that gronkowski "hit"... 1 game is laughable. it was the dirtiest and most cowardly thing i have seen someone do in pro sports.
Dirtier than Marty McSorley hitting Donald Brashear in the head with his stick? I don't think so.
Hmmm.... And what do McSorley (at the time of the incident) and Gronk have in common, I wonder?
You really should move back to Brooklyn.
It's awful. My daughter has goddamn B's stickers all over her hockey helmet, her mom is a goddamn B's bimbo, and my daughter and her mite teammates are getting three minutes of fame to scrimmage on sloppy TD Garden ice in between periods next week. She's likely hooked after that.
I need to get back to Brooklyn stat so that at least maybe my son won't become a fucking mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging Boston goon and learn classy Rangers traditions such as the "Potvin sucks!" chant, "#om@ Larry!" and interrupting the national anthem with "LET'S GO RANGERS!!!!"
Of course, in NYC, I was running the risk of them becoming Yankees fans. Tough battles that we as parents have to choose.
I'll say this: If either one of them ever even so much as mentions anything to do with the Celtics in a favorable light, they will from thenceforth be disowned.
embrace it, fucker.
bruins, celtics, pats.
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
Watching the Rams game and their brutal lack of urgency on their drive with four minutes remaining was horrible.
What... was... that?
We'll see if they get it back and what they might be able to do with it if they do.
* And I'm not sure why Baldwin didn't secure the first down in the Jax game either- going out of bounds after a nine yard gain when he could have dived forward and gotten the first? There was lots of time. As it turns out... sack on the next play... and... gaaaaame over.
that gronkowski "hit"... 1 game is laughable. it was the dirtiest and most cowardly thing i have seen someone do in pro sports.
Dirtier than Marty McSorley hitting Donald Brashear in the head with his stick? I don't think so.
Hmmm.... And what do McSorley (at the time of the incident) and Gronk have in common, I wonder?
You really should move back to Brooklyn.
It's awful. My daughter has goddamn B's stickers all over her hockey helmet, her mom is a goddamn B's bimbo, and my daughter and her mite teammates are getting three minutes of fame to scrimmage on sloppy TD Garden ice in between periods next week. She's likely hooked after that.
I need to get back to Brooklyn stat so that at least maybe my son won't become a fucking mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging Boston goon and learn classy Rangers traditions such as the "Potvin sucks!" chant, "#om@ Larry!" and interrupting the national anthem with "LET'S GO RANGERS!!!!"
Of course, in NYC, I was running the risk of them becoming Yankees fans. Tough battles that we as parents have to choose.
I'll say this: If either one of them ever even so much as mentions anything to do with the Celtics in a favorable light, they will from thenceforth be disowned.
embrace it, fucker.
bruins, celtics, pats.
Sure, dickhead. Right after you go toss Vin Scully's salad.
That was some bush league nonsense by the Seahawks at the end of that game yesterday. Michael Bennett is a complete piece of trash. But that's pretty much what you should expect from a Pete Carroll team.
I liked thw SNF introductions where weddle said “university of utah, the real ‘U’”
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
So yah... the Pats looked very average to slightly below average last night.
I've never seen so many sideline spazzouts which resulted in no changes.
Their arrogance lost them that game. Miami is a shitty team. I can't help but feel the Pats had the Steelers on their mind and they looked past the Fins.
With that said... they were really soft on defence. And their offence looked like they were playing underwater.
Its a game they can afford to lose. They purposely played soft so as not to tip their hand offensively or defensively to the Steelers, a much more important game with more tangible benefits to winning. Bill treated this game as a practice with pads. Why risk injuries and show your playbook for a meaningless game? They still go 12-4 and make the playoffs if they lose next week. And home field in the playoffs hasn't always been kind to them.
Its a game they can afford to lose. They purposely played soft so as not to tip their hand offensively or defensively to the Steelers, a much more important game with more tangible benefits to winning. Bill treated this game as a practice with pads. Why risk injuries and show your playbook for a meaningless game? They still go 12-4 and make the playoffs if they lose next week. And home field in the playoffs hasn't always been kind to them.
You do realize the Pats are only 1 game up on the Jags? I haven't figured out any tie breakers but if the Pats lose to the Steelers they may lose the bye game now as well. I would say that is something very real to play for.
BTW, Garappolo has a 100% win percentage as a starter this season. Brady has a 77% win percentage. The Pats kept the wrong QB.
Tom Brady & Donald Trump, BFF's Fuckus rules all Rob Seattle
Its a game they can afford to lose. They purposely played soft so as not to tip their hand offensively or defensively to the Steelers, a much more important game with more tangible benefits to winning. Bill treated this game as a practice with pads. Why risk injuries and show your playbook for a meaningless game? They still go 12-4 and make the playoffs if they lose next week. And home field in the playoffs hasn't always been kind to them.
Ahhh so Brady must have been throwing those picks on purpose last night then huh? Funny how some Pats fans can't even entertain the notion that they just got beat.
Its a game they can afford to lose. They purposely played soft so as not to tip their hand offensively or defensively to the Steelers, a much more important game with more tangible benefits to winning. Bill treated this game as a practice with pads. Why risk injuries and show your playbook for a meaningless game? They still go 12-4 and make the playoffs if they lose next week. And home field in the playoffs hasn't always been kind to them.
You do realize the Pats are only 1 game up on the Jags? I haven't figured out any tie breakers but if the Pats lose to the Steelers they may lose the bye game now as well. I would say that is something very real to play for.
BTW, Garappolo has a 100% win percentage as a starter this season. Brady has a 77% win percentage. The Pats kept the wrong QB.
Doesn’t concern me. Playoffs are a completely different set of games/season. Both the bye week and home field don’t do much for them. A combination of complacency and too much rest. Their play calling last night was ultra conservative and they played without a sense of urgency. And they lost by 7. Get totally blown out next week, I might have concerns. You know Bill’s already in Tomlin’s head.
Its a game they can afford to lose. They purposely played soft so as not to tip their hand offensively or defensively to the Steelers, a much more important game with more tangible benefits to winning. Bill treated this game as a practice with pads. Why risk injuries and show your playbook for a meaningless game? They still go 12-4 and make the playoffs if they lose next week. And home field in the playoffs hasn't always been kind to them.
Ahhh so Brady must have been throwing those picks on purpose last night then huh? Funny how SOME Pats fans can't even entertain the notion that they just got beat.
Its a game they can afford to lose. They purposely played soft so as not to tip their hand offensively or defensively to the Steelers, a much more important game with more tangible benefits to winning. Bill treated this game as a practice with pads. Why risk injuries and show your playbook for a meaningless game? They still go 12-4 and make the playoffs if they lose next week. And home field in the playoffs hasn't always been kind to them.
Ahhh so Brady must have been throwing those picks on purpose last night then huh? Funny how SOME Pats fans can't even entertain the notion that they just got beat.
Ummmm not some, ALL.
So Tom had a bad day in a stadium or against a team where he’s traditionally has a bad day. Those two picks were under thrown and pretty awesome defense plays were made as well. I just don’t think the Pats’ game in with a game plan and mindset to win 37-3. They’re saving it for next week. Remind me again what Tom’s TD to INT ratio is again, season and career. I said at the start of the season they’d go 12-4, hardly indicative of not admitting they can be beat or lose.
Its a game they can afford to lose. They purposely played soft so as not to tip their hand offensively or defensively to the Steelers, a much more important game with more tangible benefits to winning. Bill treated this game as a practice with pads. Why risk injuries and show your playbook for a meaningless game? They still go 12-4 and make the playoffs if they lose next week. And home field in the playoffs hasn't always been kind to them.
You do realize the Pats are only 1 game up on the Jags? I haven't figured out any tie breakers but if the Pats lose to the Steelers they may lose the bye game now as well. I would say that is something very real to play for.
BTW, Garappolo has a 100% win percentage as a starter this season. Brady has a 77% win percentage. The Pats kept the wrong QB.
And this would make sense if Garappolo started 13 games but alas, he did not.
Its a game they can afford to lose. They purposely played soft so as not to tip their hand offensively or defensively to the Steelers, a much more important game with more tangible benefits to winning. Bill treated this game as a practice with pads. Why risk injuries and show your playbook for a meaningless game? They still go 12-4 and make the playoffs if they lose next week. And home field in the playoffs hasn't always been kind to them.
Ahhh so Brady must have been throwing those picks on purpose last night then huh? Funny how SOME Pats fans can't even entertain the notion that they just got beat.
Ummmm not some, ALL.
So Tom had a bad day in a stadium or against a team where he’s traditionally has a bad day. Those two picks were under thrown and pretty awesome defense plays were made as well. I just don’t think the Pats’ game in with a game plan and mindset to win 37-3. They’re saving it for next week. Remind me again what Tom’s TD to INT ratio is again, season and career. I said at the start of the season they’d go 12-4, hardly indicative of not admitting they can be beat or lose.
Just feel obligated to point out that Rodgers has a much better TD-INT ratio.
Listen to some of my music here (if you want to):
[url="My soundcloud"]
Its a game they can afford to lose. They purposely played soft so as not to tip their hand offensively or defensively to the Steelers, a much more important game with more tangible benefits to winning. Bill treated this game as a practice with pads. Why risk injuries and show your playbook for a meaningless game? They still go 12-4 and make the playoffs if they lose next week. And home field in the playoffs hasn't always been kind to them.
Ahhh so Brady must have been throwing those picks on purpose last night then huh? Funny how SOME Pats fans can't even entertain the notion that they just got beat.
Ummmm not some, ALL.
So Tom had a bad day in a stadium or against a team where he’s traditionally has a bad day. Those two picks were under thrown and pretty awesome defense plays were made as well. I just don’t think the Pats’ game in with a game plan and mindset to win 37-3. They’re saving it for next week. Remind me again what Tom’s TD to INT ratio is again, season and career. I said at the start of the season they’d go 12-4, hardly indicative of not admitting they can be beat or lose.
Just feel obligated to point out that Rodgers has a much better TD-INT ratio.
Not even close really, 4.13 to 3.06. Hey though, Brady was 1/53rd of 5 super bowl teams!
Comments
embrace it, fucker.
bruins, celtics, pats.
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
8/28/98- Camden, NJ
10/31/09- Philly
5/21/10- NYC
9/2/12- Philly, PA
7/19/13- Wrigley
10/19/13- Brooklyn, NY
10/21/13- Philly, PA
10/22/13- Philly, PA
10/27/13- Baltimore, MD
Tres Mts.- 3/23/11- Philly
Eddie Vedder- 6/25/11- Philly
What... was... that?
We'll see if they get it back and what they might be able to do with it if they do.
* And I'm not sure why Baldwin didn't secure the first down in the Jax game either- going out of bounds after a nine yard gain when he could have dived forward and gotten the first? There was lots of time. As it turns out... sack on the next play... and... gaaaaame over.
They don't get the ball back.
Lesson learned... morons.
The Potvin one now is just Potvin sucks, since that piece of shit wife beater no longer plays.
Fuck the Fishsticks!
http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/news/video-michael-bennett-seahawks-jaguars-fight-ejections-nfl-replay/ed61vao4pbbj1h6erzd8i769q
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
I've never seen so many sideline spazzouts which resulted in no changes.
Their arrogance lost them that game. Miami is a shitty team. I can't help but feel the Pats had the Steelers on their mind and they looked past the Fins.
With that said... they were really soft on defence. And their offence looked like they were playing underwater.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
BTW, Garappolo has a 100% win percentage as a starter this season. Brady has a 77% win percentage. The Pats kept the wrong QB.
Fuckus rules all
Rob
Seattle
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Trieste 14, Vienna 14, Gdynia 14, Leeds 14, Milton Keynes 14, Denver 14
Central Park 15
Fort Lauderdale 16, Miami 16, Tampa 16, Jacksonville 16, Greenville 16, Hampton 16, Columbia 16, Lexington 16, Philly1 16, Philly2 16, NYC1 16, NYC2 16, Quebec City 16, Ottawa 16, Toronto1 16, Toronto2 16, Fenway1 16, Fenway2 16, Wrigley1 16, Wrigley2 16
Fuckus rules all
Rob
Seattle