Options

***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

13637394142315

Comments

  • Options
    Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 36,580
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?

  • Options
    Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 36,580
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oprah.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 36,580
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    PJfanwillneverleave1PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited June 2017
    ^^^

    Another sensational headline. Hey look everyone these people are thinking about running!  Well fuck it I should too then since it is that easy.  Yes, I am thinking about running now.

  • Options
    CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via Chicago Posts: 6,793
    Russia 'won' the electoral college by 77,744 votes in WI, MI, & PA. That is 0.27% of the population of those states. People are acting like that would be some insurmountable task. How is tRump's approval rating doing again? 
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18 IT 07/05/2020 AT 07/07/2020
  • Options
    PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,515
    edited June 2017
    2018
    It's more about voter turnout, and the lower it is, the greater benefit to Republicans. Anyone have a number on the voter turnout in Georgia yesterday?
    Thousands and thousands were supposedly prevented from voting, or so reports said while the polls were still open. Some were saying it was outright voter suppression in favour of the Reps. I haven't read too much about it though, so can't comment on the validity of the claims. Something about obscure country lines, so who knows (well, someone probably does, but not me, lol).
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Options
    CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via Chicago Posts: 6,793
    I still hate the new quote system. 

    Google crosscheck. That will find its way to the supreme court soon I hope. 
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18 IT 07/05/2020 AT 07/07/2020
  • Options
    PJfanwillneverleave1PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited June 2017
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.

    You're so tired of the impeachment stuff already you want to fast forward 4 years. Sorry man. Dude's only been in office for 5 months.


    I somehow missed this comment.
    President Trump has been cemented w/ almost 2yrs of campaigning into the position he has.  It will take nearly double to uncement this.


  • Options
    slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,749
    "THE FIELD"
    ^^^
    I am saying that in a year from now yourself and many others will say "it's only been a year wait and see".  In the meantime unless you put up a candidate that will beat President Trump you will essentially hand the win over in a nicely wrapped present.

    I nominate this warm jar of mayonnaise. All hail President Hellmans!
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • Options
    josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 28,283
    2018

    DHS officials: 21 states potentially targeted by Russia hackers pre-election

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/21/politics/russia-hacking-hearing-states-targeted/index.html

    lol he won't even acknowledge it he probably believes there's nothing wrong with what happened in the elections ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Options
    unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    unsung said:
    unsung said:
    Hmmm, these midterm special elections are not working out so well for the Dems, are they?

    Maybe people are just tired of the act.


    Hi! Welcome to the impeachment thread!


    Also, there is a difference between mid term election and special election. One is not the same as the other.


    Any thoughts on when you think the president will be impeached or when he will resign?


    Thanks for stopping by.

    No idea and don't care.  The last ten should have been removed.

    Seems to me a self professed libertarian would care if his president is overstepping his bounds or not.  Thanks for proving to us again that you're a fake libertarian.



    Try to read again...the last ten should have been removed.

    Your opinion of me means nothing since you weren't here claiming the same.  I won't lose sleep over another President abusing the office when you were asleep when the last guy drone striked a US citizen without trial.
  • Options
    cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,086
    2018
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Options
    Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 36,580
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    C'mon, it's CNN's list. My guess is it'll be someone not currently on it. And smokin' Joe Biden would clean Trump's clock but he likely won't run.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 36,580
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    OnWis97OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 4,822
    "THE FIELD"
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
  • Options
    Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 8,610
    OnWis97 said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    Sanders would've pretty easily beat trump. I don't know why you think he wouldn't have. 

  • Options
    cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,086
    2018
    OnWis97 said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    Sanders would've pretty easily beat trump. I don't know why you think he wouldn't have. 

    How do you figure? Would he have stolen votes from trump? Or do you think people stayed home instead of going to the polls for Hillary?

    csuse I don't think he takes many of any votes from trump. So if there are lots of people that stayed home then this last election is on them.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Options
    Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 8,610
    OnWis97 said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    Sanders would've pretty easily beat trump. I don't know why you think he wouldn't have. 

    How do you figure? Would he have stolen votes from trump? Or do you think people stayed home instead of going to the polls for Hillary?

    csuse I don't think he takes many of any votes from trump. So if there are lots of people that stayed home then this last election is on them.
    Because he was up by 10 to 12 points on trump consistently in the polls. Turnout would've been higher for him. He would've taken all of Jill Stien's votes and some of Johnson's. He would've easily taken all of the Midwest except Indiana, and gotten the rest of Clinton's states. 
  • Options
    cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,086
    2018
    OnWis97 said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    Sanders would've pretty easily beat trump. I don't know why you think he wouldn't have. 

    How do you figure? Would he have stolen votes from trump? Or do you think people stayed home instead of going to the polls for Hillary?

    csuse I don't think he takes many of any votes from trump. So if there are lots of people that stayed home then this last election is on them.
    Because he was up by 10 to 12 points on trump consistently in the polls. Turnout would've been higher for him. He would've taken all of Jill Stien's votes and some of Johnson's. He would've easily taken all of the Midwest except Indiana, and gotten the rest of Clinton's states. 
    I don't think there was anything easy about him being elected.  Could have happened...but certainly not definite.  Heck - I voted for Hillary (to vote against trump)...and if Bernie was running I would have voted for Gary Johnson.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Options
    Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 8,610
    OnWis97 said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    Sanders would've pretty easily beat trump. I don't know why you think he wouldn't have. 

    How do you figure? Would he have stolen votes from trump? Or do you think people stayed home instead of going to the polls for Hillary?

    csuse I don't think he takes many of any votes from trump. So if there are lots of people that stayed home then this last election is on them.
    Because he was up by 10 to 12 points on trump consistently in the polls. Turnout would've been higher for him. He would've taken all of Jill Stien's votes and some of Johnson's. He would've easily taken all of the Midwest except Indiana, and gotten the rest of Clinton's states. 
    I don't think there was anything easy about him being elected.  Could have happened...but certainly not definite.  Heck - I voted for Hillary (to vote against trump)...and if Bernie was running I would have voted for Gary Johnson.
    Of course it's not 100% definite, but I'm not going to pick Chaminade to beat North Carolina in the tourney, either. 

  • Options
    OnWis97OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 4,822
    "THE FIELD"
    OnWis97 said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    Sanders would've pretty easily beat trump. I don't know why you think he wouldn't have. 

    How do you figure? Would he have stolen votes from trump? Or do you think people stayed home instead of going to the polls for Hillary?

    csuse I don't think he takes many of any votes from trump. So if there are lots of people that stayed home then this last election is on them.
    I don't think he would have.  But it is possible.  I think the election was to a degree a reflection of how hated Hilary was for 25 years.  It was an arrogant and stupid move by the party to think it was her chance and that Trump did not stand a chance.

    Would Sanders have stolen votes from Trump?  Probably not.  Would anti-Trump turnout have increased to the point of turning it?  I tend to doubt it, but maybe.  Ultimately he was viewed as "too liberal," not to mention Jewish.  I think the lost votes for that would have made up for the turnout votes.  But who knows?

    As to 2020, the Democrats don't have a deep bench and I'm not seeing a viable candidate.  Trump is, at least by default, probably not going to be beatable.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
  • Options
    Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,598
    OnWis97 said:
    OnWis97 said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    Sanders would've pretty easily beat trump. I don't know why you think he wouldn't have. 

    How do you figure? Would he have stolen votes from trump? Or do you think people stayed home instead of going to the polls for Hillary?

    csuse I don't think he takes many of any votes from trump. So if there are lots of people that stayed home then this last election is on them.
    I don't think he would have.  But it is possible.  I think the election was to a degree a reflection of how hated Hilary was for 25 years.  It was an arrogant and stupid move by the party to think it was her chance and that Trump did not stand a chance.

    Would Sanders have stolen votes from Trump?  Probably not.  Would anti-Trump turnout have increased to the point of turning it?  I tend to doubt it, but maybe.  Ultimately he was viewed as "too liberal," not to mention Jewish.  I think the lost votes for that would have made up for the turnout votes.  But who knows?

    As to 2020, the Democrats don't have a deep bench and I'm not seeing a viable candidate.  Trump is, at least by default, probably not going to be beatable.
    Who saw Obama coming in 2005? No one knew who he was before the convention speech.
  • Options
    Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 8,610
    OnWis97 said:
    OnWis97 said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    Sanders would've pretty easily beat trump. I don't know why you think he wouldn't have. 

    How do you figure? Would he have stolen votes from trump? Or do you think people stayed home instead of going to the polls for Hillary?

    csuse I don't think he takes many of any votes from trump. So if there are lots of people that stayed home then this last election is on them.
    I don't think he would have.  But it is possible.  I think the election was to a degree a reflection of how hated Hilary was for 25 years.  It was an arrogant and stupid move by the party to think it was her chance and that Trump did not stand a chance.

    Would Sanders have stolen votes from Trump?  Probably not.  Would anti-Trump turnout have increased to the point of turning it?  I tend to doubt it, but maybe.  Ultimately he was viewed as "too liberal," not to mention Jewish.  I think the lost votes for that would have made up for the turnout votes.  But who knows?

    As to 2020, the Democrats don't have a deep bench and I'm not seeing a viable candidate.  Trump is, at least by default, probably not going to be beatable.
    Then why do you think Sanders had such a big lead on trump in any head to head poll with trump?
  • Options
    cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,086
    2018
    OnWis97 said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    Sanders would've pretty easily beat trump. I don't know why you think he wouldn't have. 

    How do you figure? Would he have stolen votes from trump? Or do you think people stayed home instead of going to the polls for Hillary?

    csuse I don't think he takes many of any votes from trump. So if there are lots of people that stayed home then this last election is on them.
    Because he was up by 10 to 12 points on trump consistently in the polls. Turnout would've been higher for him. He would've taken all of Jill Stien's votes and some of Johnson's. He would've easily taken all of the Midwest except Indiana, and gotten the rest of Clinton's states. 
    I don't think there was anything easy about him being elected.  Could have happened...but certainly not definite.  Heck - I voted for Hillary (to vote against trump)...and if Bernie was running I would have voted for Gary Johnson.
    Of course it's not 100% definite, but I'm not going to pick Chaminade to beat North Carolina in the tourney, either. 

    Dude - Bernie v Trump is more like a NCAA play-in game .... so tell me who you got?  New Orleans or Mt St Mary's?
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Options
    PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,515
    edited June 2017
    2018
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    I'm not even American, and I LOVE Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. If I were American, I'd be campaigning for either one of them. Two absolutely fantastic options for the leadership IMO. I think both are capable of drumming up enough support to win an election. They are both very inspiring people when they speak for their causes. Groundswell. Plus, they actually truly give a shit and want to do the right thing for the country/citizens. That is extremely rare for politics, and now there are two of them at the same time. It's actually a bit stunning to me. I actually wish they were Canadian, lol, but I guess the USA needs them more.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Options
    cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,086
    2018
    PJ_Soul said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    I'm not even American, and I LOVE Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. If I were American, I'd be campaigning for either one of them. Two absolutely fantastic options for the leadership IMO. I think both are capable of drumming up enough support to win an election. They are both very inspiring people when they speak for their causes. Groundswell. Plus, they actually truly give a shit and want to do the right thing for the country/citizens. That is extremely rare for politics, and now there are two of them at the same time. It's actually a bit stunning to me. I actually wish they were Canadian, lol, but I guess the USA needs them more.
    I wish they were Canadian too.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Options
    Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 8,610
    OnWis97 said:
    ^^^

    I know that.  It won't work again though.  There is not even a whisper of who will be the next Democrat to take on President Trump.  W/out that whisper somewhere shows that the party is in shambles and will throw up an "Anything but Trump candidate" not a real viable for change candidate.


    Do you have the Google Machine in Canada? That was so hard:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/311436-top-15-democratic-presidential-candidates-in-2020


    Oprah Winfrey is on the list?  You guys are in trouble.

    I didn't make the list. The information you seek is out there. Like the truth.
    You didn't make the list but you post it like it is the official list. Once you read it further it is all speculation. That article might as well have had 100 people listed and would have the same effect - zero. 
    If your list is so official who do you support from it?


    Oh look, another list:

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/2020-democrats-donald-trump/

    That's a depressing list.  No wonder we ended up with this idiot president.  To be fair, I'm not really a fan of any politician these days so I'm probably being overly critical.  But Bernie Sanders?  Elizabeth Warren?  This is how the democrats think they win the presidency back?  Really?  Haven't they been paying attention?
    Yep.  Not a single one of them can beat Trump.  Biden if he were younger.  Otherwise, forget it.  That election is already over.
    Sanders would've pretty easily beat trump. I don't know why you think he wouldn't have. 

    How do you figure? Would he have stolen votes from trump? Or do you think people stayed home instead of going to the polls for Hillary?

    csuse I don't think he takes many of any votes from trump. So if there are lots of people that stayed home then this last election is on them.
    Because he was up by 10 to 12 points on trump consistently in the polls. Turnout would've been higher for him. He would've taken all of Jill Stien's votes and some of Johnson's. He would've easily taken all of the Midwest except Indiana, and gotten the rest of Clinton's states. 
    I don't think there was anything easy about him being elected.  Could have happened...but certainly not definite.  Heck - I voted for Hillary (to vote against trump)...and if Bernie was running I would have voted for Gary Johnson.
    Of course it's not 100% definite, but I'm not going to pick Chaminade to beat North Carolina in the tourney, either. 

    Dude - Bernie v Trump is more like a NCAA play-in game .... so tell me who you got?  New Orleans or Mt St Mary's?
    No way. Bernie's old school game is an easy win, even with the scoop shots and underhand free throws. Squecky clean, too. No ncaa violations, unlike trump's  history of giving recruits coke, strippers, and all A's without going to class. 
    l
  • Options
    cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,086
    2018
    cincybearcat said:Dude - Bernie v Trump is more like a NCAA play-in game .... so tell me who you got?  New Orleans or Mt St Mary's?
    No way. Bernie's old school game is an easy win, even with the scoop shots and underhand free throws. Squecky clean, too. No ncaa violations, unlike trump's  history of giving recruits coke, strippers, and all A's without going to class. 
    l
    Yeah, when was the last time a squeky team beat the team that provided hookers and A's?

    Anyhow - no matter who ends up running against Trump, I'll have to think very long and hard before not voting for them.  Time to register as a D so I can participate in the primary!
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Options
    Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 8,610
    cincybearcat said:Dude - Bernie v Trump is more like a NCAA play-in game .... so tell me who you got?  New Orleans or Mt St Mary's?
    No way. Bernie's old school game is an easy win, even with the scoop shots and underhand free throws. Squecky clean, too. No ncaa violations, unlike trump's  history of giving recruits coke, strippers, and all A's without going to class. 
    l
    Yeah, when was the last time a squeky team beat the team that provided hookers and A's?

    Anyhow - no matter who ends up running against Trump, I'll have to think very long and hard before not voting for them.  Time to register as a D so I can participate in the primary!
    Just like title victories, presidential wins can be vacated after the fact. 
Sign In or Register to comment.