Trent Reznor/Atticus Ross

Attaway77Attaway77 Posts: 2,848
edited July 2021 in Other Music
Everything these guys put out together is brilliant... Looking forward to hearing more of this new one...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODSZl44vDno

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIBTsUzPrcQ
1998 Dallas (7/5) 2006 San Fran (7/15,7/16) 2009 San Fran (8/28) 2010 Bristow (5/13) NY (5/21) 2011 Alpine Valley (9/3,9/4)
2012 Missoula (9/30) 2013 Chicago (7/19) Pittsburgh (10/11) Buffalo (10/12) Baltimore (10/27) Dallas (11/15)
2014 Austin (10/12) Memphis (10/14) St. Paul (10/19) Milwaukee (10/20) Denver (10/22)
2016 Ft. Lauderdale (4/8) Miami (4/9) Hampton (4/18) Philly (4/28,4/29) NY (5/1,5/2) 2018 Seattle (8/10) Missoula (8/13) 2022 Nashville (9/16)

E.V. - 2008 Berkeley (4/8) 2012 Austin (11/9,11/12)
Temple of the Dog - 2016 Upper Darby



Post edited by Attaway77 on

Comments

  • RoleModelsinBlood31RoleModelsinBlood31 Austin TX Posts: 6,136
    This was on Best Buy for $18.99 for the full 3lp set... it is thought it must have been a pricing mistake because it's far more elsewhere and I'm not sure if they caught it or not.

    check their site for restock but the 18.99 set sold out a few days ago.
    I'm like an opening band for your mom.
  • toolietoolie Posts: 388
    I had the house to myself tonight and cranked this. It's STELLAR. Totally gonna have to pick it up in vinyl. 
  • HesCalledDyerHesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,416
    Wonder why they went with the "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" moniker since Atticus is now a full-time NIN member?
  • RoleModelsinBlood31RoleModelsinBlood31 Austin TX Posts: 6,136
    Got my 3lp set the other day- it's not a gatefold just a heavyish sleeve with three records in nice sleeves.  Sounds awesome, the entire disc 1 sides a/b are pretty much ambient but discs 2/3 are super intense.  Really glad I picked this up because I went against my rule of "no soundtracks" when I got this.  It was too cheap not to though.
    I'm like an opening band for your mom.
  • Wonder why they went with the "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" moniker since Atticus is now a full-time NIN member?
    ?
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • HesCalledDyerHesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,416
    Wonder why they went with the "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" moniker since Atticus is now a full-time NIN member?
    ?
    As in Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are the two official, full-time members of Nine Inch Nails.  Just wondering why they released it under "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" instead of "Nine Inch Nails."  Not a big deal.  Just a curiosity, that's all.

    It'd be like PJ releasing their next album under the name "Ed, Stone, Jeff, Mike, & Matt" instead of "Pearl Jam."
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,474
    edited September 2017
    Wonder why they went with the "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" moniker since Atticus is now a full-time NIN member?
    ?
    As in Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are the two official, full-time members of Nine Inch Nails.  Just wondering why they released it under "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" instead of "Nine Inch Nails."  Not a big deal.  Just a curiosity, that's all.

    It'd be like PJ releasing their next album under the name "Ed, Stone, Jeff, Mike, & Matt" instead of "Pearl Jam."
    I would assume it's because they're still not NIN when it's just the two of them. NIN isn't a two-man band. :)
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • HesCalledDyerHesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,416
    PJ_Soul said:
    Wonder why they went with the "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" moniker since Atticus is now a full-time NIN member?
    ?
    As in Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are the two official, full-time members of Nine Inch Nails.  Just wondering why they released it under "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" instead of "Nine Inch Nails."  Not a big deal.  Just a curiosity, that's all.

    It'd be like PJ releasing their next album under the name "Ed, Stone, Jeff, Mike, & Matt" instead of "Pearl Jam."
    I would assume it's because they're still not NIN when it's just the two of them. NIN isn't a two-man band. :)
    Except they are.  NIN was only Trent until last year, when he added Atticus as a full-time member.
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,474
    PJ_Soul said:
    Wonder why they went with the "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" moniker since Atticus is now a full-time NIN member?
    ?
    As in Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are the two official, full-time members of Nine Inch Nails.  Just wondering why they released it under "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" instead of "Nine Inch Nails."  Not a big deal.  Just a curiosity, that's all.

    It'd be like PJ releasing their next album under the name "Ed, Stone, Jeff, Mike, & Matt" instead of "Pearl Jam."
    I would assume it's because they're still not NIN when it's just the two of them. NIN isn't a two-man band. :)
    Except they are.  NIN was only Trent until last year, when he added Atticus as a full-time member.
    But when you go to a NIN concert there are more than 2 people on stage. Pretty sure NIN has never put on a show or released an album where those two are the only ones playing. Perhaps the "full-time member" status doesn't mean quite as much as you're assuming?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • HesCalledDyerHesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,416
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Wonder why they went with the "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" moniker since Atticus is now a full-time NIN member?
    ?
    As in Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are the two official, full-time members of Nine Inch Nails.  Just wondering why they released it under "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" instead of "Nine Inch Nails."  Not a big deal.  Just a curiosity, that's all.

    It'd be like PJ releasing their next album under the name "Ed, Stone, Jeff, Mike, & Matt" instead of "Pearl Jam."
    I would assume it's because they're still not NIN when it's just the two of them. NIN isn't a two-man band. :)
    Except they are.  NIN was only Trent until last year, when he added Atticus as a full-time member.
    But when you go to a NIN concert there are more than 2 people on stage. Pretty sure NIN has never put on a show or released an album where those two are the only ones playing. Perhaps the "full-time member" status doesn't mean quite as much as you're assuming?
    That's his touring band.  Of course there's more than two on stage.  Trent can't play all the instruments by himself.  When you buy a NIN album, it's all Trent.
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,474
    edited September 2017
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Wonder why they went with the "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" moniker since Atticus is now a full-time NIN member?
    ?
    As in Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are the two official, full-time members of Nine Inch Nails.  Just wondering why they released it under "Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross" instead of "Nine Inch Nails."  Not a big deal.  Just a curiosity, that's all.

    It'd be like PJ releasing their next album under the name "Ed, Stone, Jeff, Mike, & Matt" instead of "Pearl Jam."
    I would assume it's because they're still not NIN when it's just the two of them. NIN isn't a two-man band. :)
    Except they are.  NIN was only Trent until last year, when he added Atticus as a full-time member.
    But when you go to a NIN concert there are more than 2 people on stage. Pretty sure NIN has never put on a show or released an album where those two are the only ones playing. Perhaps the "full-time member" status doesn't mean quite as much as you're assuming?
    That's his touring band.  Of course there's more than two on stage.  Trent can't play all the instruments by himself.  When you buy a NIN album, it's all Trent.
    Oh is it? I thought he had people work with him on the albums as well. If not, well, I guess they didn't call themselves NIN because they wanted the cache of having their actual names attached to a Ken Burns doc. ;) Or he just doesn't think of NIN as a two-man operation in any case. Or it's possible that the soundtrack for this isn't Trent and Atticus collaborating in any way that is similar to NIN. If they are just out in left field for the ST, and it doesn't even sound like NIN, then it would make good sense not to put that label on it.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • ZodZod Posts: 9,945
    i always assumed Trent Reznor was NIN, and various other musicians went on tour or helped make albums, but they always rotated, so it's more like a Trent Reznor solo project as the band lineup changes all the time.
  • Trent Reznor/NIN puts on one hell of a show.

    Thread integrity, I was not aware that Trent and Atticus composed the Vietnam War Soundtrack when I first started watching the documentary. 
  • ComeToTXComeToTX Austin Posts: 7,525
    Great doc. Great score. Great soundtrack. 
    This show, another show, a show here and a show there.
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,474
    Zod said:
    i always assumed Trent Reznor was NIN, and various other musicians went on tour or helped make albums, but they always rotated, so it's more like a Trent Reznor solo project as the band lineup changes all the time.
    I always assumed that NIN wasn't NIN unless it was specifically meant to be, with other people playing with him. I always thought of Trent on his own as going solo. I mean, he has often done solo work, and he's never once called himself NIN.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • ZodZod Posts: 9,945
    I'm trying to watch this documentary.  It seems really well done and obviously the background music is great, but it's so long.  At first I thought 10 episodes.. that seems doable.  Then the first ep is 1 hour 20 minutes... pretty long.

    I'm finally up to episode 3 and it's almost a 2 hour long episode.

    It almost has too much detail.  I'm having a hard time paying attention....
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,474
    Zod said:
    I'm trying to watch this documentary.  It seems really well done and obviously the background music is great, but it's so long.  At first I thought 10 episodes.. that seems doable.  Then the first ep is 1 hour 20 minutes... pretty long.

    I'm finally up to episode 3 and it's almost a 2 hour long episode.

    It almost has too much detail.  I'm having a hard time paying attention....
    Maybe just do one a week or something?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • RoleModelsinBlood31RoleModelsinBlood31 Austin TX Posts: 6,136
    Zod said:
    I'm trying to watch this documentary.  It seems really well done and obviously the background music is great, but it's so long.  At first I thought 10 episodes.. that seems doable.  Then the first ep is 1 hour 20 minutes... pretty long.

    I'm finally up to episode 3 and it's almost a 2 hour long episode.

    It almost has too much detail.  I'm having a hard time paying attention....
    Super hard once you've had a few drinks and a few bowls too
    I'm like an opening band for your mom.
  • RobbyD462RobbyD462 Victoria BC Posts: 4,768
    Zod said:
    I'm trying to watch this documentary.  It seems really well done and obviously the background music is great, but it's so long.  At first I thought 10 episodes.. that seems doable.  Then the first ep is 1 hour 20 minutes... pretty long.

    I'm finally up to episode 3 and it's almost a 2 hour long episode.

    It almost has too much detail.  I'm having a hard time paying attention....
    I’m at the same spot.
    Home sick so I’ve been trying to learn stuff
    -Seattle,Wash-Key Arena-9/21/9 -Vancouver,B.C-Rogers Arena-12/4/13
    -Seattle,Wash-Key Arena-9/22/9 -Pemberton,B.C-7/17/16
    -Vancouver,B.C-GM Place -9/25/9 -Seattle,Wash-Safeco Field-8/8/18
    -Vancouver,B.C-Pacific Coliseum-9/25/11 -Seattle,Wash-Safeco Field-8/10/18
    -Misoula,MT-Adams Field House-9/30/12

  • Dr. DelightDr. Delight Posts: 11,210
    Allegedly being released tomorrow

    And so you see, I have come to doubt
    All that I once held as true
    I stand alone without beliefs
    The only truth I know is you.
  • Dr. DelightDr. Delight Posts: 11,210
    And so you see, I have come to doubt
    All that I once held as true
    I stand alone without beliefs
    The only truth I know is you.
  • Attaway77Attaway77 Posts: 2,848
    edited October 2017
    Maybe they'll do the whole soundtrack for the new one coming out with Jamie Lee Curtis coming back.
    Post edited by Attaway77 on
    1998 Dallas (7/5) 2006 San Fran (7/15,7/16) 2009 San Fran (8/28) 2010 Bristow (5/13) NY (5/21) 2011 Alpine Valley (9/3,9/4)
    2012 Missoula (9/30) 2013 Chicago (7/19) Pittsburgh (10/11) Buffalo (10/12) Baltimore (10/27) Dallas (11/15)
    2014 Austin (10/12) Memphis (10/14) St. Paul (10/19) Milwaukee (10/20) Denver (10/22)
    2016 Ft. Lauderdale (4/8) Miami (4/9) Hampton (4/18) Philly (4/28,4/29) NY (5/1,5/2) 2018 Seattle (8/10) Missoula (8/13) 2022 Nashville (9/16)

    E.V. - 2008 Berkeley (4/8) 2012 Austin (11/9,11/12)
    Temple of the Dog - 2016 Upper Darby



  • Dr. DelightDr. Delight Posts: 11,210
    Attaway77 said:
    Maybe they'll do the whole soundtrack for the new one coming out with Jamie Lee Curtis coming back.
    Carpenter confirmed a couple days ago  that he is doing the full soundtrack.
    And so you see, I have come to doubt
    All that I once held as true
    I stand alone without beliefs
    The only truth I know is you.
  • Attaway77Attaway77 Posts: 2,848
    I'm looking forward to Halsey next month. I dig her "Badlands" album, Reznor and Ross produced her new album coming, should be interesting...  


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM7luZ-00RI
    1998 Dallas (7/5) 2006 San Fran (7/15,7/16) 2009 San Fran (8/28) 2010 Bristow (5/13) NY (5/21) 2011 Alpine Valley (9/3,9/4)
    2012 Missoula (9/30) 2013 Chicago (7/19) Pittsburgh (10/11) Buffalo (10/12) Baltimore (10/27) Dallas (11/15)
    2014 Austin (10/12) Memphis (10/14) St. Paul (10/19) Milwaukee (10/20) Denver (10/22)
    2016 Ft. Lauderdale (4/8) Miami (4/9) Hampton (4/18) Philly (4/28,4/29) NY (5/1,5/2) 2018 Seattle (8/10) Missoula (8/13) 2022 Nashville (9/16)

    E.V. - 2008 Berkeley (4/8) 2012 Austin (11/9,11/12)
    Temple of the Dog - 2016 Upper Darby



  • Attaway77Attaway77 Posts: 2,848
    1998 Dallas (7/5) 2006 San Fran (7/15,7/16) 2009 San Fran (8/28) 2010 Bristow (5/13) NY (5/21) 2011 Alpine Valley (9/3,9/4)
    2012 Missoula (9/30) 2013 Chicago (7/19) Pittsburgh (10/11) Buffalo (10/12) Baltimore (10/27) Dallas (11/15)
    2014 Austin (10/12) Memphis (10/14) St. Paul (10/19) Milwaukee (10/20) Denver (10/22)
    2016 Ft. Lauderdale (4/8) Miami (4/9) Hampton (4/18) Philly (4/28,4/29) NY (5/1,5/2) 2018 Seattle (8/10) Missoula (8/13) 2022 Nashville (9/16)

    E.V. - 2008 Berkeley (4/8) 2012 Austin (11/9,11/12)
    Temple of the Dog - 2016 Upper Darby



  • Attaway77Attaway77 Posts: 2,848
    edited August 2021
    yep...... Halsey new album sounds great. TR/AR bring it once again, kudos to Halsey for seeking out the mad scientist of music.... 


    https://www.kerrang.com/the-news/halsey-talks-working-with-nine-inch-nails-making-weird-choices-and-taking-risks/


    Post edited by Attaway77 on
    1998 Dallas (7/5) 2006 San Fran (7/15,7/16) 2009 San Fran (8/28) 2010 Bristow (5/13) NY (5/21) 2011 Alpine Valley (9/3,9/4)
    2012 Missoula (9/30) 2013 Chicago (7/19) Pittsburgh (10/11) Buffalo (10/12) Baltimore (10/27) Dallas (11/15)
    2014 Austin (10/12) Memphis (10/14) St. Paul (10/19) Milwaukee (10/20) Denver (10/22)
    2016 Ft. Lauderdale (4/8) Miami (4/9) Hampton (4/18) Philly (4/28,4/29) NY (5/1,5/2) 2018 Seattle (8/10) Missoula (8/13) 2022 Nashville (9/16)

    E.V. - 2008 Berkeley (4/8) 2012 Austin (11/9,11/12)
    Temple of the Dog - 2016 Upper Darby



  • Shot in IMAX?

    THE MTV GENERATION RACE FOR THE MOST EXPENSIVE MUSIC VIDEO HAS STARTED AGAIN. GUNS N ROSES, WILL SMITH, MICHAEL JACKSON - WHERE YA AT!??!?!
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • 1STmammal2wearPants1STmammal2wearPants Worcester, MA Posts: 2,825
    It's amazing what his output has been since 2005. I remember being in college when In Teeth came out, and it being so exciting since it had been since the late 90s since Trent had put anything out. Seems sober and happy now, and it shows in the music, and what's he's done since between NIN and these amazing soundtracks. Dude has reinvented himself with this.
    2003 Mansfield III 
    2004 Boston I 
    2006 Boston I 
    2008 Bonnaroo, Hartford, Mansfield I 
    2010 Hartford 
    2013 Worcester I, Worcester II, Hartford 
    2016 Bonnaroo, Boston I, Boston II 
    2018 Boston I, Boston II 
    2021 Sea.Hear.Now
    2022 Camden
    2024 Boston I, Boston II
  • DC29940DC29940 Tucson, AZ Posts: 630
    Attaway77 said:
    yep...... Halsey new album sounds great. TR/AR bring it once again, kudos to Halsey for seeking out the mad scientist of music.... 


    https://www.kerrang.com/the-news/halsey-talks-working-with-nine-inch-nails-making-weird-choices-and-taking-risks/


    I honestly think I had never heard a Halsey song before this past weekend when I decided to check out IICHLIWP based on Trent and Atticus producing. Wow, really great album and they did a great job with it. It's pretty much been on repeat since my first listen. Well worth checking out.
    Kansas City 7.03.98
    St. Louis 10.11.00
    Kansas City 10.12.00
    St. Louis 4.22.03
    Kansas City 6.12.03
    St. Louis 10.5.04
    Kansas City 5.3.10
    Phoenix (EV) 11.4.12
    Phoenix 11.19.13
    Wrigley 1 8.20.16
    Seattle 1 8.8.18
    Phoenix 4.11.20
    Phoenix 5.9.22
    Indianapolis 9.10.23
    Indianapolis 8.26.24
  • HesCalledDyerHesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,416
    Shot in IMAX?

    THE MTV GENERATION RACE FOR THE MOST EXPENSIVE MUSIC VIDEO HAS STARTED AGAIN. GUNS N ROSES, WILL SMITH, MICHAEL JACKSON - WHERE YA AT!??!?!
    Don't forget Lenny Kravitz!
Sign In or Register to comment.