a 16 year old climate activist as time's person of the year is a "sad day for humanity?". given your "what a fucking whore" comment on AOC, I figured you'd have something a little more disgusting to say about her.
a 16 year old climate activist as time's person of the year is a "sad day for humanity?". given your "what a fucking whore" comment on AOC, I figured you'd have something a little more disgusting to say about her.
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
I'm curious why they still have posting privileges.
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
I'm curious why they still have posting privileges.
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
I'm curious why they still have posting privileges.
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
I'm curious why they still have posting privileges.
Antaganostic much? lol
it's not antagonistic at all. he is merely pointing out that, based on precedent, a comment like that usually gets someone a time out. sometimes permanent.
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
I'm curious why they still have posting privileges.
i would imagine it went unnoticed.
Yeah. I think it's best to ignore such a toxic poster. Absolutely nothing to be gained by it.
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
I'm curious why they still have posting privileges.
Antaganostic much? lol
it's not antagonistic at all. he is merely pointing out that, based on precedent, a comment like that usually gets someone a time out. sometimes permanent.
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
I'm curious why they still have posting privileges.
Antaganostic much? lol
Why don’t you like her? I mean at worst if we take her advice we clean up the planet. How could any of that be bad?
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
0
Options
hedonist
standing on the edge of forever Posts: 24,524
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
I'm curious why they still have posting privileges.
Antaganostic much? lol
it's not antagonistic at all. he is merely pointing out that, based on precedent, a comment like that usually gets someone a time out. sometimes permanent.
It's very antaganostic actually...
you seem to enjoy saying really shitty things about/to people and when someone challenges you, you play the victim.
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
I'm curious why they still have posting privileges.
Antaganostic much? lol
Why don’t you like her? I mean at worst if we take her advice we clean up the planet. How could any of that be bad?
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
here we go again.....getting offended by any question posted to avoid answering. someone who called a female politician of colour "a fucking whore" is offended by someone asking about their obsession with a public figure. the irony is strong with this one.
I'm curious why they still have posting privileges.
Antaganostic much? lol
it's not antagonistic at all. he is merely pointing out that, based on precedent, a comment like that usually gets someone a time out. sometimes permanent.
It's very antaganostic actually...
you seem to enjoy saying really shitty things about/to people and when someone challenges you, you play the victim.
Are you talking about Trump?
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
System
Posts: 13
Comments
Cheers,
HFD
Cheers,
HFD
Cheers,
HFD
Cheers,
HFD
Cheers,
HFD
Cheers,
HFD
I can and will reply to anything I so desire. That's the beauty of a public forum!
Unfortunately, you seem to have overlooked my inquiry: What about her being recognized for her achievements makes it a "sad day for humanity"?
(Should you choose not to reply, I understand.)
Cheers,
HFD