
Thirty Bills Unpaid wrote:He then tried to go buy a rifle and was denied for reasons unstated (newscaster said there is a waiting period which might have been one).
Newch91 wrote:Thirty Bills Unpaid wrote:He then tried to go buy a rifle and was denied for reasons unstated (newscaster said there is a waiting period which might have been one).
The gunman was 20. Connecticut law is 21 to buy a gun. There is also a waiting period.
Thirty Bills Unpaid wrote:Newch91 wrote:Thirty Bills Unpaid wrote:He then tried to go buy a rifle and was denied for reasons unstated (newscaster said there is a waiting period which might have been one).
The gunman was 20. Connecticut law is 21 to buy a gun. There is also a waiting period.
Thanks!
PJ_Soul wrote:Yeah, it was first reported that the long gun was in the car (I mentioned thatyselfnin some other thread right after it happened). But it's really old news now that that was NOT in fact the case, and that he did use the long gun in the killing. It was, in fact, the main weapon used. If you don't known this by now unsung, you are wearing some SERIOUS blinders. If you are going to use a recent tragedy to support your views, then you should probably pay closer attention to the details of the tragedy.
The media did a poor job of reporting at first with this.
unsung wrote:You mean much has been changed.
The gun was found in the car.
Rahm Emmanuel said, "never let a good crisis go to waste."
It's wool pulled over the eyes of America.
aerial wrote:What about the two men running from the scene the cops chased down in the woods? Anyone heard who these guys were?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Karmaholic1 and 17 guests
ICON LEGEND:
Announcement |
Sticky |
Unread posts |
No unread posts |
Locked |
Moved |
Popular