Home› The Porch
Options

in need of old review for "ten"

12345AGNST112345AGNST1 Posts: 4,906
edited December 2007 in The Porch
i need a link to old reviews fro the album ten. preferably rolling stone. it is for a term paper.
5/28/06, 6/27/08, 10/28/09, 5/18/10, 5/21/10
8/7/08, 6/9/09
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Options
    Stone IronsStone Irons Posts: 430
    Here's Rolling Stone and Entertainment Weekly:

    http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,316471,00.html

    http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/_/id/92157?
    Can't escape from the common rule...
    If you hate something, don't you do it too
  • Options
    pdalowskypdalowsky Doncaster,UK Posts: 14,697
    Hey, what a terrible rolling stone review.....

    wonder how it wopuld be written now, 17 years down the line??

    Bet it would be totally up their arse....

    were they really giving no stars or was it just not rated in stars at that time??

    Anyone giving this record no stars should be prevented from writing reviews. no argument
  • Options
    HatfieldHatfield Posts: 122
    I read one years ago from a newspaper that compared the sound to a beefed up Genisis. That reviewer probably rethought that a year after he wrote it.
    '96 - 10/5
    '98 - 9/1 9/4 9/18
    '00 - 8/6 8/7 8/15 8/17 9/5
    '03 - 4/9 4/15 4/19 7/11 7/12
    '04 - 10/6 10/8
    '05 - 9/11 9/12 9/13 9/15
    '06 - 5/27 5/28 7/7 7/13 7/18 7/22 7/23
  • Options
    pdalowskypdalowsky Doncaster,UK Posts: 14,697
    cant be bad being a journalist.

    might go and write for the national geographic and describe Tigers as a pest of the wild and they should all be shot. Be doing about as good a job as these cocks

    (to be clear I'm quite fond of tigers and wouldnt support that sentiment!!!!!)
  • Options
    Niko80Niko80 Posts: 1,555
    didnt they do a 'albums that should have gotten 5 stars' piece where ten was among the albums?
    I will swallow poison
  • Options
    Stone IronsStone Irons Posts: 430
    pdalowsky wrote:
    Hey, what a terrible rolling stone review.....

    wonder how it wopuld be written now, 17 years down the line??

    Bet it would be totally up their arse....

    were they really giving no stars or was it just not rated in stars at that time??

    Anyone giving this record no stars should be prevented from writing reviews. no argument

    According to the Rolling Stone link they gave it four stars, not zero.
    Can't escape from the common rule...
    If you hate something, don't you do it too
Sign In or Register to comment.