Options

Russia's Influence On The American Election

17980828485108

Comments

  • Options
    The JugglerThe Juggler Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,279
    edited October 2017
    funny stuff. I just read an article on cnn.com titled "how Fox is covering developments". LOL. 

    It is so creepy flipping over that channel. It's like an alternate universe that exists to calm the president's nerves or something...
    chinese-happy.jpg
  • Options
    HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,833
    funny stuff. I just read an article on cnn.com titled "how Fox is covering developments". LOL. 

    It is so creepy flipping over that channel. It's like an alternate universe that exists to calm the president's nerves or something...
    alternate universe is exactly the phrase I used when talking with my dad the other day about all of this. 
    Flight Risk out NOW!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • Options
    PJPOWERPJPOWER In Yo Face Posts: 6,499
    edited October 2017
    Wow, and now Podesta is has stepped down from The Podesta Group with speculation of possible charges tied to the Mueller investigation.  I do not think the dems or repubs are going to escape this unscarred.  

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/30/tony-podesta-stepping-down-from-lobbying-giant-amid-mueller-probe-244314


    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,631
    edited October 2017
    PJPOWER said:
    Wow, and now Podesta is has stepped down from The Podrsta Group with speculation of possible charges tied to the Mueller investigation.  I do not think the dems or repubs are going to escape this unscarred.  

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/30/tony-podesta-stepping-down-from-lobbying-giant-amid-mueller-probe-244314


    You understand that Podesta's firm was working for Manafort, right?  Manafort hired them.  As far as I know, Tony Podesta (not John) is a businessman and PR/lobby guy, and agnostic as to which political party or business hires him.  Is that not true?
    Post edited by mrussel1 on
  • Options
    PJPOWERPJPOWER In Yo Face Posts: 6,499
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Wow, and now Podesta is has stepped down from The Podrsta Group with speculation of possible charges tied to the Mueller investigation.  I do not think the dems or repubs are going to escape this unscarred.  

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/30/tony-podesta-stepping-down-from-lobbying-giant-amid-mueller-probe-244314


    You understand that Podesta's firm was working for Manafort, right?  Manafort hired them.  As far as I know, Tony Podesta (not John) is a businessman and PR/lobby guy, and agnostic as to which political party or business hires him.  Is that not true?
    He is sure being described as a “democrat power lobbyist” by all of the media outlets.  http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/30/politics/who-is-tony-podesta/index.html

  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,631
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Wow, and now Podesta is has stepped down from The Podrsta Group with speculation of possible charges tied to the Mueller investigation.  I do not think the dems or repubs are going to escape this unscarred.  

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/30/tony-podesta-stepping-down-from-lobbying-giant-amid-mueller-probe-244314


    You understand that Podesta's firm was working for Manafort, right?  Manafort hired them.  As far as I know, Tony Podesta (not John) is a businessman and PR/lobby guy, and agnostic as to which political party or business hires him.  Is that not true?
    He is sure being described as a “democrat power lobbyist” by all of the media outlets.  http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/30/politics/who-is-tony-podesta/index.html

    Why did he take a job working for a Republican then?
  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,631
    To be clear, I'm not saying he isn't a Democrat, or that the majority of his US work isn't for Democrats, but he's in trouble based on work he did for Manafort.  These aren't separate issues.  And Podesta didn't work for HRC campaign to my knowledge.  
  • Options
    dignindignin Posts: 9,303
    mrussel1 said:
    To be clear, I'm not saying he isn't a Democrat, or that the majority of his US work isn't for Democrats, but he's in trouble based on work he did for Manafort.  These aren't separate issues.  And Podesta didn't work for HRC campaign to my knowledge.  
    But can't you see, this means that the democrats are just as bad as the republicans.....just like antifa is just as bad as the nazis.

    Welcome to Trumps world.
  • Options
    PJPOWERPJPOWER In Yo Face Posts: 6,499
    mrussel1 said:
    To be clear, I'm not saying he isn't a Democrat, or that the majority of his US work isn't for Democrats, but he's in trouble based on work he did for Manafort.  These aren't separate issues.  And Podesta didn't work for HRC campaign to my knowledge.  
    Looks like all of the investigation is concentrated on pro-Russia work that these “collutants” well before the 2016 elections. These people chase the money regardless of their political affiliations.  This doesn’t specifically seem to be about HC or DT.
  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,631
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    To be clear, I'm not saying he isn't a Democrat, or that the majority of his US work isn't for Democrats, but he's in trouble based on work he did for Manafort.  These aren't separate issues.  And Podesta didn't work for HRC campaign to my knowledge.  
    Looks like all of the investigation is concentrated on pro-Russia work that these “collutants” well before the 2016 elections. These people chase the money regardless of their political affiliations.  This doesn’t specifically seem to be about HC or DT.
    You're right.  Except for the case of Papadopolous.  His conviction is directly tied into the election and I think he is the person most dangerous to Trump right now, directly. 

    Manafort and Flynn are dangerous not about these charges, but the seriousness of them and what it would take to make them talk.  Mueller will likely target Flynn's son to make Flynn talk.  I have to believe Flynn is next...
  • Options
    The JugglerThe Juggler Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,279
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    To be clear, I'm not saying he isn't a Democrat, or that the majority of his US work isn't for Democrats, but he's in trouble based on work he did for Manafort.  These aren't separate issues.  And Podesta didn't work for HRC campaign to my knowledge.  
    Looks like all of the investigation is concentrated on pro-Russia work that these “collutants” well before the 2016 elections. These people chase the money regardless of their political affiliations.  This doesn’t specifically seem to be about HC or DT.

    The "Fox and Friends" is strong with this one...
    chinese-happy.jpg
  • Options
    PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,539
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    To be clear, I'm not saying he isn't a Democrat, or that the majority of his US work isn't for Democrats, but he's in trouble based on work he did for Manafort.  These aren't separate issues.  And Podesta didn't work for HRC campaign to my knowledge.  
    Looks like all of the investigation is concentrated on pro-Russia work that these “collutants” well before the 2016 elections. These people chase the money regardless of their political affiliations.  This doesn’t specifically seem to be about HC or DT.
    You're right.  Except for the case of Papadopolous.  His conviction is directly tied into the election and I think he is the person most dangerous to Trump right now, directly. 

    Manafort and Flynn are dangerous not about these charges, but the seriousness of them and what it would take to make them talk.  Mueller will likely target Flynn's son to make Flynn talk.  I have to believe Flynn is next...
    I heard on the news that the investigation of Manafort goes right up to 2017, so yes, also including when he was working on Trump's campaign... was the news wrong this morning?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    To be clear, I'm not saying he isn't a Democrat, or that the majority of his US work isn't for Democrats, but he's in trouble based on work he did for Manafort.  These aren't separate issues.  And Podesta didn't work for HRC campaign to my knowledge.  
    Looks like all of the investigation is concentrated on pro-Russia work that these “collutants” well before the 2016 elections. These people chase the money regardless of their political affiliations.  This doesn’t specifically seem to be about HC or DT.

    The "Fox and Friends" is strong with this one...
    Lol
  • Options
    127 million Facebook dupes, some right here on this forum. Amazing. If only Hillary had thought of it. Where’s Al Gore when you need him?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?
  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,631
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?

    And let's not forget who a principle at the Mercury Group is... former Congressman Vin Weber (R) MN.  

  • Options
    josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 28,298
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?
    Again when do you think charges will be brought forth on HRC surely she's guilty of a crime no ? 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Options
    JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?
    Again when do you think charges will be brought forth on HRC surely she's guilty of a crime no ? 
    As Ive said many times, investigations are dog and pony shows, nothing much ever comes of them. Name the last investigation special or congressional where someone went to jail? There is them and there is us, different rules/laws for them. Perfect example, check the charges and penalties for those that were "caught up" (some journalists) protesting Trumps inauguration then compare them to Manaforts and Gates who earned millions manipulating foreign affairs, lied, evaded taxes and "conspired against the US".
  • Options
    CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via Chicago Posts: 6,793
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?
    Again when do you think charges will be brought forth on HRC surely she's guilty of a crime no ? 
    As Ive said many times, investigations are dog and pony shows, nothing much ever comes of them. Name the last investigation special or congressional where someone went to jail? There is them and there is us, different rules/laws for them. Perfect example, check the charges and penalties for those that were "caught up" (some journalists) protesting Trumps inauguration then compare them to Manaforts and Gates who earned millions manipulating foreign affairs, lied, evaded taxes and "conspired against the US".
    joe arpaio should be rotting in jail
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18 IT 07/05/2020 AT 07/07/2020
  • Options
    JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    CM189191 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?
    Again when do you think charges will be brought forth on HRC surely she's guilty of a crime no ? 
    As Ive said many times, investigations are dog and pony shows, nothing much ever comes of them. Name the last investigation special or congressional where someone went to jail? There is them and there is us, different rules/laws for them. Perfect example, check the charges and penalties for those that were "caught up" (some journalists) protesting Trumps inauguration then compare them to Manaforts and Gates who earned millions manipulating foreign affairs, lied, evaded taxes and "conspired against the US".
    joe arpaio should be rotting in jail
    exhibit B - good example
    the entire W Bush administration should also be in jail or the hague (coincidentally W has become a darling to Dems now!)
    althou "they" did nail Martha Stewart!
  • Options
    JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 18,919
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?
    Again when do you think charges will be brought forth on HRC surely she's guilty of a crime no ? 
    As Ive said many times, investigations are dog and pony shows, nothing much ever comes of them. Name the last investigation special or congressional where someone went to jail? There is them and there is us, different rules/laws for them. Perfect example, check the charges and penalties for those that were "caught up" (some journalists) protesting Trumps inauguration then compare them to Manaforts and Gates who earned millions manipulating foreign affairs, lied, evaded taxes and "conspired against the US".
    Put a pin in this. If it's true that investigations are dog and pony shows and nothing ever comes from them, it shouldn't be necessary for Trump to pardon his relatives, his political allies, or himself. We'll see how that plays out.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Options
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?
    Again when do you think charges will be brought forth on HRC surely she's guilty of a crime no ? 
    As Ive said many times, investigations are dog and pony shows, nothing much ever comes of them. Name the last investigation special or congressional where someone went to jail? There is them and there is us, different rules/laws for them. Perfect example, check the charges and penalties for those that were "caught up" (some journalists) protesting Trumps inauguration then compare them to Manaforts and Gates who earned millions manipulating foreign affairs, lied, evaded taxes and "conspired against the US".
    I’m sensing some, or should I say, feeling, some bern for Hillary? Or could it be Bernie and his wife are “guilty?” Don’t confuse actual crimes committed with actual “witch hunts.” Abscam, house post office, Eliot abrahms, Edwin Meese and others come to mind. Google yo!
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,833
    JC29856 said:
    CM189191 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?
    Again when do you think charges will be brought forth on HRC surely she's guilty of a crime no ? 
    As Ive said many times, investigations are dog and pony shows, nothing much ever comes of them. Name the last investigation special or congressional where someone went to jail? There is them and there is us, different rules/laws for them. Perfect example, check the charges and penalties for those that were "caught up" (some journalists) protesting Trumps inauguration then compare them to Manaforts and Gates who earned millions manipulating foreign affairs, lied, evaded taxes and "conspired against the US".
    joe arpaio should be rotting in jail
    exhibit B - good example
    the entire W Bush administration should also be in jail or the hague (coincidentally W has become a darling to Dems now!)
    althou "they" did nail Martha Stewart!
    he has not become a darling to dems now. he was always seen as the buffoon puppet to the Cheney regime. everyone always believed, and still believe to my knowledge, that Cheney was responsible for the decision to invade the mid east after 9/11. 
    Flight Risk out NOW!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • Options
    JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:
    CM189191 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?
    Again when do you think charges will be brought forth on HRC surely she's guilty of a crime no ? 
    As Ive said many times, investigations are dog and pony shows, nothing much ever comes of them. Name the last investigation special or congressional where someone went to jail? There is them and there is us, different rules/laws for them. Perfect example, check the charges and penalties for those that were "caught up" (some journalists) protesting Trumps inauguration then compare them to Manaforts and Gates who earned millions manipulating foreign affairs, lied, evaded taxes and "conspired against the US".
    joe arpaio should be rotting in jail
    exhibit B - good example
    the entire W Bush administration should also be in jail or the hague (coincidentally W has become a darling to Dems now!)
    althou "they" did nail Martha Stewart!
    he has not become a darling to dems now. he was always seen as the buffoon puppet to the Cheney regime. everyone always believed, and still believe to my knowledge, that Cheney was responsible for the decision to invade the mid east after 9/11. 
    Im going by this piece

    http://thehill.com/homenews/news/357109-poll-dems-have-favorable-view-of-george-w-bush


  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,631
    edited November 2017
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    CM189191 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    any guesses as to who Company A and Company B are in the indictments?

    its been reported those companys are the lobbying firms Mercury and Podesta Group. Interesting that Podesta Group retroactively filed amended FARA forms in Sept and Oct. Those FARA forms were part of the Manafort Gates indictment. I wonder if Manafort and Gates were given the opportunity to make amendments to their filings and if they declined?
    Again when do you think charges will be brought forth on HRC surely she's guilty of a crime no ? 
    As Ive said many times, investigations are dog and pony shows, nothing much ever comes of them. Name the last investigation special or congressional where someone went to jail? There is them and there is us, different rules/laws for them. Perfect example, check the charges and penalties for those that were "caught up" (some journalists) protesting Trumps inauguration then compare them to Manaforts and Gates who earned millions manipulating foreign affairs, lied, evaded taxes and "conspired against the US".
    joe arpaio should be rotting in jail
    exhibit B - good example
    the entire W Bush administration should also be in jail or the hague (coincidentally W has become a darling to Dems now!)
    althou "they" did nail Martha Stewart!
    he has not become a darling to dems now. he was always seen as the buffoon puppet to the Cheney regime. everyone always believed, and still believe to my knowledge, that Cheney was responsible for the decision to invade the mid east after 9/11. 
    Im going by this piece

    http://thehill.com/homenews/news/357109-poll-dems-have-favorable-view-of-george-w-bush


    The poll came after Bush's remarks on Trump. Human nature is to over weight recent memory.  Plus lots of Millennials were not adults in 2008. Last... yeah now we all know it could be a lot worse than Bush... because it is. 

    Do you ever contemplate what you post prior to posting?
  • Options
    dignindignin Posts: 9,303

    Russia probe could derail Trump nominee for top Agriculture post



    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politics/sam-clovis-department-of-agriculture/index.html?adkey=bn
  • Options
    dignindignin Posts: 9,303

    This is an interesting resource to find out where some here get their daily talking points.



    TRACKING RUSSIAN INFLUENCE OPERATIONS ON TWITTER


    http://dashboard.securingdemocracy.org/





  • Options
    JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    dignin said:

    This is an interesting resource to find out where some here get their daily talking points.



    TRACKING RUSSIAN INFLUENCE OPERATIONS ON TWITTER


    http://dashboard.securingdemocracy.org/





    I dont see shawn henry on there?

  • Options
    JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    127 million Facebook dupes, some right here on this forum. Amazing. If only Hillary had thought of it. Where’s Al Gore when you need him?
    The $1,500 worth of facebook ads that flipped the election to Trump and forever changed the course of American history!

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/01/social-media-ads-russia-wanted-americans-to-see-244423

  • Options
    JC29856 said:
    127 million Facebook dupes, some right here on this forum. Amazing. If only Hillary had thought of it. Where’s Al Gore when you need him?
    The $1,500 worth of facebook ads that flipped the election to Trump and forever changed the course of American history!

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/01/social-media-ads-russia-wanted-americans-to-see-244423

    You seem proud of this accomplishment. Are you proud?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
Sign In or Register to comment.