Russia to decriminalise domestic violence

dimitrispearljam

wtf...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-decriminalise-domestic-violence-vladimir-putin-ultra-conservative-family-laws-a7541371.html

catefrances

surprise surprise surprise.... dudes think having a penis and balls is the be all and end all, yet human testicles are so fragile that the term 'grow some balls' is meaningless to everyone except those with balls... why is that?

vaggar99

pu$$y grabbing has been legal for decades

josevolution

Bafoon's best friend !

catefrances

vaggar99 said:

pu$$y grabbing has been legal for decades

legal in the sense that pathetic weak minded males think its their right... which when you come down to it, isnt legal at all, just pathetic.

dimitrispearljam

vaggar99 said:

pu$$y grabbing has been legal for decades

"legal" doesnt mean its "morale" too
i know why u post this but i just want to comment thats thre are not enough laws that cover the right or morale part of things
and do we need laws for that?/shit...men should not do it,cos it s a fuckin shitty thing to do,,they dont have the right to do it

josevolution

dimitrispearljam said:

vaggar99 said:

pu$$y grabbing has been legal for decades

"legal" doesnt mean its "morale" too
i know why u post this but i just want to comment thats thre are not enough laws that cover the right or morale part of things
and do we need laws for that?/shit...men should not do it,cos it s a fuckin shitty thing to do,,they dont have the right to do it

And now we have the leader of the free world who believes it's ok to just grab without asking as long as you're a star !

catefrances

dimitrispearljam said:

vaggar99 said:

pu$$y grabbing has been legal for decades

"legal" doesnt mean its "morale" too
i know why u post this but i just want to comment thats thre are not enough laws that cover the right or morale part of things
and do we need laws for that?/shit...men should not do it,cos it s a fuckin shitty thing to do,,they dont have the right to do it

you mean MORAL... MORALE means something different.

dimitrispearljam

catefrances said:

dimitrispearljam said:

vaggar99 said:

pu$$y grabbing has been legal for decades

"legal" doesnt mean its "morale" too
i know why u post this but i just want to comment thats thre are not enough laws that cover the right or morale part of things
and do we need laws for that?/shit...men should not do it,cos it s a fuckin shitty thing to do,,they dont have the right to do it

you mean MORAL... MORALE means something different.

yes sorry!!fuck my shitty english

RoleModelsinBlood31

Make me that borscht, b***h!

Kidding, bad joke, sorry

Bentleyspop

dimitrispearljam said:

catefrances said:

dimitrispearljam said:

vaggar99 said:

pu$$y grabbing has been legal for decades

"legal" doesnt mean its "morale" too
i know why u post this but i just want to comment thats thre are not enough laws that cover the right or morale part of things
and do we need laws for that?/shit...men should not do it,cos it s a fuckin shitty thing to do,,they dont have the right to do it

you mean MORAL... MORALE means something different.

yes sorry!!fuck my shitty english

You're on an American site for an American band you damn well better speak 'murican on here or go back where you came from

Thirty Bills Unpaid

Bentleyspop said:

dimitrispearljam said:

catefrances said:

dimitrispearljam said:

vaggar99 said:

pu$$y grabbing has been legal for decades

"legal" doesnt mean its "morale" too
i know why u post this but i just want to comment thats thre are not enough laws that cover the right or morale part of things
and do we need laws for that?/shit...men should not do it,cos it s a fuckin shitty thing to do,,they dont have the right to do it

you mean MORAL... MORALE means something different.

yes sorry!!fuck my shitty english

You're on an American site for an American band you damn well better speak 'murican on here or go back where you came from

It's guys like Dimi that cost Trump the popular vote.

dimitrispearljam

Bentleyspop said:

dimitrispearljam said:

catefrances said:

dimitrispearljam said:

vaggar99 said:

pu$$y grabbing has been legal for decades

"legal" doesnt mean its "morale" too
i know why u post this but i just want to comment thats thre are not enough laws that cover the right or morale part of things
and do we need laws for that?/shit...men should not do it,cos it s a fuckin shitty thing to do,,they dont have the right to do it

you mean MORAL... MORALE means something different.

yes sorry!!fuck my shitty english

You're on an American site for an American band you damn well better speak 'murican on here or go back where you came from

ok,,ill go bigly next time!!

Jason P

I can't believe such a civil country would propose such a thing. I guess after delivering peace and joy in Syria, they now have to focus on other more pressing matters.

HughFreakingDillon

good god. the whole fucking world is going mad.

HesCalledDyer

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

PJPOWER

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

HughFreakingDillon

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

if you are pro-life, then you are against the main message of the movement. it has nothing to do with being "enough of a woman".

PJPOWER

HughFreakingDillon said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

if you are pro-life, then you are against the main message of the movement. it has nothing to do with being "enough of a woman".

Fair enough, although it probably should have been sold as a pro-choice movement instead of a "women's rights" movement. I know many that were confused. Seemed as if women were being categorized based on their abortion stance...which is actually very offensive to many women.

jeffbr

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

It is possible to be anti-abortion and still be pro-freedom to allow women to decide what is best for their bodies and lives. Not everyone who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. They are simply proponents of self-determination. So if the women you know are opposed to allowing individuals to decide reproductive matters for themselves and would rather have that dictated to them by old, white men, then they probably wouldn't fit in with the majority of the marchers.

josevolution

PJPOWER said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

if you are pro-life, then you are against the main message of the movement. it has nothing to do with being "enough of a woman".

Fair enough, although it probably should have been sold as a pro-choice movement instead of a "women's rights" movement. I know many that were confused. Seemed as if women were being categorized based on their abortion stance...which is actually very offensive to many women.

Yeah but the 500 k that showed up to march is not enough of a message again the message is , don't trample women's reproductive rights !

RoleModelsinBlood31

Yeah this is just absurd, is this even real?

PJ_Soul

jeffbr said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

It is possible to be anti-abortion and still be pro-freedom to allow women to decide what is best for their bodies and lives. Not everyone who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. They are simply proponents of self-determination. So if the women you know are opposed to allowing individuals to decide reproductive matters for themselves and would rather have that dictated to them by old, white men, then they probably wouldn't fit in with the majority of the marchers.

Nobody is "pro-abortion".

jeffbr

PJ_Soul said:

jeffbr said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

It is possible to be anti-abortion and still be pro-freedom to allow women to decide what is best for their bodies and lives. Not everyone who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. They are simply proponents of self-determination. So if the women you know are opposed to allowing individuals to decide reproductive matters for themselves and would rather have that dictated to them by old, white men, then they probably wouldn't fit in with the majority of the marchers.

Nobody is "pro-abortion".

Nobody? I'm pretty sure you got my point, but if you want to argue, we can talk about the meaning of absolutes.

Bentleyspop

PJ_Soul said:

jeffbr said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

It is possible to be anti-abortion and still be pro-freedom to allow women to decide what is best for their bodies and lives. Not everyone who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. They are simply proponents of self-determination. So if the women you know are opposed to allowing individuals to decide reproductive matters for themselves and would rather have that dictated to them by old, white men, then they probably wouldn't fit in with the majority of the marchers.

Nobody is "pro-abortion".

Exactly!!
What they are is pro-choice
What they are is about letting a woman decide what is right for her and her body.
Not letting a man or a church or a government decide.

PJPOWER

jeffbr said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

It is possible to be anti-abortion and still be pro-freedom to allow women to decide what is best for their bodies and lives. Not everyone who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. They are simply proponents of self-determination. So if the women you know are opposed to allowing individuals to decide reproductive matters for themselves and would rather have that dictated to them by old, white men, then they probably wouldn't fit in with the majority of the marchers.

So is it possible for a woman to believe that abortion=murder and to be against abortion because they are against murder? It's not a woman rights issue, it is a moral issue to them...just like murder is... Anyways, we should probably continue this debate in the appropriate thread before the forum hall monitors jump on our asses!

dignin

jeffbr said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

It is possible to be anti-abortion and still be pro-freedom to allow women to decide what is best for their bodies and lives. Not everyone who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. They are simply proponents of self-determination. So if the women you know are opposed to allowing individuals to decide reproductive matters for themselves and would rather have that dictated to them by old, white men, then they probably wouldn't fit in with the majority of the marchers.

Great explanation.

Go Beavers

PJPOWER said:

jeffbr said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

It is possible to be anti-abortion and still be pro-freedom to allow women to decide what is best for their bodies and lives. Not everyone who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. They are simply proponents of self-determination. So if the women you know are opposed to allowing individuals to decide reproductive matters for themselves and would rather have that dictated to them by old, white men, then they probably wouldn't fit in with the majority of the marchers.

So is it possible for a woman to believe that abortion=murder and to be against abortion because they are against murder? It's not a woman rights issue, it is a moral issue to them...just like murder is... Anyways, we should probably continue this debate in the appropriate thread before the forum hall monitors jump on our asses!

And sadly a lot of anti-choice women voted for trump. I know several and they believe they made the decision to vote for trump for the greater good. Pretty ridiculous if you ask me. trump is the furthest thing from good that I can think of.

PJPOWER

Go Beavers said:

PJPOWER said:

jeffbr said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

It is possible to be anti-abortion and still be pro-freedom to allow women to decide what is best for their bodies and lives. Not everyone who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. They are simply proponents of self-determination. So if the women you know are opposed to allowing individuals to decide reproductive matters for themselves and would rather have that dictated to them by old, white men, then they probably wouldn't fit in with the majority of the marchers.

So is it possible for a woman to believe that abortion=murder and to be against abortion because they are against murder? It's not a woman rights issue, it is a moral issue to them...just like murder is... Anyways, we should probably continue this debate in the appropriate thread before the forum hall monitors jump on our asses!

And sadly a lot of anti-choice women voted for trump. I know several and they believe they made the decision to vote for trump for the greater good. Pretty ridiculous if you ask me. trump is the furthest thing from good that I can think of.

Exactly! I think you're starting to get my point! All women have different opinions on a number of things and I would be willing to say all have been objectified in some way or another. Regarding women as lesser "woman" because they are pro life distances many of those potential voters from supporting a "pro woman" party or platform. It should have been labeled a "pro choice" or "anti-religion" march...because that is more in line with the message. Otherwise the message should have been that all women are invited and should be heard an treated with respect...more in line with "I am woman, hear me" instead of "I am woman=I am pro choice" because the latter is not really an accurate portrayal of many many women.

PJ_Soul

jeffbr said:

PJ_Soul said:

jeffbr said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

It is possible to be anti-abortion and still be pro-freedom to allow women to decide what is best for their bodies and lives. Not everyone who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. They are simply proponents of self-determination. So if the women you know are opposed to allowing individuals to decide reproductive matters for themselves and would rather have that dictated to them by old, white men, then they probably wouldn't fit in with the majority of the marchers.

Nobody is "pro-abortion".

Nobody? I'm pretty sure you got my point, but if you want to argue, we can talk about the meaning of absolutes.

You said "not everybody who is pro-choice is pro-abortion." I'm saying that nobody who is pro-choice is pro-abortion, unless you're talking about a handful of full-blown psychopaths who might be into such a thing, and chances are such people actually couldn't care less about the right to choose.

PJPOWER

PJ_Soul said:

jeffbr said:

PJ_Soul said:

jeffbr said:

PJPOWER said:

HesCalledDyer said:

And MEN in the United States felt it necessary to take to social media on Saturday (and some haven't yet let go) to question why women were marching. Here ya go, ya sick pigs. Here's YOUR President's best buddy. Fuck Trump. Fuck Putin.

For the record, I know a few women that are wondering what the purpose of the march was... Evidently if you are a pro-life woman, you are not enough of a woman to participate in a woman rights march. But I agree...fuck Putin.

It is possible to be anti-abortion and still be pro-freedom to allow women to decide what is best for their bodies and lives. Not everyone who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. They are simply proponents of self-determination. So if the women you know are opposed to allowing individuals to decide reproductive matters for themselves and would rather have that dictated to them by old, white men, then they probably wouldn't fit in with the majority of the marchers.

Nobody is "pro-abortion".

Nobody? I'm pretty sure you got my point, but if you want to argue, we can talk about the meaning of absolutes.

You said "not everybody who is pro-choice is pro-abortion." I'm saying that nobody who is pro-choice is pro-abortion, unless you're talking about a handful of full-blown psychopaths who might be into such a thing, and chances are such people actually couldn't care less about the right to choose.

To add to that, not all women are pro-choice.