.2011 Hartford, CT (EV Solo)/10.19.13 Brooklyn/10.25.13 Hartford
    "Becoming a Bruce fan is like hitting puberty as a musical fan. It's inevitable." - dcfaithful
  • DS1119DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    Newch91 wrote:
    Or...

    the_flip_display_image.jpg?1287173054


    I love in an interview with Jason Giambi when he came the follwoing year they asked him about this play and he was laughing. SOmething about he didn't see them practicing it. :lol: You can't practice shit like that. You just do it.
  • SVRDhand13SVRDhand13 Posts: 26,162
    DS1119 wrote:
    Newch91 wrote:
    Or...

    the_flip_display_image.jpg?1287173054

    Jeremy "I'm too good to slide" Giambi
    severed hand thirteen
    2006: Gorge 7/23 2008: Hartford 6/27 Beacon 7/1 2009: Spectrum 10/30-31
    2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
    2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
    2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
    2017: RRHoF 4/7   2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4   2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18 
    2022: MSG 9/11  2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
Sign In or Register to comment.