AMT

This discussion was created from comments split from: Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg on cover of TIME.

Comments

  • i_lov_iti_lov_it Perth, Western Australia Posts: 4,007
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,808
    a 16 year old climate activist as time's person of the year is a "sad day for humanity?". given your "what a fucking whore" comment on AOC, I figured you'd have something a little more disgusting to say about her. 
    Darwinspeed, all. 

    Cheers,

    HFD




  • i_lov_iti_lov_it Perth, Western Australia Posts: 4,007
    a 16 year old climate activist as time's person of the year is a "sad day for humanity?". given your "what a fucking whore" comment on AOC, I figured you'd have something a little more disgusting to say about her. 
    Trolling much
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,808
    that word doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. :lol:
    Darwinspeed, all. 

    Cheers,

    HFD




  • i_lov_iti_lov_it Perth, Western Australia Posts: 4,007
    that word doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. :lol:
    You should be telling yourself the same thing lol
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,808
    nah, i'm good. 
    Darwinspeed, all. 

    Cheers,

    HFD




  • i_lov_iti_lov_it Perth, Western Australia Posts: 4,007
    nah, i'm good. 
    Just as I thought
  • hedonisthedonist standing on the edge of forever Posts: 24,524
    edited June 2020
    i_lov_it said:
    What's with you and your __________ for this young woman? (comment edited by admin. Please review Posting Guidelines.
    Post edited by Kat on
  • i_lov_iti_lov_it Perth, Western Australia Posts: 4,007
    edited June 2020
    hedonist said:
    i_lov_it said:
    What's with you and your __________ for this young woman? (comment edited by admin. Please review Posting Guidelines.
    Wtf???...why would you speak to someone on this forum in that way?...what have I done or said to you to warrant that?...absolutely disgusting comment
    Post edited by Kat on
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,808
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    Darwinspeed, all. 

    Cheers,

    HFD




  • dignindignin Posts: 9,303
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    I'm curious why they still have posting privileges. 
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,808
    dignin said:
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    I'm curious why they still have posting privileges. 
    i would imagine it went unnoticed. 
    Darwinspeed, all. 

    Cheers,

    HFD




  • i_lov_iti_lov_it Perth, Western Australia Posts: 4,007
    dignin said:
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    I'm curious why they still have posting privileges. 
    Antaganostic much? lol
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,808
    i_lov_it said:
    dignin said:
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    I'm curious why they still have posting privileges. 
    Antaganostic much? lol
    it's not antagonistic at all. he is merely pointing out that, based on precedent, a comment like that usually gets someone a time out. sometimes permanent. 
    Darwinspeed, all. 

    Cheers,

    HFD




  • dignindignin Posts: 9,303
    dignin said:
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    I'm curious why they still have posting privileges. 
    i would imagine it went unnoticed. 
    Yeah. I think it's best to ignore such a toxic poster. Absolutely nothing to be gained by it.
  • i_lov_iti_lov_it Perth, Western Australia Posts: 4,007
    i_lov_it said:
    dignin said:
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    I'm curious why they still have posting privileges. 
    Antaganostic much? lol
    it's not antagonistic at all. he is merely pointing out that, based on precedent, a comment like that usually gets someone a time out. sometimes permanent. 
    It's very antaganostic actually...
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 27,739
    i_lov_it said:
    dignin said:
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    I'm curious why they still have posting privileges. 
    Antaganostic much? lol
    Why don’t you like her?  I mean at worst if we take her advice we clean up the planet.  How could any of that be bad?  
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • hedonisthedonist standing on the edge of forever Posts: 24,524
    i_lov_it said:
    hedonist said:
    i_lov_it said:
    What's with you and your hard-on (correction: flaccidity, in this case) for this young woman?
    Wtf???...why would you speak to someone on this forum in that way?...what have I done or said to you to warrant that?...absolutely disgusting comment
    You've never heard the term before?  Ya learn something new every day...

    I can and will reply to anything I so desire.  That's the beauty of a public forum!

    Unfortunately, you seem to have overlooked my inquiry:  What about her being recognized for her achievements makes it a "sad day for humanity"?

    (Should you choose not to reply, I understand.)
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,808
    i_lov_it said:
    i_lov_it said:
    dignin said:
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    I'm curious why they still have posting privileges. 
    Antaganostic much? lol
    it's not antagonistic at all. he is merely pointing out that, based on precedent, a comment like that usually gets someone a time out. sometimes permanent. 
    It's very antaganostic actually...
    you seem to enjoy saying really shitty things about/to people and when someone challenges you, you play the victim. 
    Darwinspeed, all. 

    Cheers,

    HFD




  • i_lov_iti_lov_it Perth, Western Australia Posts: 4,007
    edited December 2019
    hedonist said:
    i_lov_it said:
    hedonist said:
    i_lov_it said:
    What's with you and your hard-on (correction: flaccidity, in this case) for this young woman?
    Wtf???...why would you speak to someone on this forum in that way?...what have I done or said to you to warrant that?...absolutely disgusting comment
    You've never heard the term before?  Ya learn something new every day...

    I can and will reply to anything I so desire.  That's the beauty of a public forum!

    Unfortunately, you seem to have overlooked my inquiry:  What about her being recognized for her achievements makes it a "sad day for humanity"?

    (Should you choose not to reply, I understand.)
    Your choice of words is disgusting to use sexual connotations...
  • mcgruff10 said:
    i_lov_it said:
    dignin said:
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    I'm curious why they still have posting privileges. 
    Antaganostic much? lol
    Why don’t you like her?  I mean at worst if we take her advice we clean up the planet.  How could any of that be bad?  

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • i_lov_it said:
    i_lov_it said:
    dignin said:
    here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one. 
    I'm curious why they still have posting privileges. 
    Antaganostic much? lol
    it's not antagonistic at all. he is merely pointing out that, based on precedent, a comment like that usually gets someone a time out. sometimes permanent. 
    It's very antaganostic actually...
    you seem to enjoy saying really shitty things about/to people and when someone challenges you, you play the victim. 
    Are you talking about Trump?
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
This discussion has been closed.