The C.I.A.’s conclusion does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election, several American officials, including some who had read the agency’s briefing, said on Sunday. Rather, it was an analysis of what many believe is overwhelming circumstantial evidence — evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments — that the Russians put a thumb on the scale for Mr. Trump, and got their desired outcome.
Where's the link and what's the source for this? And how did what you posted previously add up to this with your claim that you made? Keep trying JC, you might think you're slick but you're not. And OJ is innocent because of the overwhelming circumstantial evidence, right? Maybe Julian can shed some light?
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.
If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.
A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.
If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.
Yes, this. This whole Russian mess isn't REALLY about Trump, it's about the Democratic Party. It's the same old shit that was happening before the election. Distract distract distract.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.
If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.
Yes, this. This whole Russian mess isn't REALLY about Trump, it's about the Democratic Party. It's the same old shit that was happening before the election. Distract distract distract.
A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.
If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.
If a random former ambassador appeared and said, without any proof, that he had met the Russian operative who hacked the DNC, I would have my doubts and question it. So I also question and also have my doubts when a random former ambassador appears and says, without any proof, that he met the leaker and that it is an inside job.
A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.
If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.
If a random former ambassador appeared and said, without any proof, that he had met the Russian operative who hacked the DNC, I would have my doubts and question it. So I also question and also have my doubts when a random former ambassador appears and says, without any proof, that he met the leaker and that it is an inside job.
I agree.
Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin, but not go too far betting on Putin re Syria.
I will never understand how the public just accepts everything they're told, no questioning, no need for real proof what our leaders tell us. If Obama wants to see Trump out of the office, go a different direction. Because defending the corrupt Democratic Party isn't working anymore!
I will never understand how the public just accepts everything they're told, no questioning, no need for real proof what our leaders tell us. If Obama wants to see Trump out of the office, go a different direction. Because defending the corrupt Democratic Party isn't working anymore!
Proof:
BREAKING: CIA REMOTELY ACCESSED RUSSIAN HACKER'S WEBCAM MOMENTS BEFORE HACK, FIRST IMAGE HAS BEEN REVEALED!!!
I will never understand how the public just accepts everything they're told, no questioning, no need for real proof what our leaders tell us. If Obama wants to see Trump out of the office, go a different direction. Because defending the corrupt Democratic Party isn't working anymore!
Proof:
BREAKING: CIA REMOTELY ACCESSED RUSSIAN HACKER'S WEBCAM MOMENTS BEFORE HACK, FIRST IMAGE HAS BEEN REVEALED!!!
A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.
If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.
If a random former ambassador appeared and said, without any proof, that he had met the Russian operative who hacked the DNC, I would have my doubts and question it. So I also question and also have my doubts when a random former ambassador appears and says, without any proof, that he met the leaker and that it is an inside job.
I agree.
Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin, but not go too far betting on Putin re Syria.
The problem for Donald is that he stood at a podium and in full view of the press and the country begged Putin to hack Clinton. So he doesn't deserve much benefit of the doubt here.
A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.
If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.
If a random former ambassador appeared and said, without any proof, that he had met the Russian operative who hacked the DNC, I would have my doubts and question it. So I also question and also have my doubts when a random former ambassador appears and says, without any proof, that he met the leaker and that it is an inside job.
I agree.
Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin, but not go too far betting on Putin re Syria.
The problem for Donald is that he stood at a podium and in full view of the press and the country begged Putin to hack Clinton. So he doesn't deserve much benefit of the doubt here.
Yeah, I guess if he was serious he probably might have just texted Putin instead.
I will never understand how the public just accepts everything they're told, no questioning, no need for real proof what our leaders tell us. If Obama wants to see Trump out of the office, go a different direction. Because defending the corrupt Democratic Party isn't working anymore!
Proof:
BREAKING: CIA REMOTELY ACCESSED RUSSIAN HACKER'S WEBCAM MOMENTS BEFORE HACK, FIRST IMAGE HAS BEEN REVEALED!!!
The classic overreach. It proves that an investigation is not really what anybody is interested in.
The Clinton campaign doesn't speak for everybody so this hardly "proves that an investigation is not really what anybody is interested in." The Clintons don't get to speak for me and no action they take reveals anything about what I'm interested in.
I will never understand how the public just accepts everything they're told, no questioning, no need for real proof what our leaders tell us. If Obama wants to see Trump out of the office, go a different direction. Because defending the corrupt Democratic Party isn't working anymore!
Proof:
BREAKING: CIA REMOTELY ACCESSED RUSSIAN HACKER'S WEBCAM MOMENTS BEFORE HACK, FIRST IMAGE HAS BEEN REVEALED!!!
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Evan McMullin weighs in
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
Climate did not win trump the election.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/clinton-campaign-backs-call-for-intelligence-briefing-before-electoral-college-vote-232512
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.
If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.
https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/11/business/rex-tillerson-secretary-of-state-russia.amp.html
https://www.google.com/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2016/12/12/tillerson-choice-raises-questions-of-corporate-vs-national-interest.html
Hmmmmm? Theme?
BTW, got a link to this?
good boy...
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin, but not go too far betting on Putin re Syria.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25651
Date: 2015-12-21
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
BREAKING: CIA REMOTELY ACCESSED RUSSIAN HACKER'S WEBCAM MOMENTS BEFORE HACK, FIRST IMAGE HAS BEEN REVEALED!!!
http://m.imgur.com/16ehD1D
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/john-bolton-wonders-whether-alleged-russian-dnc-hack-was-an-obama-administration-false-flag/
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©